Key Takeaways
- The CDC estimates defensive gun use ranges from 60,000 to 2.5 million times annually, now reinstated on their website after removal in 2022.
- Gun control advocates, like The Trace, have objected to the CDC’s retrieval of this data.
- The variance in estimates stems from differing methodologies in question framing and study populations.
- Gun Owners of America claims that fewer than 8% of defensive uses result in harm, with many instances resolving without shots fired.
- The CDC’s display of defensive gun use data signals a shift in dialogue despite no legal changes or impacts on firearm regulations.
Estimated reading time: 4 minutes
ATLANTA, GA — The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is again telling the public that Americans use firearms defensively somewhere between 60,000 and 2.5 million times a year. The estimate sits on the agency’s “About Firearm Injury and Death” page under a subheading titled “Defensive Gun Use.”
The number itself is not new. What is new is that it is back. The CDC removed the defensive gun use material from its site in 2022 and has now reposted it, and the gun control outlet The Trace has publicly objected to its return, as reported by Breitbart News.
Here is the agency’s language, verbatim: “Estimates of defensive gun use vary depending on the questions asked, populations studied, timeframe, and other factors related to study design. The report Priorities for Research to Reduce the Threat of Firearm-Related Violence indicates a range of 60,000 to 2.5 million defensive gun uses each year.”
That is a federal public health agency, on a page whose stated purpose is calling firearm violence “a serious public health problem,” conceding that the upper bound of lawful defensive firearm use in this country runs into the millions. The CDC defines defensive gun use as the use of a firearm to protect and defend oneself, family, and other people against crime or victimization. Deadly force, of course, is a narrower thing than that. It is justified only against an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm, and that is the standard armed citizens across the country carry under every single day.
The spread between 60,000 and 2.5 million is enormous, and the CDC says plainly why: the answer moves depending on how you ask the question and who you ask. Anyone who quotes the top number as settled fact is overselling it, and anyone who quotes the bottom number as settled fact is doing the same thing in the other direction.
Gun Owners of America has cited the 2.5 million figure for years in its “Guns Save Lives” fact sheet, and GOA also points to a lower federal estimate: the National Institute of Justice published a figure of as many as 1.5 million defensive uses per year in its 1997 “Guns in America” study. GOA’s fact sheet makes a second point that gets lost in the argument over totals. In the overwhelming majority of defensive gun uses, nobody is shot. By GOA’s accounting, fewer than 8 percent of the time does an armed citizen kill or wound an attacker. The gun is presented, the threat evaporates, and the encounter ends without a round fired.
More from USA Carry:
That is the part of the data that matters most to the way I train and the way I tell readers to train. The overwhelmingly likely defensive gun use is not a gunfight. It is a decision made under pressure, in bad light, on short notice, and mindset is what carries it. The same people making that decision are also navigating a state-by-state patchwork of carry rules, which is why I keep concealed carry permit information by state current and why knowing your own state’s standard before you need it is not optional.
What a federal agency chooses to publish is a policy signal, not a legal change. Nothing about the CDC restoring this page alters a single statute, permit requirement, or use-of-force standard anywhere in the country. But for two decades the loudest institutional voices in this debate have counted firearm harms with precision and firearm defenses not at all, and a page that acknowledges the defensive side exists is a different starting point for the next argument than a page that does not.
