The Democrat Party - Page 80
Page 80 of 80 FirstFirst ... 3070787980
Results 791 to 797 of 797

Thread: The Democrat Party

  1. #791
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    Finally! The IG Michael Horowitz’s report, or should I say “attempted coverup,” has been released. Now AG Barr’s DoJ investigation can move forward beyond the delay and distraction of the Horowitz coverup. Time for criminals to be tried for their illegal activities in pursuit of a coup!

    Turn John Durham loose on the criminals on the DoJ and FBI!
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  2.   
  3. #792
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    The Horowitz report is exactly what I expected! It is 434 pages of excuses and a whitewash intended to protect crooked cops, lawyers, Democrats, and the Obama Administration. AG Barr and John Durham must not allow the Horowitz report to cover deep state criminal behavior in a coup attempt to undermine the U.S. Constitution and President Trump!

    Perp-walk all of them to prison!
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  4. #793
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    Joe Biden Is Purposely Loosing His Mind....It's His Only Defense Regarding His Conduct In Ukraine...Remember ; He Was Supposed To Weed Out Corruption There-Not Join In It. Biden Know's Far Too Much On Obama & Clinton Inc. He Must Discredit Himself Gracefully...Or He's A Dead Man Walking.
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  5. #794
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    AG Barr Blasts the FBI’s Russia Probe, Slams Investigators for ‘Gross Abuse’

    Attorney General Bill Barr weighed-in Tuesday on the recently released Inspector General’s report; saying the FBI practiced “gross abuse” that relied on “flimsy evidence” to surveil senior Trump associates during the 2016 election.

    “Attorney General Bill Bar is blasting the FBI’s conduct during the Russia investigation, saying investigators relied on ‘flimsy’ evidence in launching the probe and disputing key conclusions from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s report released Monday,” reports Fox News.

    “It’s hard to look at this stuff and not think that it was a gross abuse,” Barr said. “Where I disagree with Mike, I just think this was very flimsy.”

    “The normal thing to do in this situation,” Barr said, “is to go to the campaign, and here I don’t think there’s a legitimate explanation for why they didn’t.”

    Read More: https://hannity.com/media-room/barr-talk-ag-barr-blasts-the-fbis-russia-probe-slams-investigators-for-gross-abuse/

    My Thoughts:

    What you need to remember in Horowitz’s report is, he was curtailed as to who he could interview, but Durham isn’t restricted and you’ll see numerous indictments and recommendations for criminal actions against a whole lot of people from the FBI & DOJ, be it current and retired.

  6. #795
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    There is a specific reason and concern I have in writing this post that is timely and important in understanding the deceit of Democrats and ‘Deep State’ bureaucrats in our nation today to nullify the legal process of changing the understanding and effect of our U.S. Constitution and replace it with a Marxist-Socialist so-called “democratic” form of government.

    Article V, of the U.S. Constitution provides the only Constitutional and legitimate legal means of amending the U.S. Constitution. Properly amending the Constitution is, by design, a very difficult and lengthy process. Specifically, “The Congress, whenever two thirds of both Houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose Amendments to this Constitution, or, on the Application of the Legislatures two-thirds of the several States, shall call a Convention for proposing Amendments, which, in either Case, shall be valid to all Intents and Purposes, as Part of this Constitution , when ratified by the Legislatures of three fourths thereof, as the one or the other Mode of Ratification may be proposed by the Congress... .”

    Notice, at no point ever did the Founders allow our Constitution, the very basis of the nature and breadth of all delegated powers of the federal government, was to be established by either democratic majority, judicial interpretation, precedence, or changing social values or opinions.

    Why is this important? Remember this every day for the rest of your life. First, Communist dictatorships and oligarchs always adopt in the name of their nation that they are “Democratic” (not Constitutional) republics. Second, the platform of the U.S. Democrat Party since the presidency of Barack Obama has always enshrined the policy goals enumerated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels in their 1848 publication, ”The Communist Manifesto.” And third, that the Communist agenda of the present day Democrat Party is profoundly opposed to and inconsistent with the values, rights guarantees, and protections contained in the U.S. Constitution as it stands and is understood legally today.

    The Democrat Party, and the ‘Deep State’ bureaucracy, have understood in the past, and understand today, that it is a virtual impossibility in the short term to repeal the U.S. Constitution in favor of a simple democratic majority system of government in which rights, property, and life itself can be eliminated by nothing more than a literal appearance of a simple majority (like Communist and religious dictators regularly command at the point of a gun or by bribery since early in the Twentieth Century).

    Because of the reality that repeal of the Constitution is almost an impossibility with the Article V amendment majorities required in Congress and the several States required for passage, Democrats depend upon an amendment process where judges and accepted practices by governmental agencies and courts methodically erode the meaning of the original document and the rights, values, privileges and protections.

    Essential to the process of unconstitutional amendment of the Constitution is not just packing the Supreme Court with activist justices who amend the Constitution by judicial means not intended or acceptable to our Founders nor most Americans until well into the Twentieth Century known as “Judicial Activism.” Under Judicial Activism all of the safety mechanisms of requiring significant majorities in both Houses of Congress, Legislatures, and ratification by three fourths of the several States, under a Constitutionally authorized Court, in direct opposition to the intent of Article V, rights, values, meanings, and protections—even historic Amendments relied upon for life and liberty—can, and have been, altered or eliminated by a simple majority of five Justices of the Supreme Court!

    Additionally, a means of amending the Constitution that was never accepted or intended by our Founders, and generations of our forefathers, is delivered through the agency of slow erosion and judicial precedent that challenges historic rights, values, privileges, and protections where the Courts refuse to stand for the Constitution as written and legally amended.

    And this is what the Democrats are depending upon to effect a wholesale dismantling of the Constitution as written and legally amended in favor of a “democratic” system of government where they can pass laws that would never stand Constitutional muster in our day, but are no longer held to the U.S. Constitutional standard of today.

    Democrats do not believe in a Constitutional Republic. They will tolerate it where necessary in the meantime; and they will gladly use it where it suits their purposes in the present; but their ultimate goal is to repeal the Constitution outright if possible, but until that possibility materializes they will always act to strip the Constitution of its ability to impede their Communist goals of rule in the name of a simple democratic majority.

    We owe it to our children and grandchildren—our heirs—to safeguard and preserve our Constitution in form and force as it was preserved for us by generations of past American patriots. May our resolve and righteous courage and character not be found wanting.

    God bless President Trump and our Constitutional Republic!
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  7. #796
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    They keep repeating the same rhetoric!!!
    "Trump is endangering our national security!"
    Yet these bastards allowing thousands of illegals into our borders.
    "Trump in endangering our national security."
    Yet Obama permitted 800,000 ( almost 1 million ) Syrian Muslim refugees into our borders not considering the possibility of the very ISIS terrorist that they were purportedly fleeing from could be infiltrating them???
    They want open borders and no wall!
    Yet Trump is endangering our national security???
    What a bunch of quack hypocrites!!!
    We need to vote EVERY Demonrat out of office for the sake of our national security!!!
    The only easy day was yesterday
    Dedicated to my brother in law who died
    doing what he loved being a Navy SEAL

  8. #797
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Cobbs Creek, VA
    Posts
    16,088
    Biden blames staff, says nobody ‘warned’ him son’s Ukraine job could raise conflict

    Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed in a new interview that when his son Hunter was a board member of Ukrainian Energy Company Burisma Holdings while he was in office, no one informed him that it could pose a problem.

    Biden insisted again that Hunter did nothing wrong, but this time appeared to fault his staff for not cluing him in that there could be concerns about his son's involvement with the foreign company that had been under investigation while Biden was in office and dealing with Ukraine policy.

    "Nobody warned me about a potential conflict of interest. Nobody warned me about that," Biden told NPR in a story posted Monday.

    State Department official George Kent addressed this during his testimony as part of the impeachment inquiry of President Trump, acknowledging that he told staff members there was concern over the appearance of a conflict of interest, but that no one told the vice president because his older son Beau was suffering from what was ultimately a fatal battle with brain cancer.

    "They should have told me," Biden says now. Hunter's dealings and the elder Biden's role ousting a prosecutor looking into Burisma are being used by Trump and his supporters against the now-2020 presidential candidate, even as Trump's effort to press for an investigation into that conduct has spurred the impeachment inquiry.

    "The appearance looked bad and it gave folks like Rudy Giuliani an excuse to come up with a Trumpian kind of defense, while they were violating the Constitution," Biden said.

    Trump's impeachment inquiry has focused primarily on his request for Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate the Bidens, as well as Democratic activities during the 2016 election. Democrats have accused Trump of using a White House visit for Zelensky and the delay of military aid to Ukraine as leverage.

    Trump insists he did nothing wrong and that he never called for any quid pro quo with the investigations. His administration claims that Trump was simply concerned about corruption within the Ukrainian government, asserting that is part of why he delayed the aid. Trump has also hammered the Bidens for alleged impropriety, blasting the former vice president for pressuring Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating Burisma.

    In the past, Biden has bragged publicly about threatening to withhold money from Ukraine in order to force the prosecutor's termination, but he claims it was due to suspicions of corruption, not because of his son's role with Burisma.

    Former Secretary of State John Kerry, who recently endorsed Biden for president, also claimed following a Biden campaign event Sunday that he "had no knowledge" of Hunter's involvement with Burisma while he was secretary.

    This, despite Kerry's stepson Christopher Heinz reportedly notifying two of Kerry's aides after Hunter Biden became a Burisma board member. Heinz and Hunter Biden had been business partners, co-owning the private equity firm Rosemont Seneca. According to the Washington Examiner, an email from Heinz to Kerry's aides distanced Heinz from Burisma, saying "there was no investment by our firm in their company," and claiming ignorance as to why Hunter became involved in the Ukrainian firm.

    Read more: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/biden-blames-staff-says-nobody-warned-him-sons-ukraine-job-could-raise-conflict?fbclid=IwAR1zACe2e7SVkuv3B2svbcK1PXWqstHf znqqK7I95KY0KGj1aAIaA_u9DC0

    My Thoughts:

    Former Vice President Joe Biden claimed in a new interview that when his son Hunter was a board member of Ukrainian Energy Company Burisma Holdings while he was in office, no one informed him that it could pose a problem.

    That statement from Biden is complete BS.

    So why blackmail the Ukraine, tell them to fire a prosecutor, then brag and laugh about what happened in a room full of reporters? It’s on tape dude, you can’t walk it back.

Page 80 of 80 FirstFirst ... 3070787980

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast