Anyone involved in the Second Amendment community, no matter how casually, has run into the passionate opposition to gun rights embraced by a portion of the population. While it’s true that most Americans do support the right to keep and bear arms, we’re a large nation with a diverse population and there are contrary opinions. And when it comes to them, I’ll open with a controversial statement:
That’s OK, too.
They have every right to that opinion. They’re in the wrong, but the First Amendment guarantees their right to be. However we have freedom of speech as well, and I think that right is just as important as the Second Amendment when it comes to defending liberty for all. So how can we engaging the conversation—it’s coming whether we want it or not—in a productive way that advances our cause?
Here are my suggestions:
First and foremost: be polite!
This is a subject that evokes strong feelings in a lot of people, and it’s easy to get carried away regardless of your position. Don’t be that guy—the angry, aggressive gun owner is a stereotype the media loves. It’s incumbent upon us to be better behaved than the average citizen. If an armed society is a polite society, we need to be the most courteous folks around.
Ask questions.
Everyone has reasons for believing the things they do. When it comes to the Second Amendment and firearms in general, there’s a huge amount of myth and misinformation out there. A great many folks learned everything they know about guns from Hollywood—generally not a great source for accurate information. Gently correcting some of these misunderstandings may be the first step in changing their minds.
Do your research.
The data overwhelmingly supports the right to keep and bear arms. From the effect of CCW on crime rates, to the behavior of folks in the concealed carry community, the facts are on our side. It’s best practice for us to keep reading, learning, and educating ourselves on the subject. The facts go a long way toward crafting a solid argument for gun ownership.
Do their research.
They present facts and arguments too, and we need to be familiar with and understand their positions—again, it’s best practice. So while you’re looking for your own sources, take a look at what they’re saying and give it some honest thought and evaluation.
Finally: be polite!
This is so important that I’m listing it twice. Keep your cool! You’re representing all of us on a very important issue, and as an ambassador for gun owners everywhere you need to conduct yourself as such. I don’t care how many insults they throw at you or what they do. Keep calm and carry on.
It’s fully possible for people to discuss an issue civilly and with kindness and understanding. This applies to all discourse, not just the Second Amendment—something to keep in mind in an election year.
Have you had productive conversations with folks from the other side? I’d love to hear about it in the comments or via email. So get in touch and until then—stay safe out there.
It’s hard to hold a honest conversation with anyone who refuses to admit that the problem isn’t the gun, it’s the person using it
Which is precisely why background checks are a necessary part of an armed society.
No, Justified Shooting Laws are a necessary part of an armed society.
The criminal minded do not get weapons legally or lawfully, it stops nobody with a goal to commit a crime. But Laws that take your weapon away for defending yourself and restrict where and when you can use any weapon, that’s what hinders “cleansing of the pool”.
Furthermore, we allowed business & corporations to become “private entity” as if people, with more rights than people in fact, they are above the law and constantly seek to avoid & subvert it, especially in the firearm section. That has to go also, boycotts don’t do enough.
As for the national registry database, that’s for confiscation whenever we get to the martial law conditions (or a state of emergency).
Sorry, but this is almost totally the wrong approach (other than “be polite”). Gun opposition is mostly an emotional issue. You can know the facts inside and out and be the most “correct” guy in the room, but it won’t do diddily-squat to change how your opponent “feels” about it. You need to change hearts, not minds, and you cannot do that with facts and research alone. The key here is to play that emotional game against them by trying to find out what they fear (or better yet, something negative that scared them firsthand and did not involve a gun) and then try to identify another story to tell them that was just as scary or worse, but turned out OK because a gun was involved. It’s nearly impossible to do, but it is more effective than flinging pro 2A factoids against a brick wall and then wondering why nothing sticks.
“Hearts & Minds” where have you heard that before ?
And you thought it was about applying our ideology to foreigners ?
No, it was about brainwashing the new generations into the NWO goals.
I’ve earned $84 ,000 already this season working via internet and I’m a full time college student . I’m by making use of an internet business project I found out about and additionally I’ve made this kind of great money . It’s undoubtedly simple to use so I am just very satisfied that I found out regarding it . The possibility within this is endless . Here’s stuff that I do, please have a look at my account for site name >>>
Good discussion, folks. I believe that when you “open carry,” that is a very bad way to stimulate discussion. The “phobes” are intimidated by that. “Concealed carry” tends to keep the topic from coming up, especially if your hand-gun doesn’t “print.” I have been known to join an ongoing discussion on the topic, and being polite is a big part of being “right.” If you lose your cool, no one will see your point of view as “right.”