A great read from a guy who "gets it"
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: A great read from a guy who "gets it"

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    134

    A great read from a guy who "gets it"

    This is a little long but I think it's a great read.


    Obama, Get Real on “Assault Weapons,” Put a Cork in Holder
    We can't define an "assault weapon, " so put energy into something that doesn't punish law-abiding sportsmen and gun owners and might actually lower violent crime rates.

    Link found here: Obama, Get Real on “Assault Weapons,” Put a Cork in Holder | Travel & Outdoors | New West Network


    By Bill Schneider, 3-05-09



    I went to my first gun show a couple of weeks ago, but when I wrote about it, I left out the buzz concerning the proposed reauthorization of the so-called “Assault Weapon Ban (AWB).” I have a lot to say about it, so I saved it for this column.

    For starters, with all the massive messes the Obama administration has to unravel, why is our new president allowing his attorney general to embark on a meaningless mission to nowhere? And in conflict with his campaign commitments and his party’s plans to stay in power?

    Of all the press releases I’ve received from the gun lobby on this issue, I thought the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF), a trade group for firearms manufacturers, had the most reasonable summation. The NSSF reminded Congress that “such a ban would cause jobs to be lost in a difficult economy, have no effect on reducing crime and would deprive millions of law-abiding sportsmen and gun owners of their Constitutional right to own the firearm of their choice.”

    That sums it up, but I can add one more. It’s a political folly with no chance of passing.

    When announcing his plan, Holder justified it by saying we needed to stop American criminals from supplying illegal guns to drug dealers in Mexico.
    Wouldn’t that a laugher to brighten your day during these dismal times, if the Attorney General of the United States didn’t actually, apparently, believe it. Be real. The AWB has nothing to do with Mexico.

    “The problem of criminals breaking the law to acquire firearms and illegally smuggling them across the border is not remedied by legislation that would violate the rights of Americans to own semi-automatic firearms,” agrees Steve Sanetti, NSSF president. “We can only conclude that certain officials (translate: Eric Holder) are waiting for any politically advantageous excuse to announce the intention to seek a new ban on sporting rifles, a ban that would break the president’s campaign promise to gun owners that ‘I’m not going to take away your guns.’”

    Here’s my summation. Any attempts to reauthorize the AWB is an impossible mission with no chance of achieving the intended results (i.e. stopping crime) and counterproductive to efforts by politicians, mostly Democrats, to get re-elected.

    So why do it? The only answer can be political pay back. All those gunshy urbanites voted for Obama, and they think the AWB might keep crazies from shooting up schools and malls. Now, through his attorney general, Obama has to give them something in return. No matter that we saw no decrease in school or mall shootings or any other gun-related crime during the ten years (1994-2004) the AWB was in effect. And there has been no increase in the five years since it expired.

    Is there anything else we need to know about the AWB?

    As I’ve proved several times in this column, I’m not a gun expert, but I’ve learned one thing. It’s impossible to define an “assault weapon,” ballistically or physically, and when you try, you sweep up commonly used sporting firearms like semi-automatic hunting rifles and pump-action shotguns used for bird hunting and trap shooting, firearms perfectly acceptable to most people, even many serious anti-gunners.

    And even if you could define an “assault weapon” in legalese, the manufacturers could and would instantly make subtle design adjustments to land outside of the ban.

    (Don’t, incidentally, confuse Holder’s push for the AWB with legislation already in Congress, H.R. 45, ironically sponsored by Bobby Rush, D-Ill, the guy who whopped Obama in his first election, which requires firearm registration and photographing, fingerprinting and testing for anybody who tries to buy a gun--another unneeded gun bill that deserves a quick and decisive death.)

    Holder’s AWB might have a chance of getting a hearing in the House of Representatives. The House could conceivably pass it, but it faces certain death in the Senate, even as a rider on a must-pass spending bill. So, President Obama, I suggest checking which way the political winds are blowing and then cut your losses before letting fruitless efforts to control gun owners go any further.

    As I’ve asserted in the past, we’ve essentially won the war for guns and the Second Amendment. Politicians, including many Democrats, are simply sick of the gun issue and refuse to be put in the politically risky position of having to vote either for or against gun control, knowing they’d suffer the wrath of one side of the issue. Hence, the extreme unlikelihood of even having a committee vote on the AWB or H.R. 45.

    Even House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), commonly considered anti-gun, has backed away from prospect of new gun legislation. “On that score, I think we need to enforce the laws we have right now,” she announced, surprisingly taking the same position of pro-gun groups.

    Witness the recent vote on the new Washington D.C. gun regulations. In an act of defiance after the Supremes overturned the ultra-strict D.C. firearms ordinances in the landmark Heller vs. D.C. case last year, the city council passed regulations almost as restrictive. But last week, the U.S. Senate voted 62-36 to overturn those new regs--and with a bipartisan vote. Twenty-two democratic senators, including Senate majority leader Harry Reid (D-NV), joined Republicans in sending the big message to the D.C. city council.

    Backers of such sure-to-fail legislative efforts like the AWB should consider how counterproductive it can be. With gun sales already through the ceiling even in a bad economy, the threat of new laws like the AWB and H.R. 45 only further boast sales, putting even more guns into circulation. When and if it gets introduced, perhaps anti-gun groups should title the AWB bill the Gun Sales Promotion Act of 2009.

    We probably don’t need another reason to spike the AWB, but here’s one more. How many segments of our economy are doing well nowadays? Not many, right? One is the firearms industry. So, should Congress pass legislation like the AWB to purposely send even more thousands of American workers to the unemployment lines?

    “A ban on sporting firearms also would have a severe effect on jobs and the economy,” says NSSF. “Sales of semi-automatic rifles have been strong over the last several months--overall sales of firearms have increased as much as 42 percent--and have allowed the firearms industry to withstand, to some extent, the downturn in the economy.”

    “These semi-automatic rifles are the most popular rifle in America today and they are largely behind the recent increase in firearms sales,” adds Sanetti. “This is a bright spot in our economy and has helped save jobs in our industry.”

    So, Congress, do you really want to slap down one of the few industries still running close to full employment?

    I only hope Holder’s pronouncement was merely a token political balloon put out there to appease the gun-hating constituency with no intention to push hard for it. If not, well, I see it as a serious broken promise by Obama who came to New West several times during his campaign and promised hunters and gun owners that they had nothing to fear from him.

    President Obama, you have plenty of reasons to not-so-quietly tell Congress to forget about the AWB (and H.R. 45) and put a cork in Eric Holder.

    "Common Sense" gun laws. Common sense tells me that the gun didn't carry itself to the crime scene and pull it's own trigger. Punish the criminals, not the guns!

  2.   
  3. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Indianapolis
    Posts
    244
    well said. Thanks for the link
    M1 Garand, Kimber Custom Carry II, Ruger P-95, Mossberg Persuader 12ga., Charles Daly 12ga(My gobbler gobbler)
    http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/10/311.html

  4. #3
    well rest assured that obama did not actually mean that he doesn't intend to take away our guns.. he only said that after the DC case... yet looking at his voting record we see that anything "gun grabbing" that needed to be voted on he voted to grab them.. and now that the economy issue is well out in front of everything else it gives him a perfect shield to be sneaky behind. so he may say one thing.. but I am glad to see that so many people are watching him closely.
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  5. #4
    wolfhunter Guest
    Good article. Thanks for posting.

  6. #5
    I have a feeling that this is a smokescreen. Obama is charging full speed ahead to turn this nation into a socialist state. This "false flag" by Holder is a good way of keeping a large part of the Constitution-loving part of America wound up on a non-issue and diverting their attention from the things he is doing to the economy and healthcare. Guns can wait until the entire nation is demoralized by a crashed economy.

    The Obama administration is not incompetent or amateurish, this is part of a well conceived long range plan to remake America in the image of Marxism.
    John - KJ4NSE
    Member NRA | GCO | GOA | SAF | ARRL
    Why would God invent something like whiskey? To keep the Irish from ruling the world of course.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast