Abc turns programming over to obama; news to be anchored from inside white house - Page 3
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 30 of 30

Thread: Abc turns programming over to obama; news to be anchored from inside white house

  1. #21
    Quote Originally Posted by jwtollett21 View Post
    The fact is it is broke. What about all the people who can't buy health insurance because they are not healthy enough. But they don't qualify for medicade. Ask your health insurance company if they care. They don't thats why it is broke and why we got to have a plan for all.

    As far as Obama goes on the national debt. lets argue about that in 7 years. All we have now is how much of a debt Bush left us.
    Let us know when you start talking rationally...

    Get off the Crack and Kool-Aid the Messiah is feeding you...

    The Argument is over, The Usurper left Bush spending in the dust, about two hours after he took office; the Usurper Obama spent more money in his first 30 days in office then all other administrations did combined, in the entire history of the country, inflation adjusted...

    NUFF SAID...

    Show us where in the Constitution it entitles any body to free Health Care, Free Education or any other free stuff on your neighbors dollar...

    Or where is says the Government can charge every household in the country a 200+ a month stinking Green Tax...

    Or where it says the Government can run privately held corporations...

    OBAMA
    One Big Ass Mistake America...

  2.   
  3. #22
    Quote Originally Posted by jwtollett21 View Post
    First of all thank you for a nice reply and for not getting all bent about this. I enjoy talking rationally about things. SOme of the other people should take your resonse as an example. Anyways,

    For one you cut the wasteful spending to stuff thats so not important. And that goes for both sides dem & rep. Ask your insurance company if they would cover you if you had a heart attack or cancer. Unless you have group insurance the answer is no. Thats why we got to have something. THis is america ya'll we pick up our soldier's in the battlefield even if it means risking our life. We got to help the unisured/uninsurable.

    We have some of the best drs in the world because we have the best opportunity in education and are the most technologicallly advanced. Not because they want to pay more. We got to reach out to the uninsured and these small business owners who pay out the wazoooo for health insurance. You cann't have a health system that wants to profit. That doesn't make since to me.
    There are state run and charity hospitals that care for those who don't have the means to pay. It is also against the law to refuse ANYONE emergency care based on capability to pay. The problem with cuts is that education is usually hard hit during these and it's already been cut to the bone. Another area for cuts would be defense. With current worldwide events do you really want to cut that? Who do you think is going to pay the trillion (yes trillion) dollars for the proposed health care program? And that's just to get it started. Then there's the abuse of the system. Even now go sit in an emergency room and see how many are there with sniffles and get upset when a trauma patient is taken ahead of them.

  4. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by ronwill View Post
    There are state run and charity hospitals that care for those who don't have the means to pay. It is also against the law to refuse ANYONE emergency care based on capability to pay. The problem with cuts is that education is usually hard hit during these and it's already been cut to the bone. Another area for cuts would be defense. With current worldwide events do you really want to cut that? Who do you think is going to pay the trillion (yes trillion) dollars for the proposed health care program? And that's just to get it started. Then there's the abuse of the system. Even now go sit in an emergency room and see how many are there with sniffles and get upset when a trauma patient is taken ahead of them.
    Its also against the Constitution to have mandated emergency care or any other kind of mandate at the expense of others...

    Its those very unconstitutional mandates that are largely responsible for our high cost of health care, with in excess of 12 million illegal aliens using the emergency room for their primary health care facility...

    Sanctuary State California is giving IOU's for income tax refunds because they are bankrupt from the billions they are spending on free health care and welfare for illegal aliens...

    Massachusetts is bankrupt from their Mandated Universal Health Care System...

    Like every other Socialist and Communist idea of the Usurper Obama's and jwtollett21's, its failed everywhere else in the world its been tried in history...

    Its flat out unsustainable...

    Its time for a New Declaration of Independence...

    Where once again, the people decide their own fate and how they spend their own money...


  5. #24
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohemian View Post
    Its also against the Constitution to have mandated emergency care or any other kind of mandate at the expense of others...

    Its those very unconstitutional mandates that are largely responsible for our high cost of health care, with in excess of 12 million illegal aliens using the emergency room for their primary health care facility...

    Sanctuary State California is giving IOU's for income tax refunds because they are bankrupt from the billions they are spending on free health care and welfare for illegal aliens...

    Massachusetts is bankrupt from their Mandated Universal Health Care System...

    Like every other Socialist and Communist idea of the Usurper Obama's and jwtollett21's, its failed everywhere else in the world its been tried in history...

    Its flat out unsustainable...

    Its time for a New Declaration of Independence...

    Where once again, the people decide their own fate and how they spend their own money...

    Bohemian while we disagree on one particular subject we agree that universal health care is a very bad idea. One question though, where in the Constitution is it that bans mandated emergency care?

  6. #25
    Quote Originally Posted by jwtollett21 View Post
    Comp shooter24

    You should chill out. Just give an argument without the verbal nonsense and without derogatory comments

    thanks
    No, I will not chill out when all I see is an overbearing and over reaching gov't stealing my future wealth and prosperity away from me. You need to wake up and quit buying the government's lies.

  7. #26
    Quote Originally Posted by ronwill View Post
    Bohemian while we disagree on one particular subject we agree that universal health care is a very bad idea. One question though, where in the Constitution is it that bans mandated emergency care?
    10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, Ratified December 15th, 1791...
    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    The Unconstitutional Federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (42 U.S.C. 1395dd, EMTALA)
    is a United States Act of Congress passed in 1986 as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. It requires hospitals and ambulance services to provide care to anyone needing emergency treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay. There are no reimbursement provisions. (in others words we get a unspecified open ended bill) As a result of the act, patients needing emergency treatment can be discharged only under their own informed consent or when their condition requires transfer to a hospital better equipped to administer the treatment.

  8. #27
    Quote Originally Posted by Bohemian View Post
    10th Amendment of the United States Constitution, Ratified December 15th, 1791...
    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

    The Unconstitutional Federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (42 U.S.C. 1395dd, EMTALA)
    is a United States Act of Congress passed in 1986 as part of the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. It requires hospitals and ambulance services to provide care to anyone needing emergency treatment regardless of citizenship, legal status or ability to pay. There are no reimbursement provisions. (in others words we get a unspecified open ended bill) As a result of the act, patients needing emergency treatment can be discharged only under their own informed consent or when their condition requires transfer to a hospital better equipped to administer the treatment.
    I'm well versed on the states rights issue, however, this law mandating care is only for those facilities accepting payments from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. I agree that the federal government needs to stay out of the universal health care proposal and leave it to the states. When you start accepting money from the government though you grant them some control.

  9. #28
    Gee....somebody mentions anything Anti-Obama and out of the woodwork comes JW Tollet. Get a clue dude...socialism sucks....literally and figuratively!

  10. #29
    Sometimes being in Southeast Michigan does have a little blessing from time to time. We have good access to the Canadian News on CBC. On any given night you can listen to a report on how bad the Canadian Health Care system is failing. There are many Canadians that travel thru Detroit from Windsor or Port Huron from Sarnia to see an American Doctor. I have a cousin in Harrow, Ontario. He never stops complaining... Their taxes are very close to 50% of his income. Is that what you want for us here? This BMHO propsal is poor at best. It will lead to abuse and exorbitant fees. Let alone what it will cost us and our grandkids in taxes.
    Semper Fi

  11. #30
    Quote Originally Posted by ronwill View Post
    I'm well versed on the states rights issue, however, this law mandating care is only for those facilities accepting payments from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. I agree that the federal government needs to stay out of the universal health care proposal and leave it to the states. When you start accepting money from the government though you grant them some control.
    Unless you can show me something to the contrary; as I see it... what I posted applies to anybody who walks into a emergency room or facility that provides health care...

    Coincidentally; "Department of Health and Human Services" and Medicare are also unconstitutional socialist entitlement programs; that you would be challenged to find a single major hospital not deeply embedded with...

    Even in recent history we find that the Supreme Court ruled...
    Congress cannot directly compel states to enforce federal regulations. In 1997, the Court again ruled that the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act violated the Tenth Amendment (Printz v. United States, 521 U.S. 898 (1997)). The act required state and local law enforcement officials to conduct background checks on persons attempting to purchase handguns. Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, applied New York v. United States to show that the law violated the Tenth Amendment. Since the act “forced participation of the State’s executive in the actual administration of a federal program,” it was unconstitutional...

    Anybody who thinks that they can spend your money better then you can or that it is ok take money from somebody who worked for it and give it to somebody who did not, whether it is disguised as free health care, emergency or other wise, welfare, loans for things you could not otherwise qualify for (such as houses, that Barney Frank is trying to roll the dice again on), free education, etc... clearly does not have a fundamental understanding of the Constitution as it was written and intended by the founding fathers; and is no better then the sheeple that voted for and continue to support the Usurper Obama...




Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast