The most likely course for gun control
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12

Thread: The most likely course for gun control

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Exclamation The most likely course for gun control

    1. Obama Signed the CIFTA Treaty (allowing the UN to impose it's will on the people of this great nation.)

    2. Franken takes a seat in the Senate and they ratify the treaty using the power of the fillibuster proof majority.(see we did not vote any new anti gun legislation did we...we are not the ones coming for your guns...the UN is...)

    3. The UN dispatches peace keepers to the USA in an attempt to enforce a peaceful confiscation of all "illegal" small arms, large knive and sharp pointy sticks.

    4. All hell breaks loose when the "racist teabagging rednecks{" (Janeane Garofalo Quote) who cling to guns and religion wake up and smell the coffee.
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

  2.   
  3. #2
    they are gonna need some thicker helmets!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    We would be better off with BORAT as PRESIDENT!!!!

  4. As many Democrats are pro gun, the majority isn't so filibuster proof. The treaty also has language that specifically allows lawful ownership. UN peacekeepers is a giant leap from there. THIS scenario is HIGHLY unlikely.

    However, the concept is valid. I believe they will try to outlaw guns and or ammo, probably one small piece at a time, so we must work dilligently and tirelessly to protect, preserve and restore our rights!!!

    UN troops are much more likely to come in due to civil unrest, race riots, etc. We have to watch our behavior a lot more than the other side. (How many of you know Melanie M. Schrey? If the Tea Parties were anti-gun protests how would the headlines read?) We have to have the rational and reasoned responses. We have to be better than they are. We have to work towards the best, and prepare for the worst.
    You can have peace. Or you can have freedom. Don't ever count on having both at once.
    Robert A. Heinlein

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Exclamation Actually this is very likely

    Quote Originally Posted by Wolfling68 View Post
    As many Democrats are pro gun, the majority isn't so filibuster proof. The treaty also has language that specifically allows lawful ownership. UN peacekeepers is a giant leap from there. THIS scenario is HIGHLY unlikely.

    However, the concept is valid. I believe they will try to outlaw guns and or ammo, probably one small piece at a time, so we must work dilligently and tirelessly to protect, preserve and restore our rights!!!

    UN troops are much more likely to come in due to civil unrest, race riots, etc. We have to watch our behavior a lot more than the other side. (How many of you know Melanie M. Schrey? If the Tea Parties were anti-gun protests how would the headlines read?) We have to have the rational and reasoned responses. We have to be better than they are. We have to work towards the best, and prepare for the worst.
    Tack the treaty ratification onto a piece of crisis legislation and it's a done deal. Bring in the peacekeepers to help with traffic and hoome to home searches katrina style and you are there.
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    993
    Obama never signed CIFTA. That was Clinton.

    We need an Amendment, law, regulation, that if a treaty is not fully ratified under the administration of the president who signed it, it's completely dead, hocus pocus, habeas corpus.
    When they "Nudge. Shove. Shoot.",
    Don't retreat. Just reload.

  7. #6

    UN Peacekeeper

    Blue helmets make good targets!

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    South Central Missouri
    Posts
    124
    Quote Originally Posted by CathyInBlue View Post
    We need an Amendment, law, regulation, that if a treaty is not fully ratified under the administration of the president who signed it, it's completely dead, hocus pocus, habeas corpus.
    Cathy... *Shakes head sadly* There you go, suggesting something that makes COMMON SENSE, to be applied in the arena of politics. Don't you know "Politics" and "Common Sense" are mutually exclusive?
    When it comes to handguns, there are Sig Sauers, then there's everything else.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Exclamation Clinton signed it as well as Obama

    Quote Originally Posted by CathyInBlue View Post
    Obama never signed CIFTA. That was Clinton.

    We need an Amendment, law, regulation, that if a treaty is not fully ratified under the administration of the president who signed it, it's completely dead, hocus pocus, habeas corpus.
    Clinton signed it and it was never ratified.
    Obama signed it when he was doing the south of the border apology tour and accepting Chavez hand in friendship.
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

  10. #9
    Another attempt at an end run around the Constitution.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gray Court, SC
    Posts
    2,934
    Let the Blue Helmets come. You know what happens when the going gets tough, the Blue Helmets pack up and leave. I doubt they would be on the streets a month.
    USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Benefactor
    To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast