No Fly - No Buy - Page 3
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: No Fly - No Buy

  1. [quote=ronwill;78180]Take a look:



    Dianne Feinstein Will Pick the Time and Place to Grab Your Guns // Current

    We all know Feinestein is a total tool and will never learn, she is dense as a board

    Obama response: "I continue to believe that we can respect and honor the Second Amendment right in our Constitution -- the rights of sportsmen and hunters and homeowners that want to keep their families safe -- to lawfully bear arms, while dealing with assault weapons that, as we know here in Mexico, are used to fuel violence," Obama said.

    Full version "I have not backed off at all from my belief that the assault weapons ban makes sense," Obama said, adding that he is not "under any illusions that reinstating that ban would be easy."

    Instead, the president said his administration is focused on enforcing laws that are already on the books, like targeting guns that are illegally smuggled over the border that are "helping to fuel extraordinary violence" as the drug trade soars.

    "That's something we can stop," Obama said.

    everything you posted except for Feinstein give me more hope than I had in 2008 that we will have less issue than expected

    I believe that Obama has seen the writing on the wall. He knows if his administration attacks the 2nd he wont get reelected. I am hoping that we have a decent republican candidate in 2012 to put up a decent effort. I know and like McCain but he's is not what we need.

  2.   
  3. #22
    Barack Obama has Nominated a ANTI-GUN RIGHTS Judge for the Supreme Court:
    Obama's Supreme Court Nominee OPPOSES Gun Rights!

    http://www.usacarry.com/forums/2nd-a...t-justice.html

  4. Quote Originally Posted by Bohemian View Post
    Barack Obama has Nominated a ANTI-GUN RIGHTS Judge for the Supreme Court:
    Obama's Supreme Court Nominee OPPOSES Gun Rights!

    http://www.usacarry.com/forums/2nd-a...t-justice.html
    This nominee is no friend for us, but neither was the dork she was replacing, it will not change the makeup of the Supreme court at all.

    What will be funny is if she does get the NOD, she may have to opt out on opinions of her court that is pending appeal to the High court. It may actually be an advantage over another judge is a few instances. (very few)

  5. #24
    wolfhunter Guest
    This nominee may affect the balance of Scotus on 1A or "Civil Rights" issues, but she won't change the balance on 2A issues.

  6. Quote Originally Posted by wolfhunter View Post
    This nominee may affect the balance of Scotus on 1A or "Civil Rights" issues, but she won't change the balance on 2A issues.
    True. What shocks me is the fact that She does not see the constitution pertaining to all.

  7. #26
    This pick is to the left of the Justice she was nominated to replace...

    Again, it is being overlooked that Souter was not one of the 2-3 justices to be potentially replaced during the current and the next Presidential terms, whomever is in office...

    The balance of power in the SCOTUS could most certainly be tipped to the left over the next 4-8 years...

    Souter is actually much better then Sotomayor even though they hold similar opinions on the 2nd Amendment...

    Obama would be hard pressed to find a sitting minority judge that was more to the left then Sotomayor...
    AND another Socialist Adgena Supporter...



    "I am not the champion of lost causes, but the champion of causes not yet won." - Norman Thomas, six-time presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast