The Democrat Party - Page 10
Page 10 of 78 FirstFirst ... 891011122060 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 780

Thread: The Democrat Party

  1. #91
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Democrats Continue To Violate Constitution, So Conservatives Do The Same… For Good
    .
    Although the constitution prevents states from ignoring federal law (like desegregation), that has never stopped democrats from trying it. And since their recent success with sanctuary policy has been met without opposition, it has emboldened at least one Republican to do the same in Texas, but for a much different reason.
    .
    A 'gun sanctuary' law is gaining speed in Texas, which would prevent all federal laws from applying to guns.
    .
    In the 1960’s, democrat controlled states fought desegregation. The National Guard was needed to enforce federal law in Alabama schools because democrats thought that states should be able to pick and choose which laws they followed.
    .
    Nothing has changed. Today, democrat controlled states allow unfettered illegal immigration and prevent the execution of federal law, often actively thwarting it when agents try to remove violent criminals from the U.S.
    .
    But, one republican senator in Texas has had enough. If democrats can get away with violating the constitution for their own evil ends, why shouldn’t the right be able to protect freedoms in the same way?
    .
    “As reported by The Free Thought Project, lawmakers in Texas have introduced a “gun sanctuary” bill that would apply to the entire state. If it passes, it would essentially nullify nearly all federal gun control laws within the state:
    .
    Sen. Bob Hall (R-Edgewood) filed Senate Bill 378 (SB378) on January 17. The bill would prohibit any state government agency, personnel or public funds from enforcing any federal gun control regulation or law “if the federal statute, order, rule, or regulation or international law imposes a prohibition, restriction, or other regulation, such as a capacity, size, or configuration limitation, that does not exist under the laws of this state.”
    .
    Basically, it would make Texas a sanctuary for gun owners.
    .
    The National Sentinel reported:
    .
    In October 2017, in direct defiance of POTUS Donald Trump’s efforts to crack down on so-called “sanctuary cities” through the enforcement of all federal immigration laws, then-California Gov. Jerry Brown signed landmark legislation declaring the entire state a sanctuary for illegal aliens.
    .
    The Democrat super-majority ruling the Golden State celebrated the legislation as a rebuke of the president, but in reality, what SB 54 really does is hinder the federal government’s immigration authority.
    .
    No matter, as The Los Angeles Times reported then:
    .
    Legal experts have said federal officials may try to block the law in court to keep it from being implemented. Some doubt such challenges would be successful, pointing to the 10th Amendment and previous rulings in which courts have found the federal government can’t compel local authorities to enforce federal laws.
    .
    It’s interesting that a Left-wing paper would provide Leftist Democrats with constitutional cover, considering that the Donkey Party doesn’t concern itself about what our founding document says when it comes to the Second Amendment.
    .
    For decades Democrats have ignored a key provision of the Second Amendment — the part where it says the right “shall not be infringed” — when passing what they have always characterized as “common-sense gun laws.”
    .
    But the fact of the matter is, there is no such thing: Any law that restricts or otherwise regulates the manner in which an American citizen, regardless of any other mitigating factor, can obtain, own, carry, and “bear” a firearm is unconstitutional, period.
    .
    Despite the Constitution’s “Supremacy Clause,” which states clearly that federal laws supersede state laws and even state constitutions, Democrat-run states and cities are getting away with not simply ignoring federal immigration laws but actively thwarting federal immigration officials (such as refusing ICE detainer requests to turn over suspected criminal aliens). Many of the same states have also given the middle finger to federal prohibitions against recreational marijuana use.
    .
    So while law-and-order conservatives are likely to find the prospect of widespread nullification distasteful, at this point we really don’t have much choice: It’s either adopt the Left’s tactic or be “ruled” instead of governed.
    .
    At least conservatives have the Constitution on their side: Gun control laws are “infringements” on the Second Amendment, period. Some lawmakers in Texas, along with sheriffs in at least four other states, have come to understand that this key provision matters in the face of a new onslaught of Democrat measures aimed at further restricting citizens’ right to keep and bear firearms.
    .
    Let Texas sound the gun sanctuary rallying cry. Let the Lone Star State’s effort spread to hundreds of other jurisdictions.
    .
    Most likely, various democrat groups will bring various lawsuits over this push to bring at least one state back to the way the constitution intended, but there’s a catch.
    .
    Every fight will provide precedence for the abolition of sanctuary for illegal aliens.
    .
    Read More: https://conservativedailypost.com/de...%20-%20Engaged
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    This should cause all of the liberal Democrats to have their hair all on fire for sure. I especially like the very last sentence, “Every fight will provide precedence for the abolition of sanctuary for illegal aliens”.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #92
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Democrats Are So DESPERATE FOR VOTES In 2020, They Want Not Only Illegals To Vote, But Also CHILDREN!
    .
    A majority of House Democrats on Wednesday voted to lower the federal voting age from 18 to 16.
    .
    A number of high-profile Democrats voted in favor of the legislation.
    .
    Those Democrats included California Reps. Adam Schiff, Eric Swalwell, Maxine Waters and Ted Lieu, Hawaii Rep. and Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Michigan Rep. Rashida Tlaib and Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar.
    .
    Democratic Massachusetts Rep. Ayanna Pressley introduced the legislation Tuesday evening as an amendment to House Democrats’ “For The People Act” which would overhaul federal election laws.
    .
    Pressley’s amendment fell short 126-305, thanks to a split Democratic vote and near-unanimous Republican opposition.
    .
    House Democrats voted 125-108 in favor of Pressley’s amendment, with two members voting present and three members not voting.
    .
    House Republicans voted against the amendment 197-1. Texas Rep. Michael Burgesswas the only Republican to vote yes.
    .
    Pressley cited teen activists pushing for gun control as a reason to give 16-year-oldsthe right to vote, which she compared to having a driver’s license.
    .
    “Young people are at the forefront of some of our most existential crises,” she said in her remarks Tuesday.
    .
    “The time has come. Our young people deserve to have the opportunity to exercise their right to vote.”
    .
    Read More: https://en-volve.com/2019/03/12/demo...also-children/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    Aren’t these the same Democrats that just last year said, that young people are too young buy a gun?
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  4. #93
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Do Delusional Dems Believe Their Own BS?
    .
    It’s truly astounding how clueless some people can be.
    .
    You see it every day — from the drivers who don’t realize they have turn signals to people who bring 20 items to the 10-or-fewer express lane…
    .
    But nowhere is rampant cluelessness more on display than in the Democrat party.
    .
    We could list every instance of their boneheadedness — but none of us have the amount of time that it would take to either read or write it…
    .
    But we can take a look at a few choice examples and collectively shake our heads.
    .
    One of the biggest perpetrators of cluelessness is the Liberal darling of the month, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez…
    .
    We could sit here for days just discussing the amount of times that she’s gotten things so wrong. It’s hard to believe she can tie her own shoes.
    .
    From campaigning with Bernie Sanders and saying that they were going to “flip this seat red” to the time she railed against farting cows and getting rid of air travel…
    .
    AOC is the queen of DNC cluelessness.
    .
    However…
    .
    She’s getting enough attention from the right, which only fuels her fervent followers into defending her and pushing them further into the socialist fold — so we’re going to leave her alone for today.
    .
    Besides…
    .
    She’s bound to do something incredible boneheaded soon, and we’ll have plenty of time to discuss that.
    .
    So let’s move on…
    .
    Next on the docket: Rashida Tlaib.
    .
    This freshman lawmaker gained all kinds of attention and praise for her victory speech after winning her seat, saying, “And when your son looks at you and says, ‘Mama look, you won. Bullies don’t win,’ and I said, ‘Baby, they don’t,’ because we’re gonna go in there and we’re going to impeach the motherf****r!”
    .
    Isn’t that a nice way to speak to your son?
    .
    That’s a prime example of her cluelessness…
    .
    Not to mention the fact that Tlaib also follows an anti-Semitic site on social media, or her racist rhetoric when calling conservative HUD official, Lynne Patterson, as being a “prop”.
    .
    Prompting Patterson to ask why Tlaib would believe a “self-confessed perjurer and criminally convicted white man” over a black female, saying, “So, to me, that would be my question; that’s more racist than being put up there as a quote, unquote prop. Trump has time and time again done so much for the black community, and I’m proud to be a part of it.”
    .
    But…
    .
    You’re not allowed to say anything about either woman — because if you do, you’re either a bigot, racist, sexist or religiously intolerant.
    .
    Even though the fact that you may disagree with them on every level politically, and neither their race, gender or religion has any factor in that disagreement — it won’t matter.
    .
    You’ll be labeled, and you can’t really fight against a label.
    .
    So, while we could harp on their denseness all day, for sake of avoiding a letter writing campaign…
    .
    We’ll leave them alone.
    .
    Let’s move on to the men, shall we?
    .
    Bernie Sanders…
    .
    Nah, too easy. Way too much stuff to list. Seriously. Way too much.
    .
    So we’ll move on…
    .
    How about the other DNC darling: Robert “Beto” O’Rourke.
    .
    What’s there not to like about Beto?
    .
    Besides the fact that he’s extremely liberal and is guilty of cultural appropriation — his nickname is something many Hispanics use for people when their name ends in –berto, as in “Roberto” or “Humberto.”
    .
    The truth is, Beto isn’t as clueless as AOC, Tlaib or any of the new names popping up on the political radar, but…
    .
    He may be embarking on one of the most clueless acts you’ll ever see from a relatively unknown Democrat member.
    .
    He’s THINKING of running for president.
    .
    Now, this thought in and of itself isn’t clueless — of course, you would expect any politician worth their salt to one day hold the most coveted and highest seat of the land…
    .
    So, no, that’s not what makes this a clueless endeavor.
    .
    No, what makes this a bad idea for Beto are two things…
    .
    First, he’d be running against the juggernaut that is the Trump Train — and he has very little in ammunition in reserve in order to stop the president’s forward momentum.
    .
    But you could say that for any Democrat really, so that’s really not the crux of his cluelessness…
    .
    No, why Beto takes the Bonehead of the Year Award is the simple fact that he couldn’t even win an election in his home state, so the fact that he could win a national election is beyond the realm of thought.
    .
    He lost to “Lion” Ted Cruz…
    .
    Sure, he made it close, but he still lost. So what makes him believe that the rest of the nation will get behind him when people in his own home state won’t?
    .
    It’s crazy to think, isn’t it?
    .
    Now, to be fair, Beto hasn’t declared his candidacy yet.
    .
    There’s been a lot of speculation and conjecture as to whether or not he will declare…
    .
    But he’s starting to gain the type of momentum that a prospective candidate would…
    .
    Plus, he just made his first trip to Iowa — the traditional birth ground of many presidential campaigns. Now, he’s stated he’s only going to campaign for a fellow DNC candidate…
    .
    But if you don’t believe he’s testing those political waters, you’d be as clueless as the Dems.
    .
    And you’re not clueless.
    .
    The only danger?
    .
    Beto displays a little bit of those “rock star” qualities that Obama used to sneak his way into the White House — you know, by being all flash and style with no substance.
    .
    So, while I don’t believe a presidential bid would be smart for Beto and believe he’d be defeated handedly…
    .
    He does have a modicum of threat to him.
    .
    And only a fool would underestimate his opponent.
    .
    However, this and the other examples of the DNC proclivity to idiocracy begs the question:
    .
    Do these people know what they’re slinging is BS?
    .
    Or do they really believe what they’re shoveling?
    .
    Because one is just underhanded…
    .
    While the other is just straight up dangerous for America.
    .
    Only time will tell…
    .
    “Narcissism falls along the axis of what psychologists call personality disorders, one of a group that includes antisocial, dependent, histrionic, avoidant and borderline personalities. But by most measures, narcissism is one of the worst, if only because the narcissists themselves are so clueless.” —Jeffrey Kluger
    .
    Read More: https://freedomwire.com/do-delusiona...-their-own-bs/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    With the Democrats slipping further and further to the left, it’s hard to believe they will be able to return to the center in time for the general election.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  5. #94
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Dems Lose Again And Finally Admit Defeat
    .
    By: Sean Robertson
    .
    Holy. Crap.
    .
    After months and years of the Left calling for the impeachment of Donald Trump — regardless of the fact that he’s done NOTHING wrong to merit it — the truth finally comes out…
    .
    They’ve. Got. Nothing.
    .
    After YEARS of searching for or making up something in an attempt to get Trump kicked out of the White House — Pelosi admits that she’s ruling it out.
    .
    At least that’s what she said to The Washington Post, saying, “Impeachment is so divisive to the country that unless there’s something so compelling and overwhelming and bipartisan, I don’t think we should go down that path, because it divides the country. And he’s just not worth it.”
    .
    Those are the words she used…
    .
    But reading between the lines — it means so much more.
    .
    It means they have nothing to impeach him for. If there was one thing they could get him on — you can bet your bottom dollar that if they had even the tiniest sliver of evidence that he committed some sort of offense — that they’d be pushing hard to get the process started.
    .
    Pelosi just revealed the Dem’s hand…
    .
    And they’re not even holding a pair of deuces after the river.
    .
    If you look even closer between those lines — it tells us something else…
    .
    With speculation that the Mueller report will finally be seeing the light of day soon — word has probably leaked out what the deep state and rational Americans already know — that there is NO evidence of collusion with Russia.
    .
    Of course, we don’t have any inside information on that…
    .
    But, there’s no way the Wicked Witch of Washington, D.C. would back off from impeachment if there was even a whisper of a chance at finding him guilty — especially when the report could be made public at any moment.
    .
    And she’s not the only one…
    .
    In addition to Ol Screwface herself, other top Dems have echoed her statements as well — but were all waiting till the release of the Muller report on Russia.
    .
    The way things look now — they’re definitely not going to get what they wanted from the investigation…
    .
    And are conceding.
    .
    This. Is. Big!
    .
    Bigger than the Left wants to admit.
    .
    If you listen close, you can hear the liberal’s collective sigh of frustration — and it’s music to every conservative’s ears.
    .
    Trump has defeated them at every turn…
    .
    It started with Russia, then they moved on to Stormy Daniels. They’ve labeled him sexist, bigot and racist — but nothing they’ve been able to make up or reveal has been able to take him down.
    .
    This tells us that Trump is exactly the man we thought he was…
    .
    Brash, pushy, unapologetic, a bit of a braggart — which all masks the fact that he’s a good man on a mission to do something incredible for the country that created him.
    .
    Even with them battling him at every turn…
    .
    Even now, they’re trying to investigate him — not for a certain crime — but for ANY crime!
    .
    This is unprecedented!
    .
    Never has a president been investigated for the sake of HOPING to find something wrong…
    .
    But that’s exactly what House Democrats are trying to do by expanding and extending their investigation into President Trump and his people. These idiots have even gone so far as to request documents from over 80 individuals and entities regarding their finances and communications.
    .
    Why?
    .
    For what crime?
    .
    None. This is the epitome of a witch hunt, as the only reason Trump is being investigated now is because these mouth breathers are hoping to find something — anything — that they can use to get him impeached.
    .
    Basically, it’s another waste of time and money by the Dems…
    .
    But that’s nothing new.
    .
    Dem’s love wasting time and money — that’s the primary purpose of their party — if you don’t count racist activity.
    .
    As frivolous as this NEW investigation is — it’s not going to stop the TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) sufferers from listening to what Pelosi’s actually telling them…
    .
    These young bucks are planning to ignore House leadership and still try to move forward with their craziness, by trying to bring impeachment proceedings against our president.
    .
    To emphasize this lunacy, Dem senator, “Crazy” Chris Murphy, has gone on record showing the doesn’t care about evidentiary support. He said:
    .
    What we know is that the president’s behavior has already crossed the threshold of what was brought for impeachment before the House in the Nixon administration and the Clinton administration. In fact, he crossed those thresholds in the first weeks or months of office. And so, that is another means, if these other means fail, to control this president.
    .
    Riiiiiiiiight…
    .
    So, where’s your proof of this line-crossing, Chris?
    .
    Let’s face it…
    .
    The bottom line is — Trump has done nothing wrong — but Dems are the sorest losers of all time and are really just trying to get rid of him because…
    .
    They just don’t like him.
    .
    That’s what it really comes down too…
    .
    These elected officials are acting like babies and trying to justify their existence — thinking that if they get Trump impeached will somehow prove to their constituents that they’re actually doing something.
    .
    Well, if these idiots want a nickel’s worth of free advice, here it is…
    .
    They’re fighting for a lost cause.
    .
    They’re not going to win this one…
    .
    In fact, they’re going to lose — and all this new investigation is going to do is shine a spotlight on that failure.
    .
    Think they’ll get re-elected by their liberal constituents if they can get rid of Trump?
    .
    But they don’t seem to care — logic and facts have no place in their world — so they’ll keep fighting.
    .
    That’s fine…
    .
    Keep fighting and keep losing.
    .
    We’ll be sitting over here with Trump and the rest of America…
    .
    Winning.
    .
    “For those who believe, no proof is necessary. For those who don’t believe, no proof is possible.” – Stuart Chase
    .
    Read More: https://freedomwire.com/dems-lose-ag...-admit-defeat/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    The Dem’s are realizing two things.
    .
    One, looking at history and what happened to the Republicans after they tried to impeach Clinton.
    .
    Second, Trump came back with a counter item, that he would declassify and underact thousands of items that show the various illegal items that the Dem’s have done over the past three years, if not further back.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  6. #95
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Nancy Pelosi Tries to Push Through Shady 622 Page Bill
    .
    The House Dems are trying to push through dangerous legislation. Dangerous for Democracy that is. House Dems have passed Bill H.R.1. They claim it does the following:
    .
    “Creates automatic voter registration, Forces presidents to make their tax returns public, Turns over congressional redistricting to independent commissions, and Bars federal lawmakers from settling discrimination cases with public money.”
    .
    And that is only scratching the surface of the 622 pages bill.
    .
    Pelosi has high hope for the bill.
    .
    “H.R. 1 restores the people’s faith that government works for the public interest, the people’s interest, not the special interest,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said Friday morning on the steps of the U.S. Capitol surrounded by members of her caucus. It “is fundamental to a democracy that people believe that actions taken here will be in their interest.”
    .
    But the Republican-led Senate has no interest in passing this bill into law.
    .
    The bill has no chance to become law. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said it’s a “terrible bill” that he won’t give any floor time.
    .
    GOP critics say the measure is an unconstitutional maneuver that would enable voter fraud, saddle taxpayers with unnecessary costs and tilt elections in favor of Democrats.
    .
    “This bill is a Democrat push to elect more Democrats and to put more money into the pockets of members of Congress and anyone running for election … under the guise of campaign finance reform,” said Rodney Davis, R-Ill., the top Republican on the Committee on House Administration, which handled the bill.”
    .
    “The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), which often sides with Democrats, has also criticized H.R. 1 for some of its restrictions on political speech, writing to Congress that the legislation could “unconstitutionally burden the speech and associational rights of many public interest organizations and American citizens” and “chill speech essential to our public discourse.”
    .
    The bill would call for a regression back to paper ballots, I feel like they should have excluded Florida from that one, and for 16-year-olds to vote in the presidential elections. Republicans are not for this bill claiming it would open the door to voter fraud. There are college kids that don’t have licenses, how are 16-year-olds supposed to present ID?
    .
    Read More: https://thepatriotchronicles.com/new...%20Guns%20Work
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    It’s just like Nancy and the POS Dem's, trying to circumvent the voting procedures for their own gain Just another way to allow illegal immigrants to vote and to hell with the legal American citizen voters.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  7. #96
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    WATCH: Pelosi Desperately Tries to Name ‘Signature Accomplishment’ of Beto O’Rourke
    .
    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stumbled through a series of questions regarding Texas Congressman Beto O’Rourke this week; fumbling while trying to list a single accomplishment brought about by the potential presidential candidate.
    .
    “Beto O’Rourke announced today that he is running for president. What in your view was Beto O’Rourke’s signature accomplishment as a member of the House?” asked one reporter during her weekly press conference.
    .
    Nancy Pelosi was asked what Beto's "signature accomplishment" was in Congress.
    .
    She couldn't name anything specific.
    .
    Why?
    .
    Because he only passed one bill: naming a courthouse.
    .
    Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi stumbled through a series of questions regarding Texas Congressman Beto O’Rourke this week; fumbling while trying to list a single accomplishment brought about by the potential presidential candidate.
    .
    “Beto O’Rourke announced today that he is running for president. What in your view was Beto O’Rourke’s signature accomplishment as a member of the House?” asked one reporter during her weekly press conference.
    .
    Nancy Pelosi was asked what Beto's "signature accomplishment" was in Congress.
    .
    She couldn't name anything specific.
    .
    Why?
    .
    Because he only passed one bill: naming a courthouse.
    .
    “Beto brought vitality to Congress…when he came, he came as a real champion for the environment,” Pelosi fumbled. “He got a great deal of support from the environmental community in his district, he won a primary on that subject.”
    .
    “Also… he was a member of the Armed Services Committee, a strong member of the Armed Services Committee, which is very important for his district,” she added. “In preserving our planet and protecting our people, they’re at least two areas in addition to his vitality in so many different ways.”
    .
    Read More & Watch video of Nancy: https://www.hannity.com/media-room/w...-beto-orourke/
    .
    My thoughts:
    .
    With political backers like Nancy, who needs enemies?
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  8. #97
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Democrats Demand Right to Life for Kittens, But Block Bills to Stop Infanticide.
    .
    What do cats have that newborn babies don’t? Democrats’ support.
    .
    In one of the sickest ironies no one is talking about, Senate liberals picked this moment — 17 days after they voted to kill America’s perfectly healthy infants — to fight for the humane treatment of kittens. Maybe the DNC’s strategists are out to lunch, or maybe the Left really is this shameless, but I can’t wait to see some of these politicians standing on debate platforms next year telling the American people that when it comes to protecting living things: We chose cats over kids.
    .
    For sponsors like Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), the optics are nauseating. Here he is, arguing that America “must stop killing kittens,” when, three weeks ago, he stood in the U.S. Capitol and agreed with 43 Democrats that human beings should be put down. “The USDA’s decision to slaughter kittens after they are used in research is an archaic practice and horrific treatment, and we need to end it,” Merkley said with a passion that he and his colleagues couldn’t muster for a generation of perfectly healthy newborns. His Kittens in Traumatic Testing Ends Now — or KITTEN – Act wouldn’t stop the research, but it would keep the animals from being destroyed.
    .
    “The KITTEN Act will protect these innocent animals from being needlessly euthanized in government testing,” Merkley told reporters, “and make sure that they can be adopted by loving families instead.” Does he even hear himself? They should be treated and adopted? That’s exactly what Americans have requested for living, breathing babies. Democrats said no. Killing a child is a “personal decision,” they said, and Congress shouldn’t get in the way. What a comfort for abortion survivors like Melissa Ohden to know that, given the choice, Democrats would save a stray cat over her.
    .
    “The fact that we need a piece of legislation to tell the federal government to stop killing kittens is ridiculous on its face,” Congressman Brian Mast (R-Fla.) argued. But “ridiculous” doesn’t begin to describe a party that tells America to back away from the tables of crying newborns while it rushes to the rescue of kittens instead. I suppose we should also tell firefighters when they run into burning houses to look for the pets first? After all, on the Democrats’ sliding scale of “wantedness,” shouldn’t we find out how loved someone is before we decide if they’re worth saving?

    .
    Meanwhile, as if legal infanticide isn’t revolting enough, House Democrats have decided Americans should pay for it. In what’s turning out to be a test for the most unpopular majority in history, Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s (D-Calif.) chamber is pushing a bill that would force a country who overwhelmingly opposes late-term abortion to bankroll it – along with abortions in any trimester. Rep. Diane DeGette (D-Colo.), another liberal who can’t seem to take taxpayers’ “No!” for an answer, is trying to overturn the Hyde amendment. “It’s just important as we move forward that we pass legislation that honors women’s reproductive health and their decisions,” she said.
    .
    But what about honoring taxpayers — two-thirds of whom fiercely oppose the idea of financing the Left’s killing machine? And that includes “pro-choicers.” Although the bill doesn’t stand a chance in the Senate, it could still make history. If Pelosi keeps up with the Left’s tone-deafness and brings DeGette’s bill up for the vote, it would be the first time the House has voted to overturn Hyde in history.
    .
    While House and Senate Democrats seem obsessed with taking lives, at least one court is helping states protect them. In what may turn out to be the ruling that turned the Supreme Court tide, the Sixth Circuit Court sided with Ohio in defunding Planned Parenthood. For three years, the Buckeyes have been fighting to redirect the $1.5 million for abortion providers to real health clinics. Buckeye leaders, including former Governor John Kasich, were sick of “using abortion providers as the face of state health care programs.” A lower court said too bad. But 11 judges on the Sixth Circuit disagreed, insisting that Ohio’s law doesn’t violate the Constitution “because the affiliates do not have a due process right to perform abortions.”
    .
    And while President Trump didn’t have anything to do with the ruling, he had plenty to do with the people who made it. Four of the 11 judges who defended Ohio’s law were appointed by this White House. If you’re wondering how much this administration’s commitment to nominations matters, this is proof. There are men and women on benches across America today who are literally saving lives because this president made the courts a priority. Thanks to Donald Trump, pro-lifers know better than anyone: you don’t need Congress to win on life.
    .
    Read More: https://www.lifenews.com/2019/03/15/...p-infanticide/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    When you didn’t think the Democrats couldn’t do anything more STUPID, here’s your sign.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  9. #98
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Minnesota Democrats Want To Topple Ilhan Omar And Nominate New Candidate
    .
    Minnesota Democrats who are angry and offended at Rep. Ilhan Omar for her string of comments about Jews and Israel are reportedly considering squelching her next nomination and running a different candidate in her place.
    .
    Those who want Omar replaced are looking for someone to contest her nomination and have been meeting to discuss that objective, The Hill reported Thursday.
    .
    It’s typcally difficult to replace an incumbent politician, even one as arguably polarizing as Omar, who in her first two months as a congresswoman has sparked contentious debates both as a country and within the party.
    .
    “There’s definitely some buzz going around about it, but it’s more a buzz of is anyone talking about finding someone to run against her than it is anyone saying they’re going to run against her or contemplate it,” Democratic state Sen. Ron Latz, whose district overlaps Omar’s federal constituency, told The Hill. “There’s definitely talk about people wanting someone to run against her.”
    .
    Omar has provoked accusations of anti-Semitism against her with her chiding of Israel, suggesting at one point that it had “hypnotized the world” and prayed that Allah would “awaken” it. She divided the Democratic Party last week over a resolution that was first meant to condemn anti-Semitism but became a reprimand against virtually every form of discrimination.
    .
    Minnesota’s Jewish community is increasingly frustrated with the comments coming from Omar, saying they have actively reached out to the congresswoman to express their concerns.
    .
    “Our community is exasperated by Rep. Omar’s unfulfilled promises to listen and learn from Jewish constituents while seemingly simultaneously finding another opportunity to make an anti-Semitic remark and insult our community,” Steve Hunegs, executive director of the Jewish Community Relations Council of Minnesota and the Dakotas, told The Hill.
    .
    Favorites to replace Omar include state Sen. Bobby Joe Champion and Minneapolis City Councilwoman Andrea Jenkins, according to The Hill.
    .
    Read More: https://conservativemedia.us/politic...new-candidate/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    Well it’s a little late for that, now we’ll have to put up with her BS for two more years.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  10. #99
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    Beto O’Rourke Wrote Fantasy About Murdering Children, Report Says
    .
    A new report from Reuters reveals more skeletons from former Congressman Beto O’Rourke’s (D-TX) past, including disturbing writings from when he was a teenager.
    .
    In a profile that also documented O’Rourke’s involvement in a hacker group, Reuters reported: “it’s unclear whether the United States is ready for a presidential contender who, as a teenager, stole long-distance phone service for his dial-up modem, wrote a murder fantasy in which the narrator drives over children on the street, and mused about a society without money.”
    .
    In writings that Reuters says still exist online, O’Rourke reportedly fantasized about “toppling the government,” but doubted that “the masses would support such a radical move at this time.”
    .
    O’Rourke also reportedly wrote about murdering children by running them over with a car.
    .
    “One day, as I was driving home from work, I noticed two children crossing the street,” O’Rourke wrote. “They were happy, happy to be free from their troubles …This happiness was mine by right. I had earned it in my dreams.”
    .
    “As I neared the young ones, I put all my weight on my right foot, keeping the accelerator pedal on the floor until I heard the crashing of the two children on the hood, and then the sharp cry of pain from one of the two,” O’Rourke continued. “I was so fascinated for a moment, that when after I had stopped my vehicle, I just sat in a daze, sweet visions filling my head.”
    .
    The disturbing writings are just the latest in a long line of stories about O’Rourke that center around his driving.
    .
    On the night of his 26th birthday, O’Rourke hit another vehicle while he was driving drunk. O’Rourke claimed that he only had two beers, which The Washington Post has disputed:
    .
    When O’Rourke blew into a breathalyzer, the results were a blood alcohol content of 0.136 and 0.134. The legal state limit in Texas at the time was 0.10; a year later, it was lowered to 0.08. With a blood alcohol level of between 0.130 and 0.159, a person experiences “gross motor impairment and lack of physical control. Blurred vision and major loss of balance. Euphoria is reducing and beginning dysphoria (a state of feeling unwell).” For a male of 190 pounds, O’Rourke’s weight as listed in the police report, that blood alcohol concentration is reached after six drinks.
    .
    A reporter who was near the scene of the accident had to physically stop O’Rourke from fleeing the scene, which is documented in a police report of the incident.
    .
    O’Rourke then repeatedly lied about the incident during his failed Senate run in Texas last year against Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) — regarding which The Post give him “Four Pinocchios” in its “fact check.”
    .
    Also during his failed campaign last year, O’Rourke posted strange videos to his Twitter account in which he filmed himself talking to the camera while operating the vehicle he was driving.
    .
    An article from The American Council On Science And Health titled “Please, Beto O’Rourke, Drive Safely,” slammed O’Rourke for his reckless driving.
    .
    Read More: https://conservativemedia.us/politic...n-report-says/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    And this POS wants to be President, don’t think so.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  11. #100
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,037
    AOC; ILLEGAL ALIENS ARE ‘MY CONSTITUENTS’
    .
    Freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D., N.Y.) referred to illegal immigrants as her “constituents” during a Thursday House Oversight and Reform Committee hearing.
    .
    Ocasio-Cortez was questioning Wilbur Ross, President Donald Trump’s secretary of commerce, when she made the statement. She began by referencing remarks Republican Kris Kobach made while he was Kansas secretary of state. Kobach encouraged Trump early on in his administration to add a 2020 consensus question about citizenship.
    .
    “Kobach said, ‘I raised the issue with the president shortly after he was inaugurated’ and ‘he was absolutely interested in this,'” Ocasio-Cortez said. “Shortly thereafter, in April of 2017, Steve Bannon asked you to speak with Mr. Kobach about his ‘ideas about including a citizenship question on the 2020 decennial census.'”
    .
    Ross acknowledged he did speak with Kobach early on in the administration, but he was cut off by Ocasio-Cortez before he could clarify what exactly the conversation was about. “I’m sorry, I must reclaim my time,” Ocasio-Cortez said.
    .
    “Mr. Kobach later sent an email to you on July 14, writing that the lack of the citizenship question ‘leads to the problem that aliens who do not actually reside in the United States are still counted for congressional apportionment services,'” she said.
    .
    “Of course they do reside in the United States. They reside in my district. They’re my constituents,” she said of illegal aliens. Ocasio-Cortez has been an outspoken critic of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), saying the agency responsible for enforcing U.S. immigration laws has “systematically violated human rights” and caused “death.”
    .
    Video:
    .
    Read More: https://rickwells.us/ocasio-cortez-i...-constituents/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    This goes hand in hand with Pelosi’s remarks in wanting her “New Comers (illegal immigrants) to the US being able to vote”.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

Page 10 of 78 FirstFirst ... 891011122060 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast