Deceptive Anti-Gun Filmmakers Face $12 Million Lawsuit

Deceptive Anti-Gun Filmmakers Face $12 Million Lawsuit

Remember earlier this year when documentary director Stephanie Soechtig and her producer Katie Couric were caught deceptively editing their anti-gun documentary Under the Gun to make gun proponents look uninformed? Well, now the filmmakers are facing a $12 million defamation lawsuit.

The lawsuit comes from the Virginia Citizens Defense League (VCDL), a Second Amendment rights advocacy group. Members of the VCDL were interviewed for the documentary which was edited in such a way as to make them look like they could not answer a simple question.

In the film interview Couric asks, “If there are no background checks for gun purchasers, how do you prevent felons or terrorists from purchasing a gun?”

Some nine seconds of silence follow, with the camera showing various VCDL members look at one another and down at the floor, seemingly unable to come up with an answer. The interviewees include a licensed firearms dealer and a licensed attorney who is an expert on the laws and regulations regarding firearms.

In truth they were more than ready to answer the question, and gave prompt and reasonable responses, the raw audio of the interview showed.

The director of the film, Soechtig, provided a statement when caught saying that the editing was intended to serve as a “pause” on the question before presenting the facts. Couric later issued her own statement, stating she supported Soechtig and was “very proud of the film.”

Outrage directed at Couric and Soechtig from the gun community ensued, and the filmmakers even raised eyebrows from the mainstream media for their deceptive practices.

In their filing, the VCDL allege that the editing was deceptive and malicious and a work of fiction. They allege that the filmmakers “manipulated the footage in service of an agenda: they wanted to establish that there is no basis for opposing universal background checks by fooling viewers into believing that even a panel of pro-Second Amendment advocates could not provide one.”

The filmmakers even used lighting techniques to make the VCDL members look dark and sinister while giving pro-gun control proponents more flattering lighting.

“We were horrified to see how Couric and her team manipulated us and the video footage to make us look like fools who didn’t stand up for the Second Amendment,” said Mr. Philip Van Cleave, President of the VCDL. “We want to set the record straight and hold them accountable for what they’ve done. You shouldn’t intentionally misrepresent someone’s views just because you disagree with them.”

The lawsuit, filed in federal court, seeks $12 million in compensatory damages, plus punitive damages.

Hopefully, the VCDL will get every red cent

Photo by By Joella Marano

, ,

  • harness.mary

    I currently gain in the span of 6k-8k dollars /every month doing an internet task. For anyone eager to finish basic freelance task for some h a day from your living room and gain decent benefit while doing it… Then this golden opportunity is for you… FAVE.CO/1Pj7URJ

    sdfsf

  • Terry Story

    I think that is super and maybe that will give pause to those that would copy her disreputable, lying efforts to impose restrictions and/or eliminate the right of possession of firearms!

  • I remember years ago she interviewed a cop that had been shot and asked if they were for more gun control and when the cop said no, the interview ended. Quickly. It was a live feed. She’s always been this way.

Quantcast
[index]
[index]