Top FBI Official Tells-All Obama Worked With The British To Conspire Against Trump
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Top FBI Official Tells-All Obama Worked With The British To Conspire Against Trump

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    13,493

    Top FBI Official Tells-All Obama Worked With The British To Conspire Against Trump

    Top FBI Official Tells-All – Testifies That Obama Worked With The British To Conspire Against Trump!
    .
    On Tuesday, Rep. Doug Collins (R-GA) released the second part of the June 2018 closed-door testimony of Bill Priestap, the Assistant Director of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Division.
    .
    Real Clear Investigations’ Eric Felten wrote an excellent piece on Friday in which he covers Priestap’s entire testimony which can be read here and provides some interesting analysis. I will be focusing on Rep. Jim Jordan’s (R-OH) questioning of Priestap’s trips to London and what role British intelligence may have played in the conspiracy. Felten believes Priestap’s testimony “paints a portrait of the Obama-era bureau as one that was unconcerned with political interference in investigations and was willing to enlist the help of close foreign allies to bring down its target.”
    .
    Last fall, ahead of the midterms, President Trump announced his plan to declassify the FISA Court applications for the Carter Page surveillance warrant and related documents so the American people would know how everything went down. Nothing ever came of it. There were rumors that MI6, as well as the Australian intelligence service, had objected strenuously to the release of those records because it would, naturally, expose sources and methods.
    .
    It was said at the time that the Brits were “desperate” for the information to remain classified. The reason for their desperation? Although there is insufficient evidence to prove it, it sure looks like British intelligence agents were involved in the FBI’s operation to destroy Trump’s candidacy.
    .
    Priestap was questioned by Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) about his overseas travel in 2016. Felten said the redactions in the transcript make it obvious that the FBI and DOJ “really, really didn’t want anyone to know where Bill Priestap was a week into May 2016.”
    .
    Jordan: Do you ever travel oversees?
    .
    Priestap: Yes.
    .
    Jordan: How often?
    .
    Priestap: As little as possible.
    .
    Jordan: How many times during your 2½ years running the counter-intelligence shop have you traveled abroad?
    .
    Priestap: I want to say three times.
    .
    Jordan: And can you tell me where you went?
    .
    Priestap: The ones I’m remembering are the [REDACTED].
    .
    Jordan: All three times to [REDACTED]?
    .
    Priestap: Off the top of my head were all [REDACTED].”
    .
    Jordan: Do you remember when you went to this place?
    .
    Priestap: No.
    .
    Felten explains that Jordan later questioned Priestap about his overseas travel again, trying to determine where and when. Felten writes, “Over and again, censors from the FBI and DOJ have redacted the location and the time. What could this exotic destinationbe? How is the timing of Priestap’s trip there a matter of national security? What secrets were the redactors trying to protect?”
    .
    A transcript of text messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and lawyer Lisa Page answers these questions:
    .
    It’s right there on the page detailing texts between Strzok and Page on May 4, 2016. At around 9:31 that Wednesday evening, Strzok writes to say he is worried about getting a memo into shape that is expected that night or the next morning. He feels pressured even though “I don’t know that Bill will read it before he gets back from London next week.” Go to a text from the next Monday morning, May 9, and Strzok is wondering who will be receiving the daily report on the Clinton investigation, what “with Bill out.”
    .
    So there we have it. Bill Priestap was in London on or around May 9. Which strongly suggests that all three of the international trips taken by him during his tenure as FBI counterintelligence chief were to London.
    .
    Jordan: Okay. So what were you doing in [REDACTED] in the [REDACTED] of 2016?
    .
    Priestap: So, I went to meet with a foreign partner, foreign government partner.”
    .
    Felten analyzes this. “In other words, almost certainly British intelligence. Not exposing our British partners has been the Justice Department’s justification for locking up secrets about the beginnings of the Trump investigation. The redactions try and fail to hide that Priestap met repeatedly with his British counterparts in 2016.” Felten adds:
    .
    Students of the Russia-collusion saga will recall that some of the earliest and most significant events cited as leading to the FBI’s investigation of Team Trump took place in a certain REDACTED country during a REDACTED season in 2016. It was over breakfast on April 26 in London that the mysterious Maltese professor, Joseph Mifsud, told young Trump campaign adviser George Papadopoulos that the Russians had “dirt” on Hillary Clinton. Five days later, on May 1, Papadopoulos had drinks with Australian diplomat Alexander Downer in a London bar where he shared this piece of gossip/intel. And, of course, London is home to the author of the anti-Trump “dossier,” Christopher Steele.
    .
    According to the official story laid out in the New York Times, Australian officials did not pass on this new information for two months. And while Steele was retained by the opposition research firm Fusion GPS in the spring to dig up dirt on Trump for the Clinton campaign, the official story is that he did not start working with U.S. officials until the summer.
    .
    And so it is more than passingly curious that Priestap kept going to London when these significant events were occurring.
    .
    Jordan: What did it have to do with?
    .
    Priestap: I’m not at liberty to discuss that today.
    .
    Jordan: Was your second trip then concerning the Trump-Russia investigation?
    .
    Priestap: Sir, again, I’m just not at liberty to go into the purpose of my second trip.
    .
    Felten deduces that “Priestap could have answered “no” without perjuring himself, he could have quickly put this matter to bed. His “I’m not at liberty” answers strongly suggest that the Trump-Russia investigation was exactly what his second trip to London was about.”
    .
    Although Priestap tries hard not to provide lawmakers with any concrete information, the head of the counterintelligence division would not make three trips to London during a critical period unless there was an important reason.
    .
    Unrelated to Priestap’s testimony, we know the FBI opened their counterintelligence investigation into Trump/Russia collusion, Crossfire Hurricane, on July 31, 2016. Strzok signed the authorization and immediately hopped on a plane to London. He was accompanied by another FBI official whose name was redacted. It was not Priestap, however, because upon his return, text messages show that Strzok planned to brief both Priestap and George Toscas, the Deputy Attorney General in charge of the DOJ’s National Security Division about the trip. Nor was it Lisa Page, with whom he was texting from the cab on his way home from the airport.
    .
    We know that Trump campaign advisor George Papadopoulos was lured to London on the pretense of delivering a foreign policy paper and paid $3,000 by FBI informant Stefan Halper. Also, Joseph Mifsud, “who mixed with Britain’s foreign secretary and ex-CIA people,” approached Papadopoulos in London to inform him that the Russian government had dirt on Hillary Clinton. Australian diplomat Alexander Downer, a well connected former ambassador to the U.K., invited Papadopoulos for drinks at a London bar shortly after Mifsud had spoken to him. And, of course, the author of the Trump dossier, Christopher Steele, was a former British spy.
    .
    It’s pretty clear that members of the British intelligence community and others connected to them were involved in the framing of Donald Trump. What we don’t know is the extent of it.
    .
    But every transcript and document fills in another blank. Most of us never believed any of this would see the light of day. Looks like the winds have changed.
    .
    Read More: https://en-volve.com/2019/04/13/top-...against-trump/
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    With everything that has been coming out in the news showing the various illegal activities that the FBI & DOJ have been conducting to undermine the Trump Presidency, it’s paramount that AG Barr get started on doing an correct investigation into everyone that committed these illegal activities and indict them, send them to a federal grand jury and when found to have committed a crime, arrest them (no matter how high up the food chain they area) arrest them, charge them and take them to trial.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    13,493
    It’s About Time: DOJ To Investigate Obama
    .
    For two years, the political world has been focused on the Mueller investigation.
    .
    The media had been waiting with bated breath for the conclusions of the Mueller report.
    .
    They were absolutely sure that Mueller was going to prove that Trump had worked with the Russians to defeat Hillary Clinton.
    .
    However, they were severely disappointed. Mueller found no evidence that Trump was a puppet of Vladimir Putin.
    .
    Now the tables are being turned.
    .
    Attorney General William Barr testified in front of Congress yesterday that he intended to look into whether Barack Obama’s administration spied on the Trump campaign in 2016.
    .
    Barr told the lawmakers that he “believed spying had occurred.”
    .
    He then told the committee that he was “preparing to review ‘both the genesis and the conduct of intelligence activities directed at the Trump campaign,’ including improper spying by American intelligence agencies.”
    .
    This has been a long time coming. There is far more information that points towards nefarious activity on the part of the Obama administration and DNC than the Trump campaign.
    .
    The attorney general said that he “will work with FBI director, Christopher A. Wray, to examine the origins of the bureau’s counterintelligence investigation of the Trump campaign and that he would soon set up a team for that effort.”
    .
    Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) is leading the charge for an Obama investigation in the Senate. Graham has called for the attorney general to appoint a special counsel to determine whether the
    .
    Obama administration unlawfully obtained a warrant to spy on a Trump official as a way to help Hillary Clinton.
    .
    Graham is the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. He has said he is prepared to hold hearings on the topic. He told reporters: “What makes sense to me is that all of the abuse by the
    .
    Department of Justice and the FBI, the unprofessional conduct, the shady behavior — nobody seems to think that’s much important. Well, that’s going to change, I hope.”
    .
    It is time for Barack Obama to be asked what he knew. It is inconceivable that a sitting president had no idea that a major intelligence investigation was being conducted against the Republican nominee for president.
    .
    Let’s review how the witch hunt began.
    .
    Hint: It wouldn’t have been possible without the Hillary Clinton campaign and Obama administration.
    .
    The Clinton campaign is the only campaign from 2016 that colluded with foreign agents. This has been documented. Her campaign paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump.
    .
    Christopher Steele — a British MI6 investigator — made up bogus claims of collusion between Trump and Russia.
    .
    The FBI used this dossier to file for a FISA warrant to investigate the Trump campaign, via Carter Page. That is where the Obama administration comes into the story.
    .
    Keep in mind that Page has never been charged with any crime.
    .
    If you believe this, the Left calls you a “conspiracy nut.”
    .
    That is what they did to conservative radio and TV host Mark Levin. Levin accused the intelligence agencies of staging a “silent coup” against the president of the United States.
    .
    He was laughed out of town and made fun of by people on both the Right and the Left. He simply pieced together reporting done by the mainstream media — the same people that were calling him a conspiracy loon.
    .
    However, two years later … it looks like Levin may have been right all along.
    .
    It’s about time that the Justice Department investigates the prior administration. It is refreshing to see an attorney general who is actually doing his job.
    .
    William Barr is off to a good start in his position.
    .
    Read More: https://freedomwire.com/its-about-ti...rticle-Traffic
    .
    My Thoughts:
    .
    No sh!t Sherlock, it sure is & way past time some people pay for all of the illegal actions that were done against President Trump.
    .
    This has got to be the closest thing to military overthrow against a sitting President.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast