Why No One Is Seeing Eye-to-Eye In The Gun Control Debate

Why No One Is Seeing Eye-to-Eye In The Gun Control Debate

Just recently, California Governor Jerry Brown signed 6 new gun control laws. In his message to his constituents in the state of California, he described his actions as responsible and focused.

“My goal in signing these bills is to enhance public safety by tightening our existing laws in a responsible and focused manner, while protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners,” Gov. Brown said.

In one legislative session, the Democrat-controlled California House and Senate have managed to create the most draconian restrictions on law-abiding gun owners. Not far from Sacramento, the Federal 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that concealed carry is not a constitutionally guaranteed right.

Across the country in Washington, the United States Congress was gridlocked after Democrats took to a sit-in protest demanding gun control measures. This protest included a catered buffet paid by taxpayers.

Why is there such a disconnect between those in favor of stricter gun regulations and those against?

The answer to that could begin with perspective.

The Bill of Rights is part of the social contract of the citizens of the United States and those of them who operate the legislative, executive, and judiciary bodies. Many people no longer seem to understand what a social contract is. A social contract is an agreement amongst people to operate under a set of rules. By being a citizen of the United States, we implicitly agree to abide by its rules.

Social contracts can and have been broken.

This happens where there is no confidence in the ability of those running the establishment to continue to operate in the perceived best interest of the people.

See what I did there? Perceived.

There’s the root of it, again.

There are people in this country who, for whatever reason, honestly view the government as a discrete body separate from the people. This government does its thing, produces its own result and should service the people’s popular desires. When that fails to happen, this group balks and promises to vote for another established government candidate when election season comes up.

When danger strikes, these people want someone else to deal with it… Someone to show up and make it go away.

These people took the same civics class everyone did in high school. We’re in a representative republic and we have a Bill of Rights. However, the conditions of those amendments in the Bill of Rights seem somehow inconvenient in modern times. Why do modern people need privately owned guns anymore? We have the police!

And when the police take minutes to respond, then they are flabbergasted bad guys had access to guns in the first place.

It’s not stupidity. It’s not progressive. It’s just perception.

For an individual gun owner who supports the Second Amendment, he probably sees a gun for what it is: a tool. A tool in capable, responsible hands is a blessing. In a bad man’s hands, it’s a danger.

Both of these viewpoints are held by people who are considered smart and simple alike. The core underlying theme is perception. And unfortunately, we live in an age where the growing gap between the different views is getting so extreme that constructive dialogue fails. Here’s a handy guide for talking to someone who disagrees with you:

  • They’re not inherently dumb because they don’t agree.
  • Stick to the point.
  • Stay above name-calling.
  • Direct towards the issue, not the person.

If we’re able to do just those four simple things, we’ll probably find we can have a rational conversation amongst adults.

Read More: Talking to Hoplophobes: Dealing with Opposition to the Second Amendment

, ,

  • Mildred5214

    I am getting paid around 6,000-8,000 dollars on monthly basis online. For those of you who are looking to do simple computer-based work for several hrs each day from your home and get good income in the same time… Then this work opportunity is for you… SELF99.COM

  • The problem with social contracts is that people have no choice of the contract in which they are born into and it’s one that often cannot be changed, at least not by the individual. I would also add that just because it’s a societal construct, it doesn’t make it automatically good or right. I am not a legal positivist on this or anything for that matter. Authority eventually serves itself. Robert Heinlein said it pretty succinctly. The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.

    I fall into the latter.

    • Ruth5214

      I basically make close to 6.000-8.000 bucks /a month from freelancing online. So if you are ready to complete easy at home work for several hrs every day from your living room and make valuable profit in the same time… Try this gig SELF92.COM

  • Ann6951

    I basically make around 6000-8000 bucks /month working online. Those who are ready to do easy computer-based jobs for 2h-5h every day from your house and get valuable paycheck while doing it… This is perfect for you… SELF92.COM

  • KUETSA

    “Why No One Is Seeing Eye-to-Eye In The Gun Control Debate”

    BECAUSE THERE IS NO GUN CONTROL DEBATE – THERE IS ONLY INCREMENTAL CITIZEN DISARMAMENT!

    “My goal in signing these bills is to enhance public safety by tightening our existing laws in a responsible and focused manner, while protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners,” Gov. Brown said.

    Except in the REAL WORLD – To enhance REAL safety for active and retired law enforcement officials, who we want to actually SUCCEED IN RETAINING THE ABILITY TO DEFEND THEMSELVES AND THEIR FAMILIES, WE WILL EXEMPT THEM FROM GUN CONTROL RESTRICTIONS.

    POLITICIANS WILL NOT RELINQUISH THEIR SECURITY DETAILS BECAUSE OF THE GLORY OF “ENHANCED PUBLIC SAFETY”!

    “Protecting the rights of law-abiding gun owners”
    TRANSLATION:
    We’re “allowing you to sill own a pop-gun” (That’s good enough for you) ((It shows we comply with the damn second amendment))

    I AM NOTHING BUT SICK OF THE RELENTLESS DAILY ATTACK ON OUR RIGHT TO BE EFFECTIVELY ARMED!

    THERE IS NOTHING TO DISCUSS!
    NEVER SURRENDER YOUR FIREARMS!

Quantcast