S.308 (restaurant carry) debate from 4/17/13 - Page 59
Page 59 of 60 FirstFirst ... 94957585960 LastLast
Results 581 to 590 of 596

Thread: S.308 (restaurant carry) debate from 4/17/13

  1. Wonder when SLED is gonna update their laws...

  2.   
  3. Quote Originally Posted by Safebustr View Post
    Enjoyed the benefits of S308 last Saturday when Brother in law and Cousin with wives dined at California Dreaming in N Myrtle Beach, sure did feel good to not have to disarm before dining. Also felt good to know that at our table of 6 their were 4 armed folks.
    amen my brother!!! what ya packin'?

  4. #583
    Quote Originally Posted by huntindogg 0701 View Post
    amen my brother!!! what ya packin'?
    I carry (most times ) a XDs 45, sometimes, a beretta Nano or an LCP when the clothes dictate. BIL carries a Ruger LC9, the other folks had a LCP and an unknown as she don't talk much about what she carries but I think it was a LCP.

  5. #584
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester State Forest, SC
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by AndeyHall View Post
    Wonder when SLED is gonna update their laws...
    Typically, SLED takes about 6 months give or take a little to update. You're much better of getting your current info here...

    South Carolina Legislature Mobile

    Yeah, I know it's not updated yet either, but they generally only take a couple weeks.
    "I believe we should achieve a national standard on gun control, and that standard should be none whatsoever."

  6. #585
    Who voted for Liberty and Freedom during S308? -> South Carolina Gun Blog - Guns Save Lives.

  7. #586
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Manchester State Forest, SC
    Posts
    373
    Quote Originally Posted by John Canuck View Post
    Who voted for Liberty and Freedom during S308? -> South Carolina Gun Blog - Guns Save Lives.
    Nobody. Not a single damn one of them. Some just voted for less infringement on our rights than others.
    "I believe we should achieve a national standard on gun control, and that standard should be none whatsoever."

  8. #587

  9. #588
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Bonneau & Goose Creek, SC
    Posts
    440
    what was s198 Massey Amendment that the Ayes were red?

  10. #589
    Quote Originally Posted by John Canuck View Post
    That is great! Thanks to whoever put that together. What I love about it, is it has all the versions.

    NOTE: There are some that were absent in the very last vote, that were "nays" during previous versions (although they might have voted "yea" for some a couple of the undesirable versions). Some abstains as well. High chance those same people were up for re-election this year. Don't give them a break! Hold them as accountable as the "nays!"
    You can have good intentions and not be right.

  11. #590
    Quote Originally Posted by melloyello View Post
    what was s198 Massey Amendment that the Ayes were red?
    Senator MASSEY proposed the following amendment (308R006.ASM):
    Amend the bill, as and if amended, by striking SECTION 1 and inserting:
    /
    SECTION 1. Section 16-23-465 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

    "Section 16-23-465. (A) In addition to the penalties provided for by Sections 16-11-330, 16-11-620, and 16-23-460, 23-31-220, and by Article 1, of Chapter 23, of Title 16, a person convicted of carrying a pistol or firearm into a business which sells alcoholic liquor, beer, or wine for consumption on the premises is guilty of a misdemeanor, and, upon conviction, must be fined not more than two three thousand dollars or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
    In addition to the penalties described above, a person who violates this section while carrying a concealable weapon pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23, must have his concealed weapon permit revoked for a period of five years.
    (B)(1) This section does not apply to a person carrying a concealable weapon pursuant to and in compliance with Article 4, Chapter 31, Title 23 between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and midnight; however, the person shall not consume alcoholic liquor, beer, or wine while carrying the concealable weapon on the business's premises and shall not enter and remain on any portion of the business's premises primarily devoted to the service and consumption of alcoholic liquor, beer, or wine. A person who violates this subitem may be charged with a violation of subsection (A).
    (2) A business owner or person in legal possession or control of a business may prohibit the carrying of concealable weapons into the business by posting a 'NO CONCEALABLE WEAPONS ALLOWED' sign in compliance with Section 23-31-235. A person who carries a concealable weapon into a business with a sign posted in compliance with Section 23-31-235 may be charged with a violation of subsection (A).
    (3) A business owner or person in legal possession or control of a business may request that a person carrying a concealable weapon leave the business's premises, or any portion of the premises, or request that a person carrying a concealable weapon remove the concealable weapon from the business's premises, or any portion of the premises. A person carrying a concealable weapon who refuses to leave a business's premises or portion of the premises when requested or refuses to remove the concealable weapon from a business's premises or portion of the premises when requested may be charged with a violation of subsection (A)." /

    Renumber sections to conform.
    Amend title to conform.
    .

Page 59 of 60 FirstFirst ... 94957585960 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Quantcast