Report: Trump Surveillance Began Before He Was Even GOP Nominee
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Report: Trump Surveillance Began Before He Was Even GOP Nominee

  1. #1

    Report: Trump Surveillance Began Before He Was Even GOP Nominee

    Report: Trump Surveillance Began Before He Was Even GOP Nominee
    .
    By: Cortney O'Brien
    .
    Fox News anchor Adam Housley has obtained some new information in regards to who unmasked the names of U.S. officials like former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn in the ongoing Russia investigation.
    .
    For starters, Housley's sources have revealed that the surveillance of Trump started before he was even the GOP nominee, he said during the broadcast of "Outnumbered" on Friday.
    .
    These sources, who Housley says are "not Trump people," also claim to know the name of at least one person who was leaking the names.
    .
    The person who did the unmasking is a “very senior” and “very well known” person in the intelligence community, Housley said, adding that he or she is not in the FBI.
    .
    It seems the spreading of names was done for “political purposes that have nothing to do with national security,” or foreign intelligence, but hurting Trump’s team, Housley noted.
    .
    "It had everything to do with hurting and embarrassing Trump and his team," according to his sources.
    .
    Flynn, who was forced to resign as national security advisor after reports revealed he misled the White House in terms of his conversations with Russia, has asked the Senate Intelligence Committee for immunity in the investigation.
    .
    Read More:
    .
    https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortne...erson-n2307087
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    Every day were hearing more and more info that confirms what President Trump was correct.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. Donald Trump, Sep 27: "If you aren't guilty of a crime, what do you need immunity for"?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  4. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Aldodds3 View Post
    Donald Trump, Sep 27: "If you aren't guilty of a crime, what do you need immunity for"?


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    I would venture that, under "normal" circumstances, there should be no need for immunity. However, in case you haven't noticed, even the proven crooks in government have not been prosecuted for their crimes. For some reason, sedition and treason has been overlooked of late in the highest offices in the land. The political figures have gotten complete immunity from prosecution but, now, they want to crucify Flynn without even knowing his story. That doesn't seem quite right. When the rest of the crooked b*****ds are prosecuted, then go after Flynn, if there is some crime that has been committed.

  5. #4
    If the Senate is serious about looking into various so called crimes committed during the last election, then they need to look into the hundreds of millions donated to the Clinton Foundation and the $500,000 speaking fee that Bill received from Russia for a speaking engagement while Hillary was approving the release of 20% of our nuclear stockpile.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast