Youíre Surrounded, Mr. Mueller, Give Yourself Up; The Truth is Becoming Too Big To Hi
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Youíre Surrounded, Mr. Mueller, Give Yourself Up; The Truth is Becoming Too Big To Hi

  1. #1

    Youíre Surrounded, Mr. Mueller, Give Yourself Up; The Truth is Becoming Too Big To Hi

    Youíre Surrounded, Mr. Mueller, Give Yourself Up; The Truth is Becoming Too Big To Hide
    By Elizabeth Vaughn - on August 19, 2018

    Anyone whoís ever worked on a jigsaw puzzle knows that the process is tedious in the beginning. First, we place all the similar colored pieces in small groups, try various configurations and then we see how two groups might fit together and so on. At a certain point, the progress becomes faster until finally, a picture starts to emerge.


    Thanks to the painstaking efforts of lawmakers such as Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA) and Sen. Charles Grassley (R-IA), the release of the DOJ Inspector Generalís report in June and the tireless pursuit of documents by Tom Fitton of Judicial Watch, a picture of unimaginable deception of breathtaking proportions is emerging before the eyes of an astonished electorate.

    The once slow headway in the search for the truth has gained momentum. Democratic lawmakers, officials and most of the mainstream media are still in denial and donít seem to realize yet that too much of the truth has already been revealed for them to go back to their original narrative. The truth has become too big to hide.


    A comparison of the carnage at the very highest levels of the FBI and the DOJ to the complete lack of evidence of wrongdoing by President Trump following over two years of investigations should tell Robert Mueller that itís time to extricate himself, as gracefully as possible, from this fraud. He needs to admit defeat in his attempt to undo the results of a fair election.

    Seamus Bruner of The Epoch Times has just put together a list of 25 DOJ and FBI officials who have resigned in the last year. Some of them, Rachel Brand for example, have left to take positions in the private sector. Mike Kortan has said he was planning to retire anyway. But many on this list have been fired, or forced out (largely in disgrace) or demoted because of the Trump/Russia investigation.

    FBI Departures:

    James Comey, director (fired)
    Andrew McCabe, deputy director (fired)
    Peter Strzok, counterintelligence expert (fired)
    Lisa Page, attorney (demoted; resigned)
    James Rybicki, chief of staff (resigned)
    James Baker, general counsel (resigned)
    Mike Kortan, assistant director for public affairs (resigned)
    Josh Campbell, special assistant to James Comey (resigned)
    James Turgal, executive assistant director (resigned)
    Greg Bower, assistant director for office of congressional affairs (resigned)
    Michael Steinbach, executive assistant director (resigned)
    John Giacalone, executive assistant director (resigned)
    DOJ Departures:

    Sally Yates, deputy attorney general (fired)
    Bruce Ohr, associate deputy attorney general (twice demoted)
    David Laufman, counterintelligence chief (resigned)
    Rachel Brand, deputy attorney general (resigned)
    Trisha Beth Anderson, office of legal counsel for FBI (demoted or reassigned*)
    John P. Carlin, assistant attorney general (resigned)
    Peter Kadzik, assistant attorney general, congressional liaison (resigned)
    Mary McCord, acting assistant attorney general (resigned)
    Matthew Axelrod, principal assistant to deputy attorney general (resigned)
    Preet Bharara, U.S. attorney, SDNY (firedalong with 45 otherU.S. Attorneys)
    Sharon McGowan, civil rights division (resigned)
    Diana Flynn, litigation director for LGBTQ civil rights (resigned)
    Vanita Gupta, civil rights division (resigned)
    Joel McElvain, assistant branch director of the civil division (resigned)
    *Status Unclear

    As I look at this list, I know it includes only a fraction of those who have risked their careers and their reputations because they simply couldnít bear to see Donald Trump in the White House.

    Before this is over, others will be added to the list. Perhaps even Rod Rosenstein. And there will likely be former top-level Obama officials caught in the net as well. Perjurers John Brennan and James Clapper come to mind.

    In addition to the men and women who have been working against Trump in the DOJ and the FBI, there were/are employees in the State Department and the CIA, holdovers from the Obama administration, who are complicit.

    The mainstream media has played a huge role in perpetuating this hoax. They have breathlessly distorted events to influence public opinion. Instead of reporting the news, they have worked overtime to shape it.

    For an example of how the mainstream media has aided and abetted the leftís attempt to impeach Trump, we need to look no further than their outrage over the revocation of John Brennanís security clearance.

    We have MSNBCís Steve Schmidt saying ď40% of Americans have surrendered their intellectual sovereignty to Donald Trump.Ē This from a man who achieved more notoriety by his recent and loud departure from the Republican Party than he ever attained as a political strategist or for running John McCainís failed bid for the presidency. As if he matters.

    CNN Political Commentator Symone Sanderís chimed in on the subject. ďTrump sent Sarah Sanders to poop on the people from the Press Secretary Podium.Ē Sheís a real class act. There were other similar and predictable reactions from the left. (Reaction from the left can be heard in first 1:10 on the video below.)

    Fox anchor Mark Levin spoke to Sean Hannity and offered a fierce defense of the move:

    Hannity: We have never had a former communist who literally we now know spread Russian lies to misinform, propagandize the American people to impact a presidential election either. These are unprecedented times.

    Levin: First of all, apparently the fact that Brennan voted for a Stalinist who was funded by the Soviets, a communist party USA was very attractive to Barack Obama who made him CIA director. Think about that.

    So how did this man ever get a security clearance? Iím curious about this.

    Now, a couple of things. The president is, looking at Brennan, he revokes his security privilege. Professor Dershowitz needs to know thatís a privilege. Thatís not a right to security privilege.

    The fact to the matter is, nobody is stopping Brennan from speaking. In fact, nobody could stop. He has a big mouth, he will never shut up, heíll go on TV and be the kook that he is.

    The idea that he has a right to access to information because he served in the Obama administration at the CIA is a preposterous argument, but of course the ACLU will take it up the case because they take up a lot of stupid cases. Thatís number one.

    Number two, who else is the president looking at? Comey and people who are keeping score, Comey is a Republican. How many times have people told the media, Mueller is a Republican, Comey is a Republican, and even they question the president! OK, you got a Republican.

    And by the way, for the media, most of these people the president are looking at are white. I know thatís very important to you.

    Now Comey was fired at the recommendation of Rosenstein. Comey was a leaker and he absconded with government documents when he left. His security clearance should be pulled. McCabe is under criminal investigation, the number two from the FBI.

    Never before in history, media, his security clearance should be pulled! Peter Strzok was just fired. The guy in charge of counterintelligence investigations for misconduct, his security should be pulled!

    James Clapper committed perjury. He lied to the American people and Senator Wyden and that committee a long time ago, his security clearance should have been pulled.

    Bruce Ohr, another one. Pulled! Yates, another one, not because the president has a problem with Democrats or liberals, he has a problem with these people. And we havenít even got to the unmasking issue yet. So this is not a First Amendment issue.

    Meanwhile ó meanwhile! When these people have security clearances, what the hell did they do with them? Well, letís take a look. The Russians interfered in our election, right? Well, who was president, who was head of the CIA, who was national security advisor, who was the head of the FBI? All of these people with their security clearances in position to power did nothing effective to stop the Russians from interfering in our election.

    They did nothing to stop China from stealing our technology. They did nothing to stop North Koreaís nuclear program. And even worse, they awarded the terrorist regime in Tehran with $150 billion, right? With $150 billion and provided them with a pathway to nuclear weapons.

    Good job, boys and girl in the Obama administration with your security clearances. The fact that Obama appointed these people and gave them security clearances, itís not the obligation of this president to let them retain their security clearances. There is no constitutional issue. Thatís just nonsense. And again, one of them is a Republican. So that makes this all OK.

    Hannity: Mark, I would take away all of their clearances.

    Levin: I would take away all of their clearances too. But the fact of the matter is we really need to focus in on the conduct of these individuals. Look at the phony media and the arguments they are making.

    This is like a dictatorship. This is ó this is ó and weíve never seen anything like this before. All these blabbermouths who know nothing, you are going to see Clapper on TV until you throw up on your loafers.

    You are going to see Comey he had his book thing, you are going to see Brennan all over the place, all these phony victims and so forth and so on.

    Meanwhile, when they were in office, when they had their security clearances, when they had power, they didnít stop the Russians, they didnít stop the red Chinese, they didnít stop the North Koreans, they funded the Iranians, and, in fact, they are responsible for the greatest scandal in American history by interfering with our election and trying to undermine the Trump campaign.

    Hannity: And the Trump presidency. I think we got to remember, hold on, Mark and throw off all my loafers. But more importantly, thatís what we call you the great one. Great commentary, Mark Levin. Thank you.

    https://gellerreport.com/2018/08/mue...uth-hide.html/


    From the moment candidate Donald Trump won the Republican nomination, the deck was stacked against him. He was a chicken, surrounded by wolves, and they were just waiting for the right moment to consume him. But they all underestimated him. Crazy as people believe Trump to be, he has prevailed in the face of overwhelming opposition.

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    406
    That's a very long current and potentially future list. Looks like Trump is indeed draining the swamp just like he promised. No wonder Dems and libs are frantic.
    It is to one's honor to avoid strife, but every fool is quick to quarrel (Pro 20:3) // I came here to build Pro-2A consensus to help our country, not trade insults like a fifth-grader. If you're on ignore, well, now you know why.

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,143
    From the beginning, the Trump Russian investigation by Mueller was based on the false dossier and if there was any true Russian investigation by Mueller's team, they would be looking directly at everything that Hillary and the DNC has done. From paying millions through Fusion GPS to Steele to make up the false dossier to all the underhanded items that were done during the election that WikiLeaks showed that happened with all the E-mails they exposed.
    .
    From what I've heard, Mueller's instruction document from Rosenstein only directed them towards Trump and there wasn't any directions to look at anything Hillary, which is a way out for Mueller and isn't correct if Rosenstein wanted a 100% investigation of Russian interference in the election, it gives Mueller plausible denial ability, or what Sgt. Schultz used to say, "I see nothing".
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  5. #4
    Lets consider where we ACTUALLY are.

    People at the top of Trump’s business, campaign & administration confess they are *guilty* of crimes (Cohen, Gates, Flynn) or are indicted/soon to be found guilty of crimes (Manafort);

    Spies for the country offering collusion are indicted and in custody (Maria Butina + other named Russian Army Officers and companies.);

    Trump resists going under oath about any of it(Because he is incapable of NOT lying).

  6. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by S&W29 View Post
    Lets consider where we ACTUALLY are.

    People at the top of Trumpís business, campaign & administration confess they are *guilty* of crimes (Cohen, Gates, Flynn) or are indicted/soon to be found guilty of crimes (Manafort);

    Spies for the country offering collusion are indicted and in custody (Maria Butina + other named Russian Army Officers and companies.);

    Trump resists going under oath about any of it(Because he is incapable of NOT lying).
    And yet, the witch hunt hasn't hurt Trump personally because he isn't guilty of the charges that started this whole thing. They have proven that he there was no collusion to charge him. Everything else is a desperate attempt to get Trump for anything they can. Trump resists going under oath because he is completely aware there will be an attempt at entrapment. He is smarter than Mueller, et al.

    The Democrats have done more harm to themselves in this endeavor and exposed them as being criminals who will resort to total dishonesty to destroy Trump. Just for the sake of curiosity, why haven't the Democrats gone after the Clintons? Where is the righteous indignation from the Left?

  7. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Oldgrunt View Post
    And yet, the witch hunt hasn't hurt Trump personally because he isn't guilty of the charges that started this whole thing. They have proven that he there was no collusion to charge him. Everything else is a desperate attempt to get Trump for anything they can. Trump resists going under oath because he is completely aware there will be an attempt at entrapment. He is smarter than Mueller, et al.

    The Democrats have done more harm to themselves in this endeavor and exposed them as being criminals who will resort to total dishonesty to destroy Trump. Just for the sake of curiosity, why haven't the Democrats gone after the Clintons? Where is the righteous indignation from the Left?
    Here is a reminder:

    Hillary Clinton’s Attorney has NOT plead guilty and named her as a co-conspirator in open court.

    Her campaign chairman is NOT convicted and in prison.

    Her campaign aides are NOT awaiting sentencing.

    She is NOT having a nervous breakdown in her bathroom while her spouse yells “I really don’t care, do u?”

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,143
    Quote Originally Posted by S&W29 View Post
    Here is a reminder:

    Hillary Clinton’s Attorney has NOT plead guilty and named her as a co-conspirator in open court.

    Her campaign chairman is NOT convicted and in prison.

    Her campaign aides are NOT awaiting sentencing.

    She is NOT having a nervous breakdown in her bathroom while her spouse yells “I really don’t care, do u?”
    Can you honestly say that Hillary didn’t have above Top Secret items on her unsecured server and five foreign countries gained access to them; didn’t Comey admit that she had them?
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  9. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by opsspec1991 View Post
    Can you honestly say that Hillary didnít have above Top Secret items on her unsecured server and five foreign countries gained access to them; didnít Comey admit that she had them?
    I don't need to. Comey already testified before Congress that the material in question, or the intent did not rise to the level of a prosecutable crime.

    Sent from my SM-G965U using USA Carry mobile app

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    406
    Comey lied. Hillary's actions were most certainly prosecutable crimes. There are people sitting in Leavenworth who committed far less.
    It is to one's honor to avoid strife, but every fool is quick to quarrel (Pro 20:3) // I came here to build Pro-2A consensus to help our country, not trade insults like a fifth-grader. If you're on ignore, well, now you know why.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast