New Yorkers say White House should 'butt out'
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: New Yorkers say White House should 'butt out'

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area
    Posts
    1,854

    New Yorkers say White House should 'butt out'

    Guess this wasn't the change they were looking for!

    CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time - Blogs from CNN.com
    Poll: New Yorkers say White House should 'butt out'

    WASHINGTON (CNN) New York voters want President Barack Obama to stay out of their state's politics, according to a new poll.

    More than six out of 10 New Yorkers questioned in a Marist College survey released Thursday said it's wrong for the White House to suggest that Gov. David Paterson not run next year for election to a full term. Just over a quarter said that the Obama administration is well within its rights to get involved.

    The poll suggested that even a majority of Democrats, 51 percent, believes that the White House is meddling in their state's affairs. More than three quarters of Republicans questioned and nearly two thirds of Independents agreed.

    The survey of New York voters was conducted Tuesday, a day after the White House refused to confirm or deny a report that President Barack Obama urged Paterson not to seek a full term in 2010.
    "When Government fears the people, it's liberty. When people fear the Government, it's tyranny."
    - Benjamin Franklin

  2.   
  3. #2
    But don't they know the Obamanation is god?
    By faith Noah,being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear,prepared an ark to the saving of his house;by the which he condemned the world,and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith Heb.11:7

  4. #3
    he has shown time and time again how he sticks his nose where it does not belong. how long are we the people going to put up with this crap?
    You can have my freedom as soon as I'm done with it!!!

  5. #4
    This state has enough problems. We don't need any help from Obama. Would a suggestion that an African American governor not seek re-election be "racist" if it came from any other source? How about discrimination against a visually handicapped person? I guess not, it's all about protecting a vision of "change".

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast