SC now has CWP reciprocity with DE - Page 3
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 38

Thread: SC now has CWP reciprocity with DE

  1. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gray Court, SC
    Posts
    2,934
    Their AG is the determining factor for reciprocity. Regardless what their law says their AG has allowed states without an agreement to carry in DE including SC. He even states that the States listed to carry in DE doesn't recognize DE's permits. Delaware Department of Justice - Attorney Generals Office is DE's Reciprocity list and SC is on it. I'd have no problem carrying in DE. I'd just make a copy of their Reciprocity list and carry it with me while there.

    However, as of today Delaware does not recognize the concealed deadly weapon licenses or permits issued by states other than those listed below, and these states do not recognize Delaware's concealed deadly weapons licenses as valid.
    USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Benefactor
    To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787

  2.   
  3. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    North Augusta, SC
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by mrjam2jab View Post
    Did you call and speak with SLED?
    Yes, I did call, and have it in writing as well. As CWP instructors, it's our responsibility to be up-to-date on reciprocity so we can provide accurate information to our students. Unfortunately, SLED could make that easier by keeping their online resources current.

  4. #23
    Quote Originally Posted by ForceTech View Post
    Unfortunately, SLED could make that easier by keeping their online resources current.
    Welcome to South Carolina. SLED has better things to do, like cite restaurants for serving alcohol to adults between 18 and 20. Even though the adult who purchases the beverage is also willfully breaking the law by atempting to purchase the beverage in question, they don't get prosecuted.

  5. #24
    I contacted Handgunlaw.us in regards to his pages...I figured he already has contacts in all the right offices...

    His response:

    About 2 months ago DE AG posted that they had signed an agreement with SC. In the past DE has listed other states as having agreements that they didn't. After contacting them When DE did this I called SLED and ask them if there was an agreement. I was told that they did nave an agreement.



    This is what it states on the DE Reciprocity Page at Delaware Department of Justice - Attorney Generals Office
    Start....Delawareans who have a Delaware concealed deadly weapons permit will be able to possess a concealed deadly weapon while visiting or traveling through the states listed above, and also in Idaho, Indiana and Vermont. However, Delawareans who possess a concealed deadly weapon in another state will be subject to and are responsible for knowing and obeying all of the laws and regulations in the other state that apply to the carrying and possession of concealed or openly-carried deadly weapons....End

    When made aware of this thread I got an email asking me to respond.
    Before I did that i decided to call SLED Again. So I called SLED again (This AM) and talked to 2 different people. Both said they DID NOT have an agreement with DE.

    It was hard for me to keep from raising my voice. It was not the fault of the two people I talked to today but the person I talked to 2 months ago. I really believe that they don't know and that only one person knows and SLED doesn't give out email addresses and it is difficult to get info out of them. I won't put here how I feel about this issue right now. This is a family board. It is tough enough to stay within the law but when a State AG says they have a signed agreement and then the other says they don't how are we to stay within the law. DE and SC have been the biggest headaches I have had in the 15+ years I have been doing this.

    I just sent the changes to Steve for the DE and SC page that says SC WILL NOT HONOR a DE Permit/License. It is tough enough to keep up with changing things and you try to double check and still get incorrect information.

    I can not view this thread so if you want to respond to it or contact me email me at [email protected]

    Stay safe,
    Gary Slider
    Handgunlaw.us

  6. (I registered so I could post this.)

    The DE AG Reciprocity Page at
    Delaware Department of Justice - Attorney Generals Office
    Does say something about other states not honoring their permit/License. It states This:
    Start
    The Attorney General is in the process of securing agreements with the appropriate officials in certain other states which when completed, permit persons who have a concealed deadly weapon license or permit issued by one of those states to lawfully possess a concealed deadly weapon while visiting or traveling through Delaware. Similarly, Delawareans will be able to possess a concealed deadly weapon while visiting or traveling through those states. However, as of today Delaware does not recognize the concealed deadly weapon licenses or permits issued by states other than those listed below, and these states do not recognize Delaware's concealed deadly weapons licenses as valid..........End

    But they are talking about the states not listed and not those listed as not honoring their Permit/License.

    But below the list on the DE AG's Page it states this:

    Start
    Delawareans who have a Delaware concealed deadly weapons permit will be able to possess a concealed deadly weapon while visiting or traveling through the states listed above, and also in Idaho, Indiana and Vermont. However, Delawareans who possess a concealed deadly weapon in another state will be subject to and are responsible for knowing and obeying all of the laws and regulations in the other state that apply to the carrying and possession of concealed or openly-carried deadly weapons. Because of differences in the laws of the various states, it is possible that a person who is lawfully permitted to possess a deadly weapon pursuant to Delaware law may be prohibited from doing so in another state. Most other states require any person who is carrying a concealed deadly weapon pursuant to a license or permit to also be in possession of the license or permit. ....End

    But again I called SLED over 2 months ago to confirm and was told they did have an agreement. After being informed of this thread I called again and was told NO.

    SLED has been very slow in updating their site. I believe there is a good chance there is an agreement but at this time if SLED says no that is what most LEO's will go by. Many Reasons I say this. 1st SLED has taken up to 9 months in the past to post that they have signed an agreement. 2nd. There is one person in SLED who takes care of Agreements and He does it part time and was it is not a priority.

    I had to straighten out DE over a year ago when they listed VA as a state they had signed with and VA said NO. In our discussions they finally told me they jumped the gun and didn't have an agreement and removed VA and didn't post it with a true agreement for over 6 months.

    It is items like this that make people lose faith in their Government. Either DE or SC is wrong in one way or the other. Either an agreement exists or ir doesn't. Neither post their agreements on their website when they sign them like other states do.

    The one thing good about this thread is it made me go back and look again. Thank you. The one thing I dislike most of all is having info that is incorrect. Though I go the extra to make sure sometimes even that is not enough.
    ___________
    Gary Slider
    Co-Owner Handgunlaw.us

  7. (Edited) I apologize. I Tried posting and it didn't appear and I thought I lost it. Sorry for the extra post.

    After thinking about this issue. I have a few other thoughts.

    1st. SLED has given me wrong info in the past. There is only one person in charge of Reciprocity and they do it part time. The person who use to do it has moved on to another position and a new person is doing it. The previous person in this position didn't spend much time on it. In fact he told me it was low on his priority list and that he had more pressing matters to take care of.

    2nd. Like I said before DE has posted on its Reciprocity Website in the past that they had agreements when they didn't. They posted in teh past they had an agreement with Virginia and when I talked to them and told them VA was saying there was no agreement they told me they jumped the gun and removed Virginia from their list. It was over 6 months later that they finally signed and agreement and added Virginia back on their list.

    That is why when I saw it on the DE page I called SLED a few months ago. I wanted to make sure. I do know that SLED is very slow about updating their website. It took them 9 months to finally add a state that reported they had signed with them.

    I would say that an agreement is either in the works or has actually been signed. I say this because DE posted it and SLED is so slow about getting the word out and I believe slow getting the word to the people who need to know. This is because it is a very low priority for them. But with SLED not posting that on their official website most LEO's in SC would believe that SC does not honor a DE Permit/License. We will just have to wait and see but we shouldn't have to wait and see.

    Over the years I have to say that I have heard more complaints about SLED than any state and their Permit?license Division. Most of them were not very kind about SLED and almost all of them came from SC Residents. This episode reinforces all that I have heard about SLED.

    It all boils down to one thing. Either the DE AG is posting something that is untrue and opening the residents of DE to being arrested in SC or SC doesn't know what is going on. One of them is dead wrong. The problem is we don't know which one!
    ___________
    Gary Slider
    Co-Owner Handgunlaw.us

  8. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Gray Court, SC
    Posts
    2,934
    First welcome Gary! Thanks for chiming in on this. I know that DE has a law that says they must have a written agreement for reciprocity with a state but here is an example of an unwritten agreement between DE and AZ. Concealed Weapons Reciprocal and Recognition Agreements - Arizona Department of Public Safety

    I feel like you that SLED may have made an agreement with DE but as usual they are taking their time on releasing the info. I've seen changes in gun laws take months and months to be updated on SLED's website so something like this is par for the course! As it is now we don't have a legal reciprocity with DE but SC CWP holders have permission from DE's AG to carry in DE. I don't know how you keep up with all the states...
    USAF Retired, CATM, SC CWP, NH NR CWP, NRA Benefactor
    To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms, and be taught alike, especially when young, how to use them... -- Richard Henry Lee, 1787

  9. #28
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    North Augusta, SC
    Posts
    16
    Gary,
    Thank you for all of your research and efforts! I refer ALL of my students to your website as the best resource for traveling with firearms.

    As a CWP instructor, you can imagine how frustrating it is to try to keep students informed on the current law. For instance, several significant laws have changed over the past two years, including allowing CWP holders to have a gun in their vehicle on school grounds, but the "official" written test we are required to give our students doesn't reflect that change (or others).

    I realize that SLED has lost a significant amount of their budget and staff, so prioritizing is important; however, it's irresponsible of them not to properly educate their armed citizens and provide an accurate resource for travelers from reciprocal states.

    I guess until someone is arrested for unwittingly breaking the law and sues SLED for not publishing the current law as required by statute, it will continue to be a low priority.

    Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to the armed citizen.

  10. #29
    Sled claiming budget problems as why they can't fix their CWP section, updating the website and test is just a smoke screen. Do the numbers.... figure out how much money they (the state) is making off of permits, both new applications and renewals and they are actually making money on this and could easily afford to keep the system updated.
    I think the last time I did this...I figured out something like a million a year.

  11. #30

    Thumbs down Sled

    Quote Originally Posted by [email protected] View Post
    Sled claiming budget problems as why they can't fix their CWP section, updating the website and test is just a smoke screen. Do the numbers....
    Yeah, I am sure there are no computer geeks who work for SLED who could do the updates pretty quickly.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Gun in car w/ SC CWP
    By macy8 in forum South Carolina Discussion and Firearm News
    Replies: 93
    Last Post: 02-19-2013, 03:51 AM
  2. Fl CWP and SC CWP
    By Bob in forum South Carolina Discussion and Firearm News
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 01-11-2012, 04:16 PM
  3. SC CWP: 103 days and counting
    By Lee Enfield in forum South Carolina Discussion and Firearm News
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 03-23-2010, 07:48 PM
  4. I lost my SC CWP due too charges
    By foots402 in forum Concealed Carry Discussion
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: 11-29-2009, 07:36 AM
  5. H 3003 In House Judiciary Committee
    By Red Hat in forum South Carolina Discussion and Firearm News
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-30-2009, 03:43 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast