Gun ban gets shut down - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22

Thread: Gun ban gets shut down

  1. #11
    Did i read this right?
    while Speaker Nancy Pelosi—echoing the NRA's mantra on all gun-control issues—said she backed "enforcing the laws we have now."


  3. Quote Originally Posted by S&WM&P40 View Post
    Did i read this right?
    Yes you did, she may not be as dumb as she appears after all, remember this is politics the goal is to live off of the tax payers in order to do that you need to get reelected. With 75% of the public believing that they have the right to to keep and bear it is political suicide to say otherwise.

  4. #13
    Friday March 27th, 2009

    Los Angeles Mayor Calls For Immediate Weapons Ban:

    LA Officials Ask for Federal Ban on Assault Weapons | NBC Los Angeles

    Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and City Councilman Jack Weiss on Friday called for the federal government to reinstate a ban on assault weapons.

    "This morning we are calling on Congress and the Obama administration to make gun control a top priority now and to reauthorize the assault weapons ban right away," - LA Mayor Villaraigosa ... Continued at:
    LA Officials Ask for Federal Ban on Assault Weapons | NBC Los Angeles

  5. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Иєш Лєяжşєşŧăŋ
    Quote Originally Posted by rockwerks View Post
    . . .she may not be as dumb as she appears after all . . .
    Aww, sure she is! Don't sell her short!
    NRA Life; GOA Life; CCRKBA Life; Trustee, NJCSD; F&AM: 32 & KT
    The Only Answer to a Bad Guy with a Gun - Is a Good Guy with a Gun!
    When Seconds Count...The Police are only MINUTES Away!

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Creswell, Oregon
    I did hear there is a bill being circulated in Washington DC, don't know what the number is, that will require all guns to be registered and you will be required to have a permit to buy ammo. They don't have to ban the gun, just control the ammo.
    "You can get a lot accomplished if you don't care who gets the credit" - Ronald Reagan

  7. #16
    And we are to believe that Suddenly Nancy Pelosi has gone from her 100% anti-second amendment to supporting it?

    Speaker Nancy Pelosi (CA-D)

    just a small sample of Gun Ban Pelosi's perfect F record of opposing the second amendment as written...

    • Voted NO on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers. (Oct 2005)
    • Voted NO on prohibiting suing gun makers & sellers for gun misuse. (Apr 2003)
    • Voted NO on decreasing gun waiting period from 3 days to 1. (Jun 1999)
    • Rated F by the NRA, indicating a pro-gun control voting record. (Dec 2003)
    • The democratic congresswoman from California is rabidly anti-gun. She is an avowed socialist who is F- rated by Gun Owners of America.

    Consider that Speaker Pelosi was one of only 99 Representatives who voted IN FAVOR of gun confiscation in July 2006. That vote saw more than 300 congressmen cast their ballots to prohibit federal agents from stealing firearms from law-abiding citizens. It was truly an overwhelming majority who supported the Second Amendment rights of Americans.

    But in that July 2006 vote, Nancy Pelosi joined the hard core left in Congress to SUPPORT gun confiscation. She actually voted to let government agents burst into your home and steal your firearms!

    Still think you can believe Speaker Pelosi will oppose second amendment infringements that come to the floor of the house?

    Just wait for the next second amendment infringement to come out of the House/Senate buried in some 1000+ page bill (that no body reads), stimulus package or some other tax & spend, budget bill...

    Just like Bin Laden used the news to figure out what he should and should not do in his next attack, the Obamanation, aka the USURPER which includes his Gun Ban Generals like Holder, Clinton, Pelosi, Feinstein, Boxer, McCarthy, Schumer, Kerry, and his 6 figure campaign contributors like the Brady Campaign aka VPC, is jabbing, and moving, to see how we respond, to find out what approach they can take that we initially find the least offensive...

    The ultimate goal, be it disguised, as a health reform bill, some new unheard of tax & spend program, etc., is confiscation or the rendering useless of every single firearm not in police or military hands...

    This is the same approach that England, Canada, Australia, and the other countries that have banned your birth right to defend your life by any means necessary, using equal or greater force then can be brought against you by any threat foreign or domestic...

    This is the same kind of TYRANNY that Thomas Jefferson stated was just cause for a NEW DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE, A NEW AMERICAN TEA PARTY!

    YouTube - England Gun Ban Update

  8. #17
    Quote Originally Posted by johnsteele View Post
    Depending on the results of the 2010 midterms it may be back. I don't for a minute think the Dems have given up on this nor have they"learned their lesson from 1994."
    you are absolutely right. they'll be back with this garbage for sure.
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  9. Quote Originally Posted by Scarecrow View Post
    you are absolutely right. they'll be back with this garbage for sure.
    Well with the irresponsible spending going on we should be able to take a seat or 2 back. The country should be deep in rampant inflation at that time by because of all of the deficit spending.

  10. #19
    I think it's time we turn the tables. Currently we're holding our ground, and pretty well. But we can't win the war by being on the defensive. We should start pressing our Congressmen to start introducing more legislation to restore our freedoms. Imagine if a Congressman introduced a bill to abolish portions of the 1986 Firearm Owner Protection Act, which would allow the purchase of automatic weapons manufactured after then. Or how about a bill to replace the Federal Air Marshals by allowing CCW on aircraft.

    There are a lot of opportunities. Nationwide reciprocity and National Park carry is a good start.
    "When the outflow exceeds the inflow, the upkeep becomes the downfall"

  11. They may very well have given up on any further gun control regulation from Congress. I would actually feel better if the administration was pushing harder.
    At this point, I think it is more likely they will sneak it through in a UN treaty, probably focused on human rights or protect the children.
    They will then say the treaty supercedes the Constitution........

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts