UN tightening it's grip on US


festus

God Bless Our Troops!!!
During the Bush regime, GWB signed an agreement in Canada that would allow the WHO take charge of a legitimate pandemic and for them to use UN resources to enforce quantine zones and "assist" with medical situations.

UN peacekeepers are not able to provide comfort and care. They can barely direct traffic. What purpose would they actually serve?

enforcing martial law in a quarantine!
 

Ironhorse

New member
This has lately become a big concern for me. When the Obamanation admitted to El Presidente, down in Mexico, that he didn't have the pull to outright ban guns in the U.S., I didn't think he'd give up on that issue. With the recent dispatches coming out of D.H.S. labeling various groups as "terrorists," I'm beginning to think the stage is being set for the U.N. peacekeeping forces to invade the U.S. and forcibly disarm American citizens.

I've struggled to *NOT* be a conspiracy theorist - as in the past, I've dismissed those crying "conspiracy!" as not being very in touch with reality. But my gut's telling me that something smells really, really bad. God, I hope I'm wrong.:fie:
 

MADnMO

Jesus - Our Greatest HOPE
I for one DO NOT recognize the UN as having any authority to do any thing in this country. They are not welcome and would be foolish to come to my house.
 

Ironhorse

New member
I for one DO NOT recognize the UN as having any authority to do any thing in this country. They are not welcome and would be foolish to come to my house.

I agree with you, for what it's worth. The U.N. has its place, but not within our borders. But, we're talking about a bunch of individuals, or perhaps small groups - vs. military units. If that scenario comes to be, I have little doubt that some will fight. But, sadly - I don't see it being much of a fight. One man, no matter how good, cannot prevail against the kind of overwhelming firepower that would be brought to bear. Mind you, this is purely conjecture. And as I stated before, I hope and pray that I am wrong.
 

MADnMO

Jesus - Our Greatest HOPE
I agree with you, for what it's worth. The U.N. has its place, but not within our borders. But, we're talking about a bunch of individuals, or perhaps small groups - vs. military units. If that scenario comes to be, I have little doubt that some will fight. But, sadly - I don't see it being much of a fight. One man, no matter how good, cannot prevail against the kind of overwhelming firepower that would be brought to bear. Mind you, this is purely conjecture. And as I stated before, I hope and pray that I am wrong.

I would bet that MO could put up a pretty formidable resistance. LOL
 

HK4U

New member
UN peacekeepers are not able to provide comfort and care. They can barely direct traffic. What purpose would they actually serve?

Round up the sheeple, take their guns and escort them to reeducation facilities.
 

DougG

New member
I have felt for a very long time that the UN should be kick out of our US of A and we should pull out of the organization. The UN has gotten so big they cannot do anything and get buried in world poiticts so that the best they can do is pass relolutions. Gun control here in the States is something they would rally behind and do there best. I for one would come to the aid of any one around me to stop any UN troops from taking guns from any US citisen and would fight to protect my Country. My Country may well be the Republic Of Texas if that should happen.
 

OUTTAHERE

New member
UN Peacekeepers are a joke

The UN is nothing more than an ORGANIZATION. It has no standing army, only mal-trained volunteers from
around the world's third world countries. I do not see the UN as a physical threat but it is a political threat
to be sure. Should someone want to come up with a One World Government, the UN would be the front for
the powerful people working behind the scenes to seize power. I'm afraid that we have underestimated our
faceless enemy, the monied and powerful people around the world, who think that they can run our lives
better than we can under our own constitution. Conspiracy theories aside, it can not be denied that there
are forces at work undermining our way of life, controlling our banking system, nationalizing what's left of
our manufacturing base and shortly will debase our currency through inflation or hyper-inflation that will
eat up our savings and relegate everyone who is not a multi-millionaire to a substandard way of life.
Conspiracy is one thing, but reality is another. We're seeing the reality of what is happening and where we
are going, if we choose to open our eyes that is.
 

Red Hat

New member
Any non-citizen wearing a uniform and carrying a firearm is an invader and will be treated as such!. All they will be doing is adding to my gun collection. :victory:
 

CathyInBlue

Tool Maker
Are you really gonna leave your sniper's nest/upstairs bedroom, to go collect the weapons of the enemy?

From 1000 yards, their corpses can keep their rifles.
 

Red Hat

New member
I have a feeling they will be laying around everywhere. Just like picking strawberries.:biggrin:
 

abock33

New member
I agree with you, for what it's worth. The U.N. has its place, but not within our borders. But, we're talking about a bunch of individuals, or perhaps small groups - vs. military units. If that scenario comes to be, I have little doubt that some will fight. But, sadly - I don't see it being much of a fight. One man, no matter how good, cannot prevail against the kind of overwhelming firepower that would be brought to bear. Mind you, this is purely conjecture. And as I stated before, I hope and pray that I am wrong.

I agree with you about small groups vs Military units. we don't stand a chance.

If this actually happends we need to come together and defend our Constitution. I wouldn't call me a Conspiracy Theorist but I would say that I like to be prepared. I got a lot of good information out of this essay I found on here. I think it has some good points. It is long though.Armed Resistance Against Gun Control: When Is It Time To Start Shooting?

I think its time for the population heighten their senses a little more. I would like for the USA to stay free for me and our future generations to come.
 

stumpjumper101

New member
I agree with you, for what it's worth. The U.N. has its place, but not within our borders. But, we're talking about a bunch of individuals, or perhaps small groups - vs. military units. If that scenario comes to be, I have little doubt that some will fight. But, sadly - I don't see it being much of a fight. One man, no matter how good, cannot prevail against the kind of overwhelming firepower that would be brought to bear. Mind you, this is purely conjecture. And as I stated before, I hope and pray that I am wrong.

the way i see it our military cant completely surpress the insurgent's in iraq and afganistan after all these years being there, two countrys relatively the size of texas or smaller, loaded with guys with ak's and rpg's who apparently shoot a lot of ammo and hit very little. here in this country we have 80 million+ gun owners of that a large portion are hunters who can with ease hit a prarie dog or groundhog with ease at 400 yards or more. our gun owners also have paid good hard earned money for the ammo that they have, so every shot fired will be done with the full intent to make a conection. Yes some will fight shoud it come to that and some will roll right over and give them up. the only thing we can hope for if it comes to that is that people get togeather in large groups rather than wait til they just come to your yard cause they can just surround your house and burn it up like WACO. i dont see how the UN or even the US military can think they will be able to suppress an area the size of the USA when they couldnt do it to bosnia, somalia, iraq or afganistan and now we are headed to pakistan. now what do all these people have in common, they are willing to die for their cause. the question is are We willing to do the same to keep our Freedom
 

Ironhorse

New member
I agree, that if we were talking about a straight shooting match, it might be a somewhat even fight - but it wouldn't be. I'm talking about Main Battle Tanks, Armored Personnel Carriers, Fast Attack Vehicles, and Helicopters. One could barricade ones self in one's house. But when a 20mm cannon cuts loose, the walls of one's house is no barrier. That's the point I'm trying to make... It wouldn't be a platoon of soldiers going block to block. It would be a military unit, with serious armament to back it up.
 

CathyInBlue

Tool Maker
You can outrun the Impala, but you can't out run the Motorola.
You can hold off the batallion, but you can't hold off the Vulcan.
 

stumpjumper101

New member
for all of us i hope that day never comes, but its looking more like its just around the corner with every day that passes. America is the worlds problem solver's and when that problem lands in our back yard im sure we will find a way to solve it as well. I wont be one of the ones who rolls over and gives them up. they can have my freedom when im done with it!
 

abock33

New member
I agree, that if we were talking about a straight shooting match, it might be a somewhat even fight - but it wouldn't be. I'm talking about Main Battle Tanks, Armored Personnel Carriers, Fast Attack Vehicles, and Helicopters. One could barricade ones self in one's house. But when a 20mm cannon cuts loose, the walls of one's house is no barrier. That's the point I'm trying to make... It wouldn't be a platoon of soldiers going block to block. It would be a military unit, with serious armament to back it up.

This is true. I think there will be a huge number of soldiers that choose to defend their familys. Lets hope they choose to do it with the tanks that they are in at the time. That might tilt the scales a bit.
 

Tex4oc

Patriot 1st
I'm not a Conspiracy guy like Mel, but I too see the writing on the wall, and it says polish your ammo and oil your guns, 'cause there's a storm a brewin'. And no I've never read "Catcher in the rye"....... oooops now I've done it, the computers at Langley are goin' nuts right now!!!
 

HK4U

New member
If if walks talks and looks like a duck it is a duck. If it walks talks and looks like a conspiracy then it most likely is.
 

Tea For One

New member
This has lately become a big concern for me. When the Obamanation admitted to El Presidente, down in Mexico, that he didn't have the pull to outright ban guns in the U.S., I didn't think he'd give up on that issue. With the recent dispatches coming out of D.H.S. labeling various groups as "terrorists," I'm beginning to think the stage is being set for the U.N. peacekeeping forces to invade the U.S. and forcibly disarm American citizens.

I've struggled to *NOT* be a conspiracy theorist - as in the past, I've dismissed those crying "conspiracy!" as not being very in touch with reality. But my gut's telling me that something smells really, really bad. God, I hope I'm wrong.:fie:

I could not agree with you more. I have a bad feeling about this.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
49,140
Messages
621,693
Members
74,108
Latest member
USNACCS
Top