S.308 (restaurant carry) debate from 4/17/13 - Page 33
Page 33 of 60 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast
Results 321 to 330 of 596

Thread: S.308 (restaurant carry) debate from 4/17/13

  1. #321
    Quote Originally Posted by nca_mm View Post
    So now it's back to the House with something new?
    No. The Senate is still hearing proposed amendments.

  2.   
  3. #322
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    The first state to secede!!!!
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by John Canuck View Post
    No. The Senate is still hearing proposed amendments.
    So when they reconvene @ 11:00 this morning, they'll still be in discussion of the 308 amendments? Will that idiot Scott still have the floor?

  4. Quote Originally Posted by John Canuck View Post
    Language mostly. For one thing, the House bill created some confusion with regard to how active duty LEO and a retired LEO get a CWP. He's just trying to make it more consistent. Frankly I'd prefer that everyone got treated the same, but I'm not going to get too hung up on it.

    Edit: correction from military to LEO.
    LEO's don't have to get a CWP...that's federal law. HR218 makes them exempt from all state firearm carry laws. I'm a reserve deputy in the upstate and we have been told we can carry into restaurants that serve alcohol so long as we don't drink. They don't want us drinking period, carrying or not, unless we're in a different county.

  5. #324
    Quote Originally Posted by nca_mm View Post
    So when they reconvene @ 11:00 this morning, they'll still be in discussion of the 308 amendments? Will that idiot Scott still have the floor?
    Yes. They will be talking about amendments as long as there are amendments on the desk. Whoever has the floor has the floor until they relinquish it. In theory, he could run the clock out on this session if he were to find enough things to talk about.

  6. #325
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    The first state to secede!!!!
    Posts
    325
    I see the senate is now adjourned until next Tuesday. Anything get done?

  7. #326
    Quote Originally Posted by AndeyHall View Post
    LEO's don't have to get a CWP...that's federal law. HR218 makes them exempt from all state firearm carry laws. I'm a reserve deputy in the upstate and we have been told we can carry into restaurants that serve alcohol so long as we don't drink. They don't want us drinking period, carrying or not, unless we're in a different county.
    That may be the case. Regardless, the version of S-308 returned from the House makes provision for retired LEO's to meet the proof of training requirement, but not for active duty LEO's. They want to change that so it's consistent for both. As I said, I think they should be treated like everyone else, but it's not really priority one as far as I'm concerned.

    Don't like that example, here's another. The version of S-308 returned from the House limited a "valid photo ID" to a drivers license (for most people). The amendment offered attempts to fix that little faux pas.

  8. S.308 (restaurant carry) debate from 4/17/13

    Quote Originally Posted by John Canuck View Post
    That may be the case. Regardless, the version of S-308 returned from the House makes provision for retired LEO's to meet the proof of training requirement, but not for active duty LEO's. They want to change that so it's consistent for both. As I said, I think they should be treated like everyone else, but it's not really priority one as far as I'm concerned.

    Don't like that example, here's another. The version of S-308 returned from the House limited a "valid photo ID" to a drivers license (for most people). The amendment offered attempts to fix that little faux pas.
    I just read the whole thing at length and at the end I noticed that it says that with a CWP, it can be under the seat and any other passenger compartment, opened or closed. Am I reading this correctly?

    I also just got an email about the legislative updates and it says it was "returned to House with amendments". So I'm confused as to how this whole legislative process works. Does the House now just have to approve the senate's new amended version and that's that?

  9. #328
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    The first state to secede!!!!
    Posts
    325
    Quote Originally Posted by AndeyHall View Post
    I just read the whole thing at length and at the end I noticed that it says that with a CWP, it can be under the seat and any other passenger compartment, opened or closed. Am I reading this correctly?

    I also just got an email about the legislative updates and it says it was "returned to House with amendments". So I'm confused as to how this whole legislative process works. Does the House now just have to approve the senate's new amended version and that's that?
    I believe I'm correct in saying that if the House doesn't change it one bit, then votes to pass it, on to the governor's desk it goes.

    My question is.....what are the amendments?

  10. #329
    If you got the email on Tuesday, it was a clerks error and was corrected later.

  11. Quote Originally Posted by nca_mm View Post
    I believe I'm correct in saying that if the House doesn't change it one bit, then votes to pass it, on to the governor's desk it goes.

    My question is.....what are the amendments?
    http://www.scstatehouse.gov/sess120_.../bills/308.htm

    There's the bill. You can compare it with previous versions to see what changes have been made over time but I don't know if you can see what changes were made this last time.

Page 33 of 60 FirstFirst ... 23313233343543 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast