The Usurper Obama Nominates His First Anti-Second Amendment Justice - Page 2
Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 32

Thread: The Usurper Obama Nominates His First Anti-Second Amendment Justice

  1. #11
    I don't know why some are surprised at this nomination. Most of us knew what would happen and that it's basically an even trade. We really need to hope one of the conservative judges don't retire for whatever reason.

  2.   
  3. #12
    Exactly. No surprise and we have at least 4 years and perhaps 8 of the Obamanation. He will be able to do a lot of damage in that amount of time. I shudder to think where this country is heading.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  4. #13
    Quote Originally Posted by HK4U View Post
    Exactly. No surprise and we have at least 4 years and perhaps 8 of the Obamanation. He will be able to do a lot of damage in that amount of time. I shudder to think where this country is heading.
    Black Tuesday January 20th, 2009, the Beginning of an ERROR...


  5. #14
    RINO Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) in an interview with CNN, shows his support for Anti-Constitution Judge Sotomayor...

    Hatch: Sotomayor 'highly likely' to be confirmed, barring surprises - CNN.com

    We need to write Senator Hatch and RNC Chairman Michael Steele and let them know RINO's will no longer be tolerated! PERIOD!
    Email Sen. Orrin Hatch

    Judge Sotomayor clearly does not support the Constitution as it was written and our founding fathers intended...

    Contact RNC Chairman Michael Steele:
    Republican ? National ? Committee

  6. #15
    Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court
    -- Time to start contacting your Senators right away

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org


    Friday, May 29, 2009


    Unless you've taken a very long Memorial Day vacation, you've no doubt
    heard the big news.

    President Obama has picked an anti-gun radical to replace Justice David
    Souter on the Supreme Court.

    Obama's pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S.
    Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an
    anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of
    law under the Constitution.

    The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
    Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms.
    Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power
    (as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into
    counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.

    Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled
    in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the
    states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet
    incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she
    believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.

    This is pure judicial arrogance -- something Sotomayor relishes (as long
    as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right
    to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the
    Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and
    terrorized in their neighborhoods.

    But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated
    by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar,
    she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental
    right."

    Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
    Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton
    University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
    and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
    firearms ownership.

    Sotomayor's Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically
    correct views on the law and the role of judges.

    In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly
    clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this
    did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis),
    Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: "I know this is on
    tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don't
    make law -- I know. Um, okay. I know, I'm not promoting it, I'm not
    advocating it." The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.

    But Sotomayor's joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets
    confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start
    contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against
    this dangerous nomination.

    ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the
    nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can
    go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
    http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
    pre-written e-mail message below.


    ----- Pre-written letter -----

    Dear Senator:

    If you cherish the Second Amendment and agree that it protects an
    individual right to keep and bear arms -- as stated by the recent Heller
    decision -- then you must vote against Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

    This choice for the Supreme Court is totally unacceptable! Consider a
    partial rendering of her anti-gun record:

    * Sotomayor ruled in United States v. Sanchez-Villar (2004) that "the
    right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right."

    * Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which
    ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to
    the states. This makes her more liberal than the Ninth Circuit, which
    stated in April that the Second Amendment does apply to the states.

    * Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
    Fox Cable News reported on May 28 that in her senior thesis at Princeton
    University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
    and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
    firearms ownership.

    I will consider a vote in favor of Sotomayor as the most anti-gun vote a
    Senator could cast. To send an anti-gun liberal judge to the Supreme
    Court for the rest of her life is to establish "legislation without
    representation." After all, she says that the courts are where policy
    is made, and once she's there, we'll never be able to vote her out.

    Again, please vote against this dangerous nomination.

    Sincerely,
    Your Second Amendment Supporting U.S. Born Citizen And Constituent (your name)

  7. #16
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dallas/Fort Worth
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohemian View Post
    Obama Picks Anti-gun Judge for the Supreme Court
    -- Time to start contacting your Senators right away

    Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
    8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
    Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
    http://www.gunowners.org


    Friday, May 29, 2009


    Unless you've taken a very long Memorial Day vacation, you've no doubt
    heard the big news.

    President Obama has picked an anti-gun radical to replace Justice David
    Souter on the Supreme Court.

    Obama's pick is Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who is currently on the U.S.
    Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an
    anti-Second Amendment record and has displayed contempt for the rule of
    law under the Constitution.

    The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the
    Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms.
    Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power
    (as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into
    counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.

    Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled
    in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the
    states. As she and her cohorts claimed, the Supreme Court has not yet
    incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she
    believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.

    This is pure judicial arrogance -- something Sotomayor relishes (as long
    as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right
    to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the
    Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and
    terrorized in their neighborhoods.

    But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated
    by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar,
    she stated that "the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental
    right."

    Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
    Fox Cable News reported yesterday that in her senior thesis at Princeton
    University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
    and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
    firearms ownership.

    Sotomayor's Second Amendment views go hand in hand with her politically
    correct views on the law and the role of judges.

    In a speech given at Duke University in 2005, she made it abundantly
    clear that judges are involved in making policy. Realizing that this
    did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis),
    Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: "I know this is on
    tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don't
    make law -- I know. Um, okay. I know, I'm not promoting it, I'm not
    advocating it." The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.

    But Sotomayor's joke will be on us and our liberties if she gets
    confirmed to the Supreme Court. And that is why we need to start
    contacting our Senators early and often, urging them to vote against
    this dangerous nomination.

    ACTION: Please contact your two Senators and urge them to oppose the
    nomination of Judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme Court. You can
    go to the Gun Owners Legislative Action Center at
    http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm to send your Senators the
    pre-written e-mail message below.


    ----- Pre-written letter -----

    Dear Senator:

    If you cherish the Second Amendment and agree that it protects an
    individual right to keep and bear arms -- as stated by the recent Heller
    decision -- then you must vote against Judge Sonia Sotomayor.

    This choice for the Supreme Court is totally unacceptable! Consider a
    partial rendering of her anti-gun record:

    * Sotomayor ruled in United States v. Sanchez-Villar (2004) that "the
    right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right."

    * Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which
    ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to
    the states. This makes her more liberal than the Ninth Circuit, which
    stated in April that the Second Amendment does apply to the states.

    * Sotomayor has held very anti-gun views, even as far back as the 1970s.
    Fox Cable News reported on May 28 that in her senior thesis at Princeton
    University, she wrote that America has a "deadly obsession" with guns
    and that the Second Amendment does not guarantee an individual right to
    firearms ownership.

    I will consider a vote in favor of Sotomayor as the most anti-gun vote a
    Senator could cast. To send an anti-gun liberal judge to the Supreme
    Court for the rest of her life is to establish "legislation without
    representation." After all, she says that the courts are where policy
    is made, and once she's there, we'll never be able to vote her out.

    Again, please vote against this dangerous nomination.

    Sincerely,
    Your Second Amendment Supporting U.S. Born Citizen And Constituent (your name)
    Just more fuel being added to the fire! They just don't get it! But, there's 545 of them...and millions of us and that needs no elaboration.
    An ARMED individual is a CITIZEN! ...An UNARMED individual is a SUBJECT!

  8. #17
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Dallas/Fort Worth
    Posts
    49
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohemian View Post
    RINO Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) in an interview with CNN, shows his support for Anti-Constitution Judge Sotomayor...

    Hatch: Sotomayor 'highly likely' to be confirmed, barring surprises - CNN.com

    We need to write Senator Hatch and RNC Chairman Michael Steele and let them know RINO's will no longer be tolerated! PERIOD!
    Email Sen. Orrin Hatch

    Judge Sotomayor clearly does not support the Constitution as it was written and our founding fathers intended...

    Contact RNC Chairman Michael Steele:
    Republican ? National ? Committee
    Orrin Hatch...another turncoat who needs to be remembered in 2010 elections. I say.....FIRE ALL OF THEM!!
    An ARMED individual is a CITIZEN! ...An UNARMED individual is a SUBJECT!

  9. #18
    Quote Originally Posted by Debray View Post
    I just received this from a friend in Texas that asked I pass it on, and it looks like we need all the help we can get.

    In case you were not aware...

    The NRA is giving FREE 1-yr memberships to everyone
    who wants to join.
    They are trying to build up their membership to fight pending
    legislation that impacts our right to keep and bear arms.

    It is very important that anti-gun congressmen see how many
    people they will have to fight to get their legislation through.

    https://www.nrahq.org/nrabonus/accept-membership.asp

    PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!!
    This can include spouses and children also.
    Is there a way to get to this free trial through the NRA website? I am already a member but I would like to pass this on to a couple friends. However I don't want to do so if I can't verify that it is legit. I couldn't find anything on the NRA site related to a free trial membership. I also tried "free trial" and "trial membership" in the search on the site and came up with no results.
    The two enemies of the people are criminals and government, so let us tie the second down with the chains of the Constitution so the second will not become the legalized version of the first. - Thomas Jefferson

  10. #19
    Obama Picks Sotomayor for Supreme Court
    by Larry Pratt

    The gloves are off and the mask has been put aside. All of the President’s previous dissimulation to the contrary, he aims to use the Supreme Court to finish off what is left of the Constitution.

    Judge Sonia Sotomayor is an Obama lieutenant in his assault against the Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

    We need to tell each Senator that this will be 1994 all over again. That is the year the Democrats lost control of the Congress when they voted for President Clinton’s gun ban.

    Sonia Sotomayor is currently on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second District. There she has racked up an anti-Second Amendment record. Generally she has displayed contempt for the rule of law under the Constitution.



    The Heller decision put the Supreme Court in support of the Constitutional protection of the individual right to keep and bear arms. Sotomayor, a politically correct lover of centralized government power (as long as she is part of the power elite), immediately went into counter-attack mode against the Heller decision.

    Sotomayor was part of a three-judge panel earlier this year which ruled in Maloney v. Cuomo that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. What? Well, as she and her cohorts claim, the Supreme Court has not yet incorporated the states under the Second Amendment. Until then, she believes, the Second only applies to the District of Columbia.

    This is pure judicial arrogance -- something Sotomayor relishes (as long as she is one of the ruling judges). In fact, protection of the right to keep and bear arms was a major objective for enactment of the Fourteenth Amendment, as recently freed slaves were being disarmed and terrorized in their neighborhoods.

    But Sotomayor disdains this important right of individuals, as indicated by an earlier opinion from 2004. In United States v. Sanchez-Villar, she stated that “the right to possess a gun is clearly not a fundamental right.”

    Sotomayor’s Second Amendment views flow naturally from her politically correct views on the law and the role of judges.

    Sotomayor thinks that her being a Latina with the appropriate genitalia qualifies her to rule better than “a White male who hasn’t lived that life.” This was the judge’s “learned” opinion delivered in a Cultural Diversity lecture at the University of California (Berkeley) School of Law in 2001. As a politically correct elitist, we can be sure that she will continue to rule against the Second Amendment.

    Sotomayor laid bare her raw grasping for power and lack of judicial temperament in a speech given at Duke University in 2005. She made it abundantly clear that she is not interested in applying the law and respecting the meaning of our founder’s words.

    “All of the legal funds out there, they’re looking for people with court of appeals experience because the court of appeals is where policy is made,” she told her Duke audience.

    Realizing that this did not sound very judicial (even though most judges act on this basis), Sotomayor tried to laugh off her brazen admission: “I know this is on tape and I should never say that, [audience laughing], because we don’t make law – I know. Um, okay. I know, I’m not promoting it, I’m not advocating it.” The audience continued to laugh. They got the joke.

    Sotomayor’s joke will be on us and our liberties.

    President Obama said he was looking for a judge based on their “empathy.” I have no doubt that is but a more considered rephrasing of Sotomayor’s genitalia philosophy of judging. Absent in all the chatter about Sotomayor is fidelity to the original meaning of the Constitution.

    Sotomayor’s judicial philosophy might be best characterized by the Queen of Hearts who proclaimed that “I can believe eight different things before breakfast” -- except, of course, for the true meaning of the “right to keep and bear arms.”

    By her own admission she wants her experience to rule from the bench, and thus, it is highly unlikely that her Ivy League, elitist factory background will lead to her “feeling good” about folks owning guns.



    http://gunowners.org/


  11. #20
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,675
    No surprise here, nor should there be any reason for alam among us pro 2A advocates. If a pro 2A judge such as Thomas, Scalia, Roberts, or Alito were being replaced by an anti, then we should be concerned. However, since one anti is being replaced by another, the balance of the court has not been changed.
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast