FEDERAL COURT: SAF, Calguns Challenge Denial of Right to Bear Arms In California!!!! - Page 2
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 12 of 12

Thread: FEDERAL COURT: SAF, Calguns Challenge Denial of Right to Bear Arms In California!!!!

  1. Quote Originally Posted by rockwerks View Post
    The only problem is that these lawyers on only stating half of the equation. NOt only do we have the right to keep and bear arms as stated in Heller vs DC. but also we do not have a constitutional right for police protection. as in many cases the supreme court in july of 05 Castle Rock vs GonZales stated that:

    "The police have no obligation to protect individuals who, therefore, should defend themselves"


    these gun laws are taking away our rights to protect ourselves as the Supreme Court has said time and time again it is our obligation to do so
    How bass ackwards is that whole freakin' thing? Are they actually trying to thin out the law abiding herd?

  2.   
  3. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    993
    It's called Hypocrisy. It's the native tongue of the Left.
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast