Let’s have a little fun by bashing some handguns that deserve it. Let’s face it: some of the most popular pistols are not perfect by any stretch of the imagination. Some fanboys and fangirls have gotten entirely out of hand and need to reign it in a bit.
Let’s start this roast.
Glock 19
The Glock 19 is not perfection. It never was. It never will be.
The Walther PPQ? You’d be on to something. But let’s get real.
The trigger sucks. The polymer sights are flimsy. The grip angle isn’t actually that great, which is confirmable since the custom Glock frames (such as Polymer 80 and so on) all use the 18-degree grip angle of the 1911 rather than Glock’s 22-degree rake. Legions of Tactical Kyles won’t shut up about it, and frankly, they cost too much for what little you get in terms of features.
Do they work? You bet they do. Thousands of police departments, competitive shooters, and so on aren’t wrong. They are an excellent working pistol in terms of reliability and function, but they aren’t the be-all, end-all. Other pistols run just as reliably and either cost less or give you more and better features for the same amount (or just a little bit more) of money.
Sig P320
The Sig P320 is a beef-witted lunk. You can use the slide for a boat anchor. Arguably the biggest reason the army chose them is Sig Sauer was asking way less money than Glock was. (About $100 million less.) The trigger stinks, and frankly, the so-called “compact” models are only compact in the sense that they are smaller than a battleship.
The 1911
This one hurts because I love them, but frankly 1911 pistols have to get tossed in here too. The 1911 is old. The carrying capacity is pathetic relative to the size and expense. You have to spend a lot to get a good one, and how is it that no one besides Wilson Combat has been able to make a magazine worth a damn? While the 1911 is one of the most beloved handguns, it’s far from the best.
.45 ACP is not really the man stopper some people say it is. 9mm is just as effective and cheaper to boot.
Okay, the ergonomics are great, but so what? Carrying a 3.5-lb Gov’t frame is a chore. I love mine to death, but I don’t carry it anymore for that reason. Granted, I’m probably going to buy a lightweight commander and start carrying that because I miss it but still. It is a highly effective platform; there’s a reason why so many champion shooters and civilians still lug them around. But let’s not kid anyone that there are some real limitations.
Anything 10mm
10mm fans seem to think that their pistol is Ol’ Death and Destruction, but the truth is they just aren’t. Handloads can push the 10mm into the bottom end of .41 Magnum territory but so what? Hardly anyone loads their own these days.
Furthermore, study after study confirms that handguns don’t have “stopping power” and that placement is really everything.
If you really want to stop someone with one shot? Get a 12-gauge and load it with slugs. More than 1 oz of lead in center mass is a much greater persuader. 10mm is a great round all things considered, and you can do a lot with it to be sure, but hearing this stuff is getting old.
Ditto .44 Magnum
I know what you’re thinking. Being that the .44 Magnum was never the most powerful handgun in the world, and at this range can blow the head clean off your wallet, you just have to ask yourself one question.
What’s the point unless you hunt or live in bear country?
It’s Called The Desert Eagle Because It Dries Up Your Bank Account
![Bobbfwed [CC BY-SA 3.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DesertEagle_50AE.jpg)
Last but not least is the Desert Eagle. It isn’t the least of anything because it’s almost too big to use. It’s also more expensive than a range toy deserves to be. They’re known for more jams than Smuckers.
Good luck finding .50 AE ammo…and get ready to go broke when you do.
Granted, a few folks get them because they want a semi-auto that can deter four-legged threats, and it is one of the few that can. Fair enough on that front, but most people get them as range toys. This is just one goofy person’s opinion, but there are range toys that are less expensive and way more fun (Henry Golden Boy rifles, for instance) to boot.
That said, you do what you feel is best. If a gun feels right to you, and if it’s what you want, then get it, shoot it and enjoy it! Let us know about it. Are there any handguns YOU think are overrated? Sound off in the comments!
I agree with all of choices especially the Glock!
Most of these complaints are spot-on, but the issue is that they cover the large majority of the concealed carry weapons in service today. A concealed carrier should carry what he or she is comfortable carrying, what can be concealed without printing, what is deemed to be appropriate (caliber-wise), what’s reliable, and what the carrier can afford to train with. Let’s face it; guns are expensive, and even if the shooter reloads, range time isn’t cheap. Choices for carry always end up being a trade-off based on these characteristics…because if you are carrying just for the “cool guy” factor and haven’t put some serious thoughts into these considerations, you get what you asked for if you are ever in a situation where you actually need to employ your sidekick.
The reality is that no handgun is the be-all, do-all gun of the gun universe. They all have pros and cons, and like automobiles how much anyone likes one has a lot to do with personal preference. Guns get hyped by internet writers who often have relationships with the companies that make them and they proclaim them as the best gun ever built and one no one can live without. The worst handgun I ever owned was a Walther, but other people swear by them. I bought a P320 Compact as my first (and only) Sig. I hated it and sold it a few months later. My wife and I both have 1911s that we shoot occasionally at the range but would never carry them EDC. As long as the gun is reliable, it’s all a matter of taste.