The Democrat Party - Page 77
Page 77 of 87 FirstFirst ... 27677576777879 ... LastLast
Results 761 to 770 of 867

Thread: The Democrat Party

  1. #761
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    If it doesn't strike you as odd that after every weirdo thing Biden has said or done, just in the last weekend, let alone the past with the inappropriate touching/kissing, that he is still ahead in the "polls", and you haven't realized that the DNC is corrupt and the media is a propaganda arm of the democratic party, you my friend are not only in denial, you are blind.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #762
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    Never forget that THIS is our Governor...

    Never forget he is for legal infanticide / genocide of our most vulnerable.
    Never forget he is for sanctuary cities for illegals.
    Never forget that he is for felons voting in elections or that he wants to eliminate any requirement for a legal ID at polling places.

    But most of all......NEVER forget his stated goal to destroy YOUR 2nd Amendment rights. To turn you into a felon, to confiscate your property and even the time honored tradition of teaching someone to shoot into a felony. He and the Democrats in Richmond are at war with your liberties backed by the carpetbagger Bloomberg's money.

    He is an embarrassment to the Commonwealth and a enemy to freedom and liberty......

    The Democrat Party-321b.jpg
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  4. #763
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    Whistleblower Did Not Disclose Meetings With Schiff's Office in Complaint

    In their complaint filed to the intelligence community inspector general, the infamous whistleblower who was responsible for sparking the impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump, failed to disclose their contacts with Rep. Adam Schiff's office.

    Catherine Herridge brought this key information to our attention in a tweet, linking to a CBS article published in late November. Herridge noted that the whistleblower ignored sections on the complaint by highlighting key sections of the complaint that were missed.

    “As impeachment enters new phase, [whistleblower] did not initially disclose contact w/Schiff staff citing ‘guidance on a procedural question,’ ‘no substance of the actual disclosure was discussed,’ and ‘way the form question was worded,'” tweeted Herridge.

    CBS reports that the whistleblower “reached out to the intelligence community watchdog on October 8 to clarify the nature of his or her contact with Democratic majority staff of the House Intelligence Committee before the complaint was filed.”

    The whistleblower bizarrely alleges that they left out their contact with Schiff's office on the complaint because “no substance of the actual disclosure was discussed,” it wasn't “necessary.”

    “The whistleblower acknowledged reaching out to the committee, but claimed that nothing substantial was discussed and that the staff member directed them to go through official channels, according to the ‘Memorandum of Investigative Activity,’ provided to House and Senate Intelligence Committee leadership by intelligence community inspector general (ICIG) Michael Atkinson,” CBS reports:

    According to the document, the whistleblower reported to the ICIG investigator that the committee staffer advised: “‘Do it right, hire a lawyer, and contact the ICIG.’ So that is what the COMPLAINANT did. At the time, COMPLAINANT did not even know what the ICIG was.”

    The whistleblower felt that “[b]ased on getting guidance on a procedural question, and that no substance of the actual disclosure was discussed, COMPLAINANT did not feel, based on the way the form question was worded, that it was necessary to check that box.”

    “That box” refers to the whistleblower disclosure form, which requires a detailed accounting of who is aware of the complaint. The box for “Congress or congressional committee(s)” was left blank by the whistleblower.

    The whistleblower's close connection with Schiff's office should be worrisome to all. Back in October, the New York Times highlighted this close connection, noting how the complaint was clearly conveyed to Schiff's office.

    The Democratic head of the House Intelligence Committee, Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, learned about the outlines of a C.I.A. officer’s concerns that President Trump had abused his power days before the officer filed a whistle-blower complaint, according to a spokesman and current and former American officials.

    The early account by the future whistle-blower shows how determined he was to make known his allegations that Mr. Trump asked Ukraine’s government to interfere on his behalf in the 2020 election. It also explains how Mr. Schiff knew to press for the complaint when the Trump administration initially blocked lawmakers from seeing it.

    The C.I.A. officer approached a House Intelligence Committee aide with his concerns about Mr. Trump only after he had had a colleague first convey them to the C.I.A.’s top lawyer. Concerned about how that initial avenue for airing his allegations through the C.I.A. was unfolding, the officer then approached the House aide. In both cases, the original accusation was vague.

    The House staff member, following the committee’s procedures, suggested the officer find a lawyer to advise him and meet with an inspector general, with whom he could file a whistle-blower complaint. The aide shared some of what the officer conveyed to Mr. Schiff. The aide did not share the whistle-blower’s identity with Mr. Schiff, an official said.

    Read More: https://trendingpolitics.com/breaking-whistleblower-did-not-disclose-meetings-with-schiff-s-office-in-complaint/?utm_source=fanclub&utm_medium=manychat

    My Thoughts:

    The truth is finally coming out. Schiff is behind everything connected to the whistleblower.

  5. #764
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    Here’s a heads up on Nadler’s impeachment show this Wednesday.

    All three people that are going to give testimony aren’t fact based witnesses. They are just going to give their opinion on what Trump did in the phone call to the Ukraine President, to which the President of Ukraine has stated multiple times that there wasn’t any quid Pro Quo requested by Trump.

    And all three of them are strident anti-Trump people and have voiced their hate for Trump ever since he got elected.

    So where is a fair and balanced deposition going to come from them, the answer is, it’s not.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  6. #765
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    It isn't just Bernie Sanders.
    Look at the vast majority of the Democratic Party's field for any limiting principle that would preclude even the most severe forms of gun control (like gun confiscation) and you will come up wanting.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  7. #766
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    Far, far left list of “professors, lawyers, activists, and dare say worse” who will testify for impeachment. What a witch hunt. Only thing good about this, the Democrats have exposed themselves.

    Desperate do anything to avoid the truth about Ukraine, the 2016 election, and the corrupt in their party who benefited from sweetheart deals. The Senate, the various agencies are unified in getting the truth out, and it will finally expose the Democrats for what they are. Not opinions but fact based truths.

    The inquisition by the socialists of the President, also is a rebuke of every conservative, every American who believe in our freedoms, especially a just and fair legal system. No matter what these professors of something have to say, they in fact do not support the principles of our constitution. If they did, they would not appear in this unfair procedure and process.

    The Democrat Party-321o.jpg
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  8. #767
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    A lot of the idiot morons on the MSM, CNN & MSNBC are saying that Kamala Harris pulled out of the Presidential campaign because people were racist and sexist, what you’re not hearing is, there calling their own Democratic people racist and sexist. WOW……..
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  9. #768
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    Nadler then and now: 1998 video shows Dem saying impeachment would ‘overturn’ will of voters

    House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler, D-N.Y., will on Wednesday pick up the baton from his Intelligence Committee counterpart Adam Schiff., D-Calif., as the House’s impeachment inquiry moves to the next step -- but it is a far cry for Nadler from 1998, when he warned that an impeachment would “overturn the popular will of the voters.”

    “The effect of impeachment is to overturn the popular will of the voters,” Nadler said on the House floor during the Clinton impeachment hearings, in footage unearthed by Grabien. "We must not overturn an election and remove a president from office except to defend our system of government or constitutional liberties against a dire threat, and we must not do so without an overwhelming consensus of the American people.”

    HOUSE DEMOCRATS RELEASE TRUMP IMPEACHMENT REPORT, BLAST SCHEME TO 'SOLICIT FOREIGN INTERFERENCE' IN 2020 RACE

    The Judiciary Committee will hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday, following the release of the Intelligence Committee’s report Tuesday into Trump’s alleged efforts to have Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden and alleged interference by Ukraine in the 2016 election.

    It will be with Nadler’s guidance under which the House may choose to draw up articles of impeachment against the president. Democrats, including Nadler, have supported the push toward impeachment, arguing that Trump’s July 25 phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was part of a quid pro quo for politically-motivated investigations in exchange for military funding.

    But during the 1998 Clinton impeachment hearings, Nadler struck a very different tone, arguing that impeachment should be avoided unless it has a bipartisan flavor -- something the current impeachment inquiry lacks.

    Trump: Impeachment hoax unifying Republicans like never beforeVideo
    “There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or an impeachment supported by one of our major political parties and opposed by the other,” he had said before warning of dire consequences if Republicans moved on with their push.

    “Such an impeachment will produce a divisiveness and bitterness in our politics for years to come and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions,” he said.

    JUDICIARY CHAIRMAN NADLER ACCUSED OF MUELLER REPORT AS VINTAGE VIDEO SURFACES FROM CLINTON DAYS

    Those remarks are likely to be used by Republicans to fuel their claim that the impeachment hearing is a politically-motivated stunt.

    Nadler has previously come under fire for past remarks contrasting with present behavior.

    In April, a video resurfaced that showed him urging caution in the release of details from the Starr report. The video emerged as he was moving to subpoena former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia report.

    Nadler maintained he has been consistent in both cases -- calling in 1998 and the present day for the committee to first review the documents, acknowledging in both cases concerns about the release of grand jury materials to the general public.

    Read More & watch video: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/nadler-then-now-1998-video-impeachment?fbclid=IwAR1FmxDb7f0N4JrPWhJ9mCybWLAXE b2wvCaOlPRygBcxFWrC8KD32LKHuYA


    My Thoughts:

    How do these folks sleep at night, or face themselves in the mirror??
    Nadler sure changed his opinion didn't he?

  10. #769
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    Rep. Doug Collins Reads Nadler Quotes and Destroys Impeachment Narrative

    With the Democrats’ own words being used against them, and a lack of any fact witnesses, the American public will definitely not buy into this impeachment hoax.

    Georgia Representative Doug Collins, who the Georgia Governor chose not to appoint to the Senate today, dismantled the Democrats’ impeachment narrative by reading multiple quotes from the Democratic Chairman Rep. Nadler’s previous comments on impeachment. In 1998, Rep. Nadler fiercely attacked the impeachment of President Bill Clinton but has since done a complete 180 on how he believes impeachment proceedings should proceed.

    Rep. Collins started by saying, “I also see quotes like this. ‘There must never be a narrowly voted impeachment or impeachment supported by a major political party or imposed by another. It will produce bitterness in politics for years to come and will call into question the very legitimacy of our political institutions. American people are watching; they’ll not forget. You have the votes. You may have the muscle, but you do not have the legitimacy of a national consensus or constitutional impairment.”

    Collins continued, “The coup d’etat will go down in infamy in the history of the Nation.’ How about this one. “I think the key point is the Republicans are running a railroad job with no attempt at fair procedure.”

    “Today, when the Democrats offered amendments, motions in committee to say we should first adopt standards, so we know what we’re dealing with, standards for impeachment that were voted down or ruled out of order. When we say the important thing is to start looking at the question before we have a vote with no inquiry, that was voted down. That’s all we discussed. The essential question, here it is, to set up a fair process as to whether the country put this country through an impeachment proceeding, that was ruled out of order. The Republicans refused to let us discuss it.’ Those are all, chairman Nadler before he was chairman. I guess 20 years makes a difference.”

    Rep. Collins concluded, “There are no set facts here. There is not anything that presents an impeachment here except a president carrying out his job in the way the Constitution saw that he sees fit to do it. This is where we’re at today. The interesting thing I come to with most everybody here is this may be a new time and place and we may be looking pretty for impeachment. This is not an impeachment. This is just a simple railroad job. And today’s is a waste of time. Because this is where we’re at. So I close today with this, it didn’t start with Mueller, a phone call. Do you know where this started? It started with tears in Brooklyn in November 2016. When an election was lost. So we’re here, no plan, no fact witnesses, simply being a rubber stamp for what we have. Hey, we got law professors here. What a start of a party.”

    With the Democrats’ own words being used against them, and a lack of any fact witnesses, the American public will definitely not buy into this impeachment hoax, just like they did not buy into the Witch Hunt.

    Read More & watch video: https://thegreggjarrett.com/rep-doug-collins-reads-nadler-quotes-destroys-impeachment-narrative/

    My Thoughts:

    That POS Nadler can’t have it both ways.

  11. #770
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,312
    This entire impeachment fiasco by the Dems is just a grab bag of opinions, hearsays, Trump made us mad, and nothing more.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

Page 77 of 87 FirstFirst ... 27677576777879 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast