Barack Hussein Obama's "Civilian Army"
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13

Thread: Barack Hussein Obama's "Civilian Army"

  1. Barack Hussein Obama's "Civilian Army"

    This is scary as hell. Think about this, my friends. The U.S. military is huge as it is, and so is the combined might of the National Guard. Why would BHO feel he needs another army? Hmmm... let's see, much of the US military is already deployed overseas. Well then, what about the National Guard? Oh, that's right, National Guard troops are under STATE control, NOT Federal control.

    Add to this the possibly hundreds of empty internment camps around the country, and it smells like the government knows something we don't.

    Emanuel said that you never want to let a crisis go to waste. What crisis is coming?

    TFO



    Barack Obama's Civilian Army
    Thursday, August 27, 2009
    By Glenn Beck




    Thursday's show, I believe, it's the most controversial of all the shows this week — and maybe ever.

    I will give you some facts, some history but also some of the future.

    The reason Thursday's show is the last before Friday's solution, I wanted you to see who was advising the president and what they are doing, before I could ask you to look at this phrase from Barack Obama and think he meant it literally:

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    THEN-PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA: We cannot continue to rely on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    I don't know how anyone will respond to the facts I am going to present, because they really haven't responded to any of our questions or challenged any of the facts in our last few shows other than "Hey, don't call him a 'czar!'"

    But I can't make this piece of the puzzle fit, unless this piece is about building some kind of thug-ocracy.

    All week we've been asking tough questions — here's one more, Mr. President: Why do we need a civilian national security force that is "just as strong, just as powerful" as the military?

    Here's why I ask this question: Who are we fighting? Who internally is threatening our security?

    It's clearly not because we feel there is a threat from illegal aliens crossing the border, because anyone who would say that has been deemed a racist. A civilian national security force on the border is called The Minuteman and the attitude from this administration — as well as the Bush administration — is that they were "vigilantes." So it's not for the border.

    It can't be a civilian national security force against Islamic extremists, because according to this administration we aren't even at war against Islamic extremists anymore. Is this administration really going to ask the American people to profile and call-in tips on Muslim Americans who act suspiciously?

    Column ArchiveBarack Obama's Civilian Army
    Speak Without Fear
    All the President's Men
    Reasonable Questions for an Unreasonable Time
    Death of Small Business in America
    Full-page The One Thing Archive

    Show InfoAirs Weekdays at 5 p.m. ET
    Glenn Beck's bio
    The One Thing archive
    Glenn Beck's interview archive
    E-mail the show: [email protected]
    So, who's left? Is it possible we are seeing the beginnings of another enemy?

    Mr. President, is your civilian national security force to protect us from things the Missouri State Police, your own Homeland Security and the liberal Southern Law Poverty Center have come out and said were a threat: militia groups; tea party goers; folks with "Don't Tread on Me" flags; me; Sarah Palin?

    Think about this: Is it unreasonable to think this government would ask you to spy on your neighbors, in light of these recent stories:

    — Flag.gov e-mail asking for tips on "fishy" behavior

    — Cookies on your computer that track whenever you've been on a government Web site — this used to be illegal but that was changed

    — The government is using outside companies to track and contact you. Are they gathering information on you? I know that on "cash for clunkers" they didn't trust the dealers.

    • Is Beck right? Click here to sound off

    To me, all of this sounds like a sci-fi movie, but again I have to ask the reasonable question, in these unreasonable times: Who will the civilian national security force protect us from?

    Maybe a better question to ask is, Mr. President: Do you know of a coming event?

    Or maybe we should ask Joe Biden, who said:

    (BEGIN AUDIO CLIP)

    THEN-VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE JOE BIDEN: Mark my words, it will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy. The world is looking. We're about to elect a brilliant 47-year-old senator president of the United States of America.... Remember I said it standing here, if you don't remember anything else I said: Watch, we're gonna have an international crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.

    (END AUDIO CLIP)

    Is this civilian national security force just preparing for what Joe Biden predicted?

    Who builds an army against an unidentified, unrecognized threat? Because we can't answer that question — or any of the others just proposed — then it's up to us to look for clues.

    Maybe we have to start with the company whose CEO is a close financial adviser to the president of the United States, who helped write the health care bill and cap-and-trade bill and who has billions of dollars at stake: Jeffrey Immelt.

    Immelt has been appointed by president to the board of directors to the New York Federal Reserve. Does he have any information? Let's look for what they may be saying the threat will be that we will need a civilian national security force against.

    It would seem to me the network that sells "Yes We Did" dolls, mugs and t-shirts and is obviously extraordinarily close to the president in seven different ways — is it possible to watch their network and their news, to see if they have any inside information as to what this threat may be? Immelt's network seems to be the leading network in predicting a lot of trouble, but they're not alone:

    (BEGIN VIDEO MONTAGE)

    ED SCHULTZ RADIO SHOW: Folks, these people are psycho. That's what they are. Sometimes I think they want Obama to get shot. I do. I really think that there are conservative broadcasters in this country who would love to see Obama taken out.

    FRANK RICH, NEW YORK TIMES COLUMNIST: I'm just old enough, I was a kid, I remember I woke up in 1963 to the horrible events in Dallas. Even as a kid, I happened to be growing up in Washington, D.C., it was palatable to me all this hate talk about Kennedy and this sort of crazy fear.... But there were a lot of threats. There was a lot of stuff going on that in tone resembles this.

    SEN. BARBARA BOXER, D-CALIF.: All of this is a diversion by the people who want to, frankly, hurt President Obama. And by the way I saw some of the clips of people storming these townhall meetings. The last time I saw well-dressed people doing this, was when Al Gore asked me to go down to Florida when they were recounting the ballots, and I was confronted with the same type of people. They were there screaming and yelling, "Go back to California! Get out of here!" and all the rest of it.

    CONTESSA BREWER, MSNBC: "A man at a pro-health care reform rally just outside, wore a semiautomatic assault rifle on his shoulder and a pistol on his hip.... The Associated Press reports about a dozen people in all at that event were visible carrying firearms.... There are questions about whether this has racial overtones. I mean, here you have a man of color in the presidency and white people showing up with guns strapped to their waists.

    (END VIDEO MONTAGE)

    Is it reasonable to ask the question — based on these clips — do they think that a good portion of the American people are the enemy? They are such a danger we need a civilian national security force as well-funded and well-trained as the military?

    That's who they think the enemy is and, once again, the media has it completely wrong.

    So who is the real enemy?

    "Common Sense" has been No. 1 for the last 10 weeks. One of the last chapters is "The Enemy Within" — I wrote it months ago. It doesn't take a genius to figure this out — let me give you this quote:

    "It's not just the political class who has mastered the art of deception. There are other potentially deadly masters who will seek to exploit your frustration and sense of desperation. Many will warn you of government tyranny; they'll talk of secret societies, vast conspiracies, shadow governments, and the need for violent action. I urge you to stay away from these individuals and those ideas."

    We've showed you the radicals in this administration. Now I'll show you the radicals outside the administration who are being used and will be used by the media and by this administration:

    There was the Obama Joker poster creator; the right tried to take advantage of this and added the word "socialist" under it. But the creator of the poster is a Kucinich supporter who doesn't like Obama because he's not left enough.

    Then there was that clip on MSNBC: The racist white person (according to MSNBC) who brought a rifle to the Obama town hall — wasn't even white! He was black.

    In Denver, Maurice Joseph Schwenkler and an at-large accomplish smashed in windows at the Democratic Party HQ in Denver. Both parties accused Schwenkler of supporting the other, but he's a "trans-gendered anarchist" who belongs to the radical anarchist protest group Denver Bash Back.

    While the radicals in the White House may not be connected to the radicals just mentioned, they are connected by the fact that they are radicals.

    Remember, Obama adviser "czar" Jones created STORM who believes: "Revolutionaries need to be militant in street actions. As leaders in the fight for liberation, we should be role models of fearlessness before the state and the oppressor."

    These are the sort of tactics some of Obama's "czars" know best.

    So when we've got a president creating a "civilian force" as strong as the military and an admitted far-left radical in the White House doing this:

    (BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

    VAN JONES, GREEN JOBS 'CZAR': Actually, my job is not so dissimilar than my job was before.... What I do, can I make it simple, I'm basically a community organizer with the federal family.

    (END VIDEO CLIP)

    How else am I supposed to read this? I'm happy to hear any other explanation than "don't call him a czar."

    — Watch "Glenn Beck" weekdays at 5 p.m. ET on FOX News Channel

  2.   
  3. #2
    Scary stuff, I will be watching the show today

  4. #3
    the reason he wants his own army is the military wont back him if he tries anything. I was in the army four years and when Obama came into office every guy in my platoon we all said that its a good thing we support and defend the constitution before the orders of the pres. and another thing i was talking to some marines, and i found out like more than half of them are from tx, They all were saying they would just go back to texas if something kicks off. ... to some it up i am guessing that at least half the military will break off if he becomes wholey anti constitutional.

  5. #4
    I wonder if they will wear brown shirts and do the goose step?
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    North Shore - Mass.
    Posts
    77
    I love Glenn Beck
    "The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms . . ."
    - SAMUEL ADAMS

  7. Quote Originally Posted by infntrysuicdekng View Post
    the reason he wants his own army is the military wont back him if he tries anything. I was in the army four years and when Obama came into office every guy in my platoon we all said that its a good thing we support and defend the constitution before the orders of the pres. and another thing i was talking to some marines, and i found out like more than half of them are from tx, They all were saying they would just go back to texas if something kicks off. ... to some it up i am guessing that at least half the military will break off if he becomes wholey anti constitutional.
    You make a great point, and I appreciate the unique perspective that you bring to the forum. Thank you!

    TFO

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indianapolis IN
    Posts
    3
    From the videos, I get the impression that the members of Fedayeen Obama are going be too stupid to be very effective.

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    4,675
    I saw a clip of these guys on the Glen Beck show. Actually the group I saw looks more like a bunch of fraternity members doing a step show than a paramilitary organization.

    YouTube - THE Q'S STEPPING AT CLARK ATLANTA

    YouTube - Q Psi Phi 1990

    If you've ever been to a Black fraternity party (or sorority for that matter) step shows like these and like what I saw on the Glen Beck show are commonplace. If that's what Obama's so-called civilian security force will be doing, then I don't think I have anything to be scared of.
    Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

    Benjamin Franklin

  10. #9
    I am sure what we are seeing is just the tip of the iceberg. Once he gets it set up and in place it will go from bad to worse.
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Florida Panhandle
    Posts
    3,098

    Exclamation Please remember your history

    The Hitler youth were sort of like the boyscouts in the beginning...but by the end of he war were being trained to fly suicide kamikaze type missions against allied forces, used to execute dissenters and a prime recruiting ground for the SS

    The Fadayeen were set up from the start to keep Sadam in power and were a prime recruiting source for the republican guard. Younger members were also brainwashed into thinking blowing themselves up is cool as long as you take a jew, american, or westerner with you to ensure you receive your virgins.

    Here are the things I have a problem with...

    1. mandatory service
    2. Paramilitary training
    3. No congressional oversight
    4. the whole damn thing being paid fore by you and me
    5. Snitching on neighbors (where I come from snitches get stitches)
    6. Who in the name of God do we need them for??? What threat??? Don't we already have a military? FBI? CIA? Natl Guard? Who are they gonna defend against...you? me? who?
    FESTUS
    IN OMNIA PARATUS

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast