Fake New, Misinformation, and CCW: The Art of Finding Accurate Information

Fake New, Misinformation, and CCW: The Art of Finding Accurate Information

There’s been a lot of talk about fake news and the fine line between fake news and propaganda.  Likewise, in the firearms community there’s a lot of misinformation about . . . .honestly about just about everything. Terminal ballistics, caliber stats, the performance and reliability of many makes and models of firearm—and of course the laws and politics around the right to keep and bear arms.

Not to disappoint, but I’ll be sidestepping the political issue here for now. I’d prefer to focus on how we read the news and filter/understand the information we receive. How do you separate the wheat from the chaff and the fake news/misinformation from the good stuff? Well, no worries—there are some fairly easy to apply guidelines and critical thinking techniques we can use to achieve just that.

Let’s go over them:

First and foremost, take a look at the site URL: anything ending in .lo or .co.com is suspect automatically. Which isn’t to say that the more reliable and conventional .edu, .com, or .net sites can’t spread fake news too, but a suspicious URL is an automatic read flag.

Second, check the attribution. If there’s no byline to the story, or if the same byline appears for every story on the website, another red flag ought to go up. Stories from the AP Wire or Reuters may not have an author byline, but they’ll be credited to those agencies.

Actually read the article. We’ve had more than a few spoof stories spread around proving that many folks don’t read beyond a sensationalist or attention-grabbing clickbait headline and just share the article immediately. Don’t be that person—read the piece in question with a critical and open mind.

Check the supporting sources. Almost all legit articles will cite outside sources or research, which you should then examine on your own. I know it’s time consuming, but this is part of being an informed and aware person when it comes to firearms or any other subject.

Get your news and information from a variety of sources. There’s a whole world out there that can be accessed with a few clicks of the mouse and a bit of typing. Take advantage of that fact and read news and gather data from as wide a swath as you can. All of it should be approached critically and all of it should be vetted, but use as much as you can to learn as much as you can.

Finally, we reach the hard part: read the arguments, points of view, and information of people who hold different positions than your own. This includes folks with whom you might vehemently disagree. By better understanding your argument you’ll further your understanding of the subject as a whole. And who knows—they might make a good point or two.

Over the last two centuries, a heck of a lot has been written about firearms, the Second Amendment, CCW, shooting, and all the other subjects we enjoy. By applying the approaches I’ve outlined above, you’ll be in a better position to find accurate information as you continue your journey through the world of guns, CCW, and self defense. Bon voyage!

, ,

  • I profited 104,000 bucks previous year by doing an on-line job and I did that by working in my own time f­o­r 3 or sometimes more hrs a day. I was following a business model I came across from this website i found online and I am amazed that i earned so much money on the side. It’s really beginner friendly and I’m just so happy that i learned about it. Here’s what I do… TWITTER.COM/StinnettMargar1/status/836191059310866432

  • Jo Sheehan

    Love this article, especially the “hard part.” It brought back a memory of high school where you always had that one teacher who passed out a test and said “be sure and read the instructions before starting,” and if you followed the instructions you only had to answer questions 4, 7 and 10.

  • Lots of what some call fake news is just information they disagree with and to avoid cognitive dissonance, they label it fake news.

    • I was paid $104,000 previous year by working from my house and I did that by work­ing in my own time f­o­r several h a day. I’m using work model I stumbled upon from company that i found online and I am excited that I was able to earn so much extra income. It’s really user-friendly a­­n­­d I am just so happy that i discovered it. Here’s what I did… EASYURL.NET/f2265

    • I was paid 104000 dollars last year by working online from my house a­­n­­d I was able to do it by w­o­r­k­i­n­g part time for few hrs daily. I followed work opportunity I found online and I am thrilled that i was able to make so much extra income. It’s so beginner friendly a­n­d I am just so happy that I found out about this. Check out what I do… http://jump­.­wtf/CCcHHu1

    • arthur.sitton

      I was without work for half a year when my former Fellow worker lastly advised me to begin freelancing at home… It was just after I received $5000 in my very first thirty days when I seriously believed I really could do this for a living! Now I am joyful than ever… I work-from-home and also I am my own boss now like I always wanted… I see a lot of discouraged people around me, working the same old boring job that is sucking the life out of all of them day-after-day… Whenever I see anybody similar to that I say START FREELANCING MAN! This is how I started >>>> www­.­cat­.­org­.­uk/snip/93439

  • Jenny Everywhere

    If you can contact and talk to the author, and they actually have a cogent discussion with you on the issue at hand, that’s a plus in its favor. If the author turns out to be a fractious and dismissive douche who attacks YOU instead of your ideas, then that’s a big minus.

  • Mainstream media has been a system of brainwashing, propaganda & fake news since 1945.
    The fact that they threw in a few bits and pieces of what happened on low levels (local crimes, weather disasters, sports & other holiday events) to be true is just to justify & mix truth with lies to create the most believable lie.

Quantcast