Key Takeaways
- Gun Owners of America filed a federal lawsuit challenging U.S. Virgin Islands’ restrictions on nonresident gun ownership.
- The lawsuit claims the territory doesn’t allow nonresidents to bear arms, even with valid licenses from other jurisdictions.
- Plaintiff Sean Dale Henry holds a Florida license but can’t apply for a carry license in the USVI due to residency restrictions.
- Gun Owners of America argues that the Second Amendment applies to all Americans, including nonresidents traveling to the territory.
- The case questions the legality of the USVI’s law restricting nonresidents’ rights to carry firearms after the Supreme Court’s Bruen decision.
Estimated reading time: 5 minutes
CHARLOTTE AMALIE, VI — Gun Owners of America, Gun Owners Foundation, and individual plaintiff Sean Dale Henry filed a federal lawsuit on July 20, 2026, challenging the U.S. Virgin Islands’ refusal to let nonresident Americans keep or bear arms anywhere in the territory. Henry v. Brooks was filed in the District Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Thomas and St. John, and names Virgin Islands Police Department Commissioner Mario Brooks, in his official capacity, and the Government of the Virgin Islands as defendants.
The complaint alleges the USVI provides no avenue at all for Americans without a “bona fide residence or place of business” in the territory to exercise the right to keep and bear arms. According to the filing, 23 V.I.C. § 452 generally bans nonresidents from bearing arms even if they are licensed by another jurisdiction, 14 V.I.C. § 2253 prohibits open carry, and 23 V.I.C. § 454 limits carry licenses to five narrow categories that leave ordinary nonresidents with no way to even apply.
Here is the reciprocity piece in plain terms. In the states, permit recognition happens two ways. Some states sign formal agreements with each other. Others simply honor out-of-state permits on their own, no agreement needed. My concealed carry reciprocity maps show exactly which states honor which permits. The Virgin Islands does neither. The complaint alleges that shortly after the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision recognized a right to carry in public for self-defense, the territory repealed its limited concealed carry reciprocity law. Since then, the filing says, the USVI does not recognize the firearm license of any state or territory.
Think about what that leaves a visiting gun owner. No recognition of your permit. No open carry. No application process. Zero legal path.
Henry’s situation shows how that works in practice. According to GOA’s press release, he holds a valid Florida Concealed Weapon License, is a Federal Firearms Licensee, and meets every qualification for a USVI carry license except residency. He plans to travel to St. Thomas, and the law bars him from even applying.
“The Second Amendment doesn’t end at the shoreline,” said Luis Valdes, USVI Outreach Director for Gun Owners of America and National Co-Chair of Fuerza 2A. “Americans don’t lose their constitutional rights simply because they travel to a U.S. territory. The USVI has created a system where law-abiding citizens are categorically denied the ability to exercise a fundamental constitutional right based solely on where they live.”
The legal foundation here is not complicated. The complaint points out that Congress extended the Second Amendment to the Virgin Islands by statute, 48 U.S.C. § 1561, and it leans on Heller’s holding that the right “belongs to all Americans” and Bruen’s holding that it includes carrying in public for self-defense. The plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief, and per GOA, they are asking the court to require the territory to accept carry license applications from qualified nonresidents. GOA says the case builds on its earlier litigation that opened nonresident permit applications in California and New York.
To be clear, these are allegations in a complaint, and the court has not ruled on any of them. The territory will get its chance to answer.
More from USA Carry:
What stands out to me is the completeness of the shutout. Most restrictive jurisdictions leave at least one door cracked open, a nonresident application, limited recognition, something. If the complaint’s description of USVI law holds up, this territory closed every door at once, and did it right after the Supreme Court said the right to carry in public belongs to all Americans. Part of a serious carry mindset is knowing the law everywhere you travel, and right now the law in the Virgin Islands tells a licensed, vetted, federally credentialed American that none of it counts the moment he steps off the plane. That is exactly the kind of scheme Bruen was supposed to end, and now a federal court gets to say whether it does.
I will continue tracking Henry v. Brooks as it moves through the District Court of the Virgin Islands.
