The Disappointing Yet Understandable Fate Of Top-Break Revolvers

top break

A few people have mused at some point that top-break revolvers would actually make more sense as a defensive pistol than swing-out cylinders. They were also one of the most popular designs well into the 20th century but eventually were phased out.


Because they became obsolete, mostly due to changes in ammunition.

The Top Break Was Formerly A Dominant Revolver Design

webley top break

After the advent of cartridges, the two dominant revolver designs were the fixed-cylinder (Colt Single Action) and the top-break, which was first devised by Smith and Wesson in the third generation of the Model 1-½ in .32 S&W. (Previous models were actually tip-up.) The Model 1-½ was a vest-pocket gun, intended for concealed carry, as was the Model 2 Single Action (different from the Model 2 Army; another tip-up) in .38 S&W.

The single-action Model 3 – the Schofield – followed in 1870, staying in production until 1915. The Model 3 was a popular service pistol with the US Army and was offered in .44 and .45 caliber, though not .45 Colt.

Double-action operation arrived in the late 1880s, Smith and Wesson came up with the Safety Hammerless, a DAO revolver with an internal hammer and a grip safety, which was popularly known as the “Lemon Squeezer” and stayed in production into the 1940s.

A host of other companies followed suit. One of the best-known was Iver Johnson, whose Safety Automatic and Safety Hammerless double-action top-break pistols also introduced the transfer bar and an integrated trigger safety – almost a century before Glock thought of it.

The Brits weren’t far behind, most notably with Enfield and later Webley and Scott revolvers. The latter became a commonly-issued service pistol throughout the British empire into the 1970s.

The party piece was the self-extracting cylinder. When the hinge is activated near the rear sight, the extractor pushes the cartridges out as the cylinder is pushed forward. Cartridges can get cleared and the cylinder reloaded in a hurry, especially if one carries a model compatible with moon clips such as the later Webley revolver models.

Though a person can get pretty fast with practice using a speedloader or moon clips, a top break makes this process even faster. For the civilian carrier, that’s pretty advantageous. Why aren’t they really a thing anymore?

Smokeless Powder And Modern Case Lengths Are Not Compatible

iver johnson top break

Two factors did in the top-break revolver: smokeless powder and case length.

The first factor is that smokeless powder produces higher chamber pressures than black powder does on a unit-by-unit basis. That’s why you can’t use modern ammunition in those repro revolvers that assert to chamber .45 Colt, .357 Magnum, .38 Special and so on.

The rounds that the old top-breaks were all chambered for back in the day had lower velocities and lower chamber pressures than pistol rounds of today. Since the frame actually separated, there isn’t sufficient structural rigidity to handle the high pressures of today’s ammunition.

Pressure levels that most top-breaks are capable of handling on a regular basis top out below 20,000 psi. Today’s magnum revolver rounds generate more than 25,000 psi of chamber pressure and in some cases, close to 40,000 psi.

Longer case lengths were also known to be problematic for top-break ejectors. The longer the case, the harder it is for the case head to clear the rear of the cylinder upon ejection. In service-size pistols, that isn’t an issue as the Webley revolvers chambered cartridges of typical size. Then again, the Webley was a service pistol roughly comparable to an L-frame. In compact revolvers, the top-break just doesn’t work as well unless a very short cartridge is used.

Most people looking for a revolver these days either want a snubby .38 Special for concealed carry, a .22 for plinking or small game, or a magnum for defense or hunting. Top-break revolvers don’t work as well for the former role given the case length in the small calibers and pressure generated by the +P rounds most carry, and can’t work in the lattermost role.

That said, there are still a few about for curious person. The reproduction companies make reproduction Model 3 revolvers, some even in .38 Special and .45 Colt, which you can actually find ammunition for. They are best used with cowboy loads but can withstand the lower end of standard pressure ammunition, so they will definitely work as a nightstand gun.

No Code Needed
CCI Blazer Brass 9mm 124gr FMJ Ammunition 50rds

CCI Blazer Brass 9mm 124gr FMJ Ammunition 50rds

CCI Blazer Brass 9mm 124gr FMJ Ammunition 50rds for $15.50

$159.99 (Reg. $259.99)
No Code Needed
SCCY CPX-1 9mm Black & Stainless Pistol w/ Safety, (1 Magazine)

SCCY CPX-1 9mm Black & Stainless Pistol w/ Safety, (1 Magazine)

Looking for a cheap 9mm? You can grab a SCCY CPX-1 9mm Black & Stainless Pistol w/ Safety, (1 Magazine) for $159.99 right now at Palmetto State Armory

25% OFF!
Vertx 25% Off

Vertx 25% OFF Coupon Code

I've partnered up with Vertx to get you 25% off everything from their site. They make high-quality tactical clothing and gear. Just use the coupon code: usacarry

Previous articleThe Four Safety Rules are for Fighting, Not Just Range Safety
Next articleSpringfield Armory SAINT AR-15 Pistol Review [FIRST LOOK]
Sam Hoober is Contributing Editor for Alien Gear Holsters, where he writes about gun accessories, gun safety, open and concealed carry tips. He also contributes a bi-weekly column for Daily Caller. In his free time, Sam enjoys camping, hunting and spending time at the gun range as often as possible.
5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

yet, this ‘article’ fails to address the current .32 S&W available for top loaders, such as the ‘lemon squeezer’ – what are some stats/figures on the ammo, compatibility with older top loaders, etc?


NAA has just re-issued a top break in a 22 Mag Mini revolver. How does that fit in?

John Tardif

Then why are these people able to make a Top Break Revolver in .357 Magnum?