Ann Coulter Article...


skipjack_1st

New member
I love this woman!!


LET'S ALL SURRENDER OUR WEAPONS -- YOU FIRST!
April 8, 2009


The rash of recent shooting incidents has led people who wouldn't know
an AK-47 from a paintball gun to issue demands for more restrictions on
guns. To be sure, it's hard to find any factor in these shootings that
could be responsible -- other than the gun.

So far, this year's public multiple shootings were committed by:

-- Richard Poplawski, 23, product of a broken family, expelled from high
school and dishonorably discharged from the Marines, who killed three
policemen in Pittsburgh.

-- Former crack addict Jiverly Wong, 41, who told co-workers "America
sucks" yet somehow was not offered a job as a speechwriter for Barack
Obama. Wong blockaded his victims in a civic center in Binghamton, N.Y.,
and shot as many people as he could, before killing himself.

-- Robert Stewart, 45, a three-time divorcee and high school dropout
with "violent tendencies" -- according to one of his ex-wives -- who
shot up the nursing home in Carthage, N.C., where his newly estranged
wife worked.

-- Lovelle Mixon, 26, a paroled felon, struggling to get his life back
on track by pimping, who shot four cops in Oakland, Calif. -- before
eventually being shot himself.

-- Twenty-eight-year-old Michael McLendon, child of divorce, living with
his mother and boycotting family funerals because he hated his
relatives, who killed 10 of those relatives and their neighbors in
Samson, Ala.

It might make more sense to outlaw men than guns. Or divorce. Or crack.
Or to prohibit felons from having guns. Except we already outlaw crack
and felons owning guns and yet still, somehow, Wong got crack and Mixon
got a gun.

After being pulled over for a routine traffic violation, Lovelle Mixon
did exactly what they teach in driver's ed by immediately shooting four
cops. Mixon's supporters held a posthumous rally in his honor, claiming
he shot the cops only in "self-defense," which I take it includes the
cop Mixon shot while the officer was lying on the ground.

I guess Mixon also raped that 12-year-old girl in "self-defense."
Clearly, the pimping industry has lost a good man. I wish I'd known him.
I tip my green velvet fedora with the dollar signs all over it to him.
Why do the good ones always die young? Pimps, I mean.

Liberals tolerate rallies on behalf of cop-killers, but they prohibit
law-abiding citizens working at community centers in Binghamton, N.Y.,
from being armed to defend themselves from disturbed, crack-addicted
America-haters like Jiverly Wong.

It's something in liberals' DNA: They think they can pass a law
eliminating guns and nuclear weapons, but teenagers having sex is
completely beyond our control.

The demand for more gun control in response to any crime involving a gun
is exactly like Obama's response to North Korea's openly belligerent act
of launching a long-range missile this week: Obama leapt to action by
calling for worldwide nuclear disarmament.

If the SAT test were used to determine how stupid a liberal is, one
question would be: "The best defense against lawless rogues who possess
_______ is for law-abiding individuals to surrender their own
_______________."

Correct answer: Guns. We would also have accepted nuclear weapons.

Obama explained that "the United States has a moral responsibility" to
lead disarmament efforts because America is "the only nuclear power to
have used a nuclear weapon."

So don't go feeling all morally superior to a country whose business
model consists of exporting heroin, nuclear bombs and counterfeit U.S.
dollars, and of importing Swedish prostitutes, you yahoo Americans with
your little flag lapel pins.

On the other hand, the Japanese haven't acted up much in the last, say,
64 years ...

Fortunately, our sailors didn't wait around for Obama to save them when
Somali pirates boarded their ship this week. Stop right now or I'll ask
the U.N. to remind the "international community" that "the U.S. is not
at war with Somali pirates."

Gun-toting Americans are clearly more self-sufficient than the sissy
Europeans. This is great news for everyone except Barney Frank, who's
always secretly wondered what it would be like to be taken by a Somali
pirate.

Police -- whom I gather liberals intend to continue having guns -- and
intrepid U.N. resolution drafters can't be everywhere, all the time.

If a single civilian in that Binghamton community center had been armed,
instead of 14 dead, there might have only been one or two -- including
the shooter. In the end, the cops didn't stop Wong. His killing spree
ended only when he decided to stop, and he killed himself.

"The shooter will eventually run out of ammo" strategy may not be the
best one for stopping deranged multiple murderers.

But it's highly unlikely that any community center in the entire state
would be safe from a disturbed former crack-addict like Wong because New
York's restrictive gun laws require a citizen to prove he has a need for
a gun to obtain a concealed carry permit.

Instead of having Planned Parenthood distribute condoms in schools, they
ought to get the NRA to pass out revolvers. It would save more lives.
 

Tophog

God made the Garand !
I just finished reading her new book,

GIULTY - Liberal 'victims' and their assault on America

It's excellent! I recommend it to every patriot. I'm glad we have her as an outspoken critic of the liberals.
 

DarrellM5

New member
I really enjoy all of her stuff. I subscribe to her emails through human events. I also have her audio books.
 

michael2m

New member
It doesn't matter

It doesn't matter what she says. She preaches to the choir. She writes and speaks in order to shock the other side, and sell her books. I would say the same about Michael Moore. His credibility is compromised by his seeming inabilitiy to look at the other side of issues. Both have lost their ability to sway the opinions of those who are swayable because of their inflexible views.
 

Ektarr

Dedicated Infidel
It doesn't matter what she says. She preaches to the choir. She writes and speaks in order to shock the other side, and sell her books. I would say the same about Michael Moore. His credibility is compromised by his seeming inabilitiy to look at the other side of issues. Both have lost their ability to sway the opinions of those who are swayable because of their inflexible views.

The same could be said of virtually ANYone who writes! Everyone who writes, and subsequently speaks, does so in order to sell books. As for her preaching to the choir, who else is she going to speak to? Liberals hear her choirspeech in the form of "message overflow", and get her message as a result. The choir, on the other hand, occasionally needs a bit of a kick in the ass to remind them of which way the wind is blowing.

Regarding"inflexibility", perhaps you would rather she were more willing to "compromise". How much you figure you're willing to give up? Personally, I think we need more Conservatives willing to take a firm stand, draw a line, and declare that this is the place beyond which there IS no room for compromise. We have enough people "representing" us who are willing to compromise our Rights away for the sake of political expediency. Or financial gain.

When is enough, enough? You may think she's too inflexible. I'll take the hardass. At least I know where she stands.
 
W

wolfhunter

Guest
The same could be said of virtually ANYone who writes! Everyone who writes, and subsequently speaks, does so in order to sell books. As for her preaching to the choir, who else is she going to speak to? Liberals hear her choirspeech in the form of "message overflow", and get her message as a result. The choir, on the other hand, occasionally needs a bit of a kick in the ass to remind them of which way the wind is blowing.

Regarding"inflexibility", perhaps you would rather she were more willing to "compromise". How much you figure you're willing to give up? Personally, I think we need more Conservatives willing to take a firm stand, draw a line, and declare that this is the place beyond which there IS no room for compromise. We have enough people "representing" us who are willing to compromise our Rights away for the sake of political expediency. Or financial gain.

When is enough, enough? You may think she's too inflexible. I'll take the hardass. At least I know where she stands.

+1, Ektarr. Conservatives didn't make it to the National Election ticket, except as Third Party candidates, because someone decided they needed to compromise until they were no longer conservative.
 

New Threads

Members online

No members online now.

Forum statistics

Threads
49,133
Messages
621,655
Members
74,105
Latest member
Tactical Billy
Top