For some reason, the 1911 hangs on. Some people insist that it’s all they would trust their life to and that it’s the greatest handgun ever made.
Hogwash.
Some people hear the ramblings of older shooters. During times of shortage of handguns, the proliferate nature of 1911 manufactures may make it a more readily-available choice of pistol.
At the time of its invention, it was a technological leap forward. Today? It’s aggressively obsolescent, and there is almost no tangible benefit to using one if a more modern alternative is available.
If you were thinking of getting one for use as a carry gun, here are 6 reasons why it’s a terrible choice.
The 1911 Is HEAVY
A Gov’t frame 1911 weighs 38 to 42 ounces unloaded. Add 8 rounds of 230-grain hardball to it – 1 oz = 437 grains – and you’re now up to 42 to 46 oz. That’s almost 3 lbs of gun and ammunition.
Lugging one around is miserable. And I know – I carried one for the better part of 2 years until I got wise. Longer-term users report back and hip problems from toting one in some cases.
It doesn’t matter how good your belt is; you feel gravity fighting you every time you stand up.
The 1911 Is Huge
The standard gun is 8.5 inches long and 5.5 inches tall. That’s enormous. Sure, the slide is slim but with the grips and controls, it’s barely any narrower than modern service pistols.
If you’ve ever carried one inside the waistband, it takes up an enormous amount of space and makes sitting down awkward.
1911 Capacity Sucks
The standard 1911 holds 7+1 or 8+1 (depending on magazine) if chambered in .45 ACP and 9+1 or 10+1 if chambered in 9mm, which improves the gun’s capacity from laughable to merely pathetic.
The original 5-inch gun is larger and heavier than a Glock 21, the full-size Glock pistol in .45 ACP. If .45 is your thing, the Glock 21 holds 13+1 of it.
The Officer or CCO variants only make matters worse; 6/7+1 in .45 ACP and 8/9+1 in 9mm.
Sure, you can say “something something 2011” but precious few double-stack 1911 pistols are realistically good carry guns (have you ever seen an STI 2011 in person? they’re HUGE) and most are prohibitively expensive.
You Don’t Need A 1911 To Shoot Accurately
A person could raise the objections of “Two World Wars” and competitive shooters using 1911 pistols.
For starters, small arms are rarely the deciding factor in armed conflicts and those top flight competitive shooters aren’t running factory guns from their local gun store, but heavily tuned custom pistols.
And plenty of world championship pistol shooting has been done with Glocks, CZs, Tanfoglios and other makes/models. Point being, while a person can shoot one very accurately…you don’t need one to do so. That comes from putting in the reps.
You’ll Spend More On A 1911…One Way Or The Other
It isn’t that you have to buy a hand-fit, match-grade 1911 to get one that’s reliable; there are some factory guns that are. But if you try to “save money” by getting a cheaper import…chances are you’ll need to do some fettling to get it there.
Extractors needing a tune-up, feed ramps in need of a polish, the installation of some decent sights, a spring kit – oh, and don’t forget those Wilson Combat magazines you’ll need to buy, too – and so on will all cost you, especially if you have a gunsmith do the work.
Chances are that if you get a budget gun, you’re going to end up spending enough in tuning it up for you to have just bought a good one to begin with. Is it guaranteed? No, but there’s a good chance.
The 1911 Is Not For Newbies Or Casuals
Another hitch when it comes to 1911 pistols is that they are not for newbies or casuals.
A 1911 pistol has to be maintained – especially lubricated, and frequently – to run reliably. Everything inside the gun is metal; it has to run wet.
To become proficient at running a pistol with a manual safety that has to be used, you have to train with it. A LOT.
In other words, running a 1911 requires more commitment than other pistol platforms in terms of care and training. It isn’t ideal for the total newbie or the guy who just buys a gun, loads it, and throws it in the nightstand.
Well written article will all the talking points, however, poorly thought out. Persons arguing grip thickness would have to cut out the G19 and similar sized guns in favor of a slimmer (smaller) gun. Like a single stack G43 or worse G42, maybe even a shield. Yes you could say the P365 was the game changer but then again you loose critical velocity unless it is an XL sized gun, making it huge in the writers words. I see alot of bias here in the article, but each to their own.
This is quite possibly the most idiotic article on firearms I’ve ever read. If you can’t handle carrying a 1911 you have some serious problems that aren’t fixed with a carry piece. I don t know where you got your 1911s, but I’ve never experienced any of the issues that you claim. I’ve never owned a high end piece and my daily carry for years was a Rock Island 1911 in .45 acp. I have 10 damaged discs in my spine and I’ve never had any of those problems.
This is the point at which I’d question your manhood or some other shot at you personally but it pretty much speaks for itself. The issues that you claim are ridiculous and non existant. What a fragile creature you must be.
My first semiauto pistol was a 1911. I qualified with one in the Army. I was issued a Kimber on one of my security contracts in Iraq. My wife and I each own one and enjoy shooting them. They are great guns and I’m sure they will be aorund forever.
But neither of us carries one EDC for all the reasons the author notes.
They are big, heavy, have a low capcity, and I don’t completely trust their reliability. When I want to carry a full size .45 ACP, I carry my G21. Otherwise I carry a 9mm. Loyalty to a favorite gun is fine, but practticality trumps it every time.