Pelosi under investigation for lying about waterboarding - Page 2
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Thread: Pelosi under investigation for lying about waterboarding

  1. #11
    Quote Originally Posted by boris View Post
    1. GOOD!!let her sweat.
    2. milpers who go thru SERE get waterboarded as part of the class. worse than math i hear, but not unbearable. i understand it beats the heck out of wood being rammed under the fingernails.
    3. OPERATION : PHOENIX

    she just needs to go, mad or not. and take schmucky with her. they can kiss in the parking lot.
    I enjoy math, but I don't believe I'd enjoy waterboarding. Unfortunately, Pelosi and those like her can't tell the difference between making someone fear they will drown, and actually drowning them. It's okay with this mindset for victims to have nightmares for life, but don't ever let those who do harm worry how they'll be treated.

    She's an example of how out of touch the parties are. The registered Democrats in this country would never choose her for anything. But one small, strange part of America elected her to Congress. Her peers in Congress decided she should be the most important member of Congress. That alone should make all Democrats take a second look at the people they vote for...
    People don't like to be meddled with. We tell them what to do, what to think, don't run, don't walk. We're in their homes and in their heads and we haven't the right. We're meddlesome.--River Tam

  2.   
  3. #12

    So a woman that's smart enough to get elected to Speaker of the House

    She expects us to beleive that she is so nieve that she can be fooled by the CIA? That everyone else in charge of our government was fooled as well and none of them ever discussed the issue amongst themselves? She realy thinks the american public is stupid. That is arrogance and naricism to the extreme.

    Pelosi accuses CIA of lying in torture timeline
    Pelosi accuses CIA of lying in torture timeline
    Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau

    Friday, May 15, 2009

    (05-15) 04:00 PDT Washington - -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently said her motto is "The best preparation for combat is combat."

    With both guns blazing at an extraordinary news conference Thursday, the Democrat from San Francisco made good on that, accusing the CIA of lying when the agency said she was told about torture in 2002.

    In doing so, Pelosi turned a distraction into a conflagration. She had little choice after two weeks of Republican accusations that it was she who was lying, accompanied by a leaked CIA timeline that said she had been briefed on Sept. 4, 2002, that "enhanced interrogation techniques" - a euphemism for torture - "had been employed."

    Democrats quickly closed ranks behind the speaker. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, made clear whom she believes.

    "I've know Nancy a long time," Feinstein said. "We lived a few houses apart for a couple of decades. I've never known her not to be truthful. Let me put that on the record."

    Feinstein had this to say about the CIA, now headed by fellow Californian Leon Panetta of Monterey:

    "The CIA on this issue is in a defensive mode. Who knows whether what they're saying is right or wrong? The CIA is not an agency that is above not telling the truth."

    Republicans contend that Pelosi had known all along that that top al Qaeda suspects were being harshly interrogated for information on future plots, but only called it torture after the interrogations became public and inflamed her liberal base. They say it is unfair to investigate former Bush officials if Pelosi was also complicit.

    Pelosi waited for her regular weekly news conference to address the issue, after a trip to Iraq had left unanswered for nearly a week media reports fueled primarily by GOP sources making accusations.

    "Yes, I am saying that they are misleading - that the CIA was misleading the Congress," Pelosi said. She said she would "be very happy" if the CIA would release the notes from the 2002 briefing so that everyone could see for themselves. She repeated her call for a truth commission to air the facts.

    Rare political damage
    There is little doubt that Pelosi has sustained rare political damage, with even liberal late-night comedian Jon Stewart joking about her claim that Bush officials told her they had legal grounds to use torture but had not actually used it. The uproar has arrived at a delicate juncture when Pelosi faces a daunting challenge enacting President Obama's first-year agenda, including health care reform.

    Yet those who think Pelosi is in any danger of being driven from power, in the manner of such past speakers as Newt Gingrich or Jim Wright, underestimate her strength, steadily cultivated over 22 years in Congress since arriving as a San Francisco backbencher in 1987. Pelosi's hallmark achievement has been to unify Democrats, not just her Bay Area allies but conservative Southern and rural Democrats. There is no sign that they will abandon her now.

    Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, a top Pelosi confidant, said it was "ludicrous" to think Pelosi is in any political danger. "Obviously, it's an attempt by the architects and promoters of torture to try somehow to shift the blame to Democrats when for six, seven years, this is what they did," Miller said. "She's made her statement, and she made her record very clear."

    Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, said he was "a little shocked" when asked three days ago whether Pelosi was in trouble. So Thursday, as the Pelosi news conference was blaring on every cable TV network, he said, "I've been asking around on the (House) floor, and people just look at me like I'm nuts."

    If anything, Pelosi's no-prisoners stance may build support for the truth commission she has advocated to determine how decisions about the wars in Iraq and on terror were made. Her call for such a commission last month touched off the storm that has now engulfed her.

    Pelosi accused the Bush administration of "misinforming" Congress not only about torture but about weapons of mass destruction as a way of pushing its war agenda with minimal interference from Congress.

    "Let's get it straight," she said. "The Bush administration has conceived a policy. The CIA comes to the Congress, withholds information about the timing and the use of (torture). We later find out that it had been taking place before they even briefed us about the legal opinions and told us that they were not being used."


    GOP leader's perspective
    Republican House leader John Boehner of Ohio said Pelosi's responses "continue to raise more questions than provide answers." He said it is "hard for me to imagine that anyone in our intelligence area would ever mislead a member of Congress."

    Marc Sandalow, former Washington bureau chief for The Chronicle who covered Pelosi for 20 years and wrote her biography, "Madame Speaker," in 2008, said that what is clear is that "somebody's not telling the truth, either Nancy Pelosi or somebody at the CIA. And there is nothing in Nancy Pelosi's long public history to suggest that she lies. Hardball politics, yes. Lying, no."

    Pelosi is also a notorious stickler for protocol. It comes as little surprise that she would leave it to her successor on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County), to send a letter to the White House objecting to the techniques after a later and apparently more complete briefing on Feb. 5, 2003, which Pelosi's national security aide attended.

    Feinstein has opened what she expects to be a six- to eight-month Senate Intelligence Committee investigation of the interrogations. She opposes a truth commission because her committee can look at secret documents and take less time. With a commission, she said, "I don't think you'll really get a professional job. I think you'll get a very controversial work product. Now, our work product may be controversial, but it will be sound."

    Echoing the concerns of many members on the House and Senate intelligence committees, she said her own experience with CIA briefings is that they tend to be "very bland, very theoretical and with very little said. You cannot take notes. ... There is no opportunity for a lot of questions."

    Push to expand briefings
    Feinstein and others are pushing legislation to expand such briefings to the full intelligence committees, including professional staff. Some experts concur that limiting briefings to as few as four members of Congress who are sworn to absolute secrecy obstructs Congress' obligation to oversee the executive branch.

    The controversy puts Panetta in a difficult spot, defending the CIA against a fellow Californian. In a letter accompanying the timeline that implicates Pelosi, Panetta said the information is based on the best recollections of the CIA briefers at the time and may not be accurate.

    E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at [email protected].

    This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    A citizen who shirks his duty to contribute to the security of his community is little better than the criminal who threatens it.

  4. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by chroode View Post
    She expects us to beleive that she is so nieve that she can be fooled by the CIA? That everyone else in charge of our government was fooled as well and none of them ever discussed the issue amongst themselves? She realy thinks the american public is stupid. That is arrogance and naricism to the extreme.

    Pelosi accuses CIA of lying in torture timeline
    Pelosi accuses CIA of lying in torture timeline
    Carolyn Lochhead, Chronicle Washington Bureau

    Friday, May 15, 2009

    (05-15) 04:00 PDT Washington - -- House Speaker Nancy Pelosi recently said her motto is "The best preparation for combat is combat."

    With both guns blazing at an extraordinary news conference Thursday, the Democrat from San Francisco made good on that, accusing the CIA of lying when the agency said she was told about torture in 2002.

    In doing so, Pelosi turned a distraction into a conflagration. She had little choice after two weeks of Republican accusations that it was she who was lying, accompanied by a leaked CIA timeline that said she had been briefed on Sept. 4, 2002, that "enhanced interrogation techniques" - a euphemism for torture - "had been employed."

    Democrats quickly closed ranks behind the speaker. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, made clear whom she believes.

    "I've know Nancy a long time," Feinstein said. "We lived a few houses apart for a couple of decades. I've never known her not to be truthful. Let me put that on the record."

    Feinstein had this to say about the CIA, now headed by fellow Californian Leon Panetta of Monterey:

    "The CIA on this issue is in a defensive mode. Who knows whether what they're saying is right or wrong? The CIA is not an agency that is above not telling the truth."

    Republicans contend that Pelosi had known all along that that top al Qaeda suspects were being harshly interrogated for information on future plots, but only called it torture after the interrogations became public and inflamed her liberal base. They say it is unfair to investigate former Bush officials if Pelosi was also complicit.

    Pelosi waited for her regular weekly news conference to address the issue, after a trip to Iraq had left unanswered for nearly a week media reports fueled primarily by GOP sources making accusations.

    "Yes, I am saying that they are misleading - that the CIA was misleading the Congress," Pelosi said. She said she would "be very happy" if the CIA would release the notes from the 2002 briefing so that everyone could see for themselves. She repeated her call for a truth commission to air the facts.

    Rare political damage
    There is little doubt that Pelosi has sustained rare political damage, with even liberal late-night comedian Jon Stewart joking about her claim that Bush officials told her they had legal grounds to use torture but had not actually used it. The uproar has arrived at a delicate juncture when Pelosi faces a daunting challenge enacting President Obama's first-year agenda, including health care reform.

    Yet those who think Pelosi is in any danger of being driven from power, in the manner of such past speakers as Newt Gingrich or Jim Wright, underestimate her strength, steadily cultivated over 22 years in Congress since arriving as a San Francisco backbencher in 1987. Pelosi's hallmark achievement has been to unify Democrats, not just her Bay Area allies but conservative Southern and rural Democrats. There is no sign that they will abandon her now.

    Rep. George Miller, D-Martinez, a top Pelosi confidant, said it was "ludicrous" to think Pelosi is in any political danger. "Obviously, it's an attempt by the architects and promoters of torture to try somehow to shift the blame to Democrats when for six, seven years, this is what they did," Miller said. "She's made her statement, and she made her record very clear."

    Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, said he was "a little shocked" when asked three days ago whether Pelosi was in trouble. So Thursday, as the Pelosi news conference was blaring on every cable TV network, he said, "I've been asking around on the (House) floor, and people just look at me like I'm nuts."

    If anything, Pelosi's no-prisoners stance may build support for the truth commission she has advocated to determine how decisions about the wars in Iraq and on terror were made. Her call for such a commission last month touched off the storm that has now engulfed her.

    Pelosi accused the Bush administration of "misinforming" Congress not only about torture but about weapons of mass destruction as a way of pushing its war agenda with minimal interference from Congress.

    "Let's get it straight," she said. "The Bush administration has conceived a policy. The CIA comes to the Congress, withholds information about the timing and the use of (torture). We later find out that it had been taking place before they even briefed us about the legal opinions and told us that they were not being used."


    GOP leader's perspective
    Republican House leader John Boehner of Ohio said Pelosi's responses "continue to raise more questions than provide answers." He said it is "hard for me to imagine that anyone in our intelligence area would ever mislead a member of Congress."

    Marc Sandalow, former Washington bureau chief for The Chronicle who covered Pelosi for 20 years and wrote her biography, "Madame Speaker," in 2008, said that what is clear is that "somebody's not telling the truth, either Nancy Pelosi or somebody at the CIA. And there is nothing in Nancy Pelosi's long public history to suggest that she lies. Hardball politics, yes. Lying, no."

    Pelosi is also a notorious stickler for protocol. It comes as little surprise that she would leave it to her successor on the House Intelligence Committee, Rep. Jane Harman, D-Venice (Los Angeles County), to send a letter to the White House objecting to the techniques after a later and apparently more complete briefing on Feb. 5, 2003, which Pelosi's national security aide attended.

    Feinstein has opened what she expects to be a six- to eight-month Senate Intelligence Committee investigation of the interrogations. She opposes a truth commission because her committee can look at secret documents and take less time. With a commission, she said, "I don't think you'll really get a professional job. I think you'll get a very controversial work product. Now, our work product may be controversial, but it will be sound."

    Echoing the concerns of many members on the House and Senate intelligence committees, she said her own experience with CIA briefings is that they tend to be "very bland, very theoretical and with very little said. You cannot take notes. ... There is no opportunity for a lot of questions."

    Push to expand briefings
    Feinstein and others are pushing legislation to expand such briefings to the full intelligence committees, including professional staff. Some experts concur that limiting briefings to as few as four members of Congress who are sworn to absolute secrecy obstructs Congress' obligation to oversee the executive branch.

    The controversy puts Panetta in a difficult spot, defending the CIA against a fellow Californian. In a letter accompanying the timeline that implicates Pelosi, Panetta said the information is based on the best recollections of the CIA briefers at the time and may not be accurate.

    E-mail Carolyn Lochhead at [email protected].

    This article appeared on page A - 1 of the San Francisco Chronicle


    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    She realy thinks the american public is stupid.

    I guess a lot of them are. Look what we have for President.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  5. Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    She realy thinks the american public is stupid.

    I guess a lot of them are. Look what we have for President.
    Remember she was also voted in

  6. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Exclamation She was voted in but not to her current position.

    Quote Originally Posted by rockwerks View Post
    Remember she was also voted in
    The sheeple put her in congress. The other congressmen made her the speaker of the house. She is living proof of the saying "if you give a fool enough rope..."

    She is well on the way to political suicide with her recent bunch of lies, untruths and misgivings.

    It will be the Democrats that destroy her as they will all be eyeing her bully pulpit for themselves.

    I hope they have a good time doing it! They will only reveal their true characters as they do.

    I say let's get a bucket of popcorn and a coke and watch the fun. It will open things up for another conservative to step up to the plate.

    Rockwerks...Why don't you run for office...you'd fit right in with the rest of them
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

  7. #16
    wolfhunter Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by festus View Post
    The sheeple put her in congress. The other congressmen made her the speaker of the house. She is living proof of the saying "if you give a fool enough rope..."

    She is well on the way to political suicide with her recent bunch of lies, untruths and misgivings.

    It will be the Democrats that destroy her as they will all be eyeing her bully pulpit for themselves.

    I hope they have a good time doing it! They will only reveal their true characters as they do.

    I say let's get a bucket of popcorn and a coke and watch the fun. It will open things up for another conservative to step up to the plate.

    Rockwerks...Why don't you run for office...you'd fit right in with the rest of them
    Now, Festus. I know he's voiced a lot of tripe lately, but have you caught him in a lie yet? In my book, that makes him one better than the elected Dems.

  8. Quote Originally Posted by wolfhunter View Post
    Now, Festus. I know he's voiced a lot of tripe lately, but have you caught him in a lie yet? In my book, that makes him one better than the elected Dems.
    Hey Thanks.............eeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr....... .I think?

  9. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Talking At least you own guns!!!

    Quote Originally Posted by rockwerks View Post
    Hey Thanks.............eeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrr....... .I think?
    Just because I don't see eye to eye with you just means that we are human. You would obviously do a better job than Pelosi
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

  10. #19
    wolfhunter Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by festus View Post
    Just because I don't see eye to eye with you just means that we are human. You would obviously do a better job than Pelosi
    Ditto. I may not always agree with you but at least I can see where you're coming from most of the time. NP can't tell the same story 4 times in a row.

  11. #20
    As suggested on a radio show (I don't remember which one) I was listening to the other day, I think we oughtta waterboard Pelosi.
    The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. - Thomas Jefferson

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast